Authors :
Fatmata Fauziatu Vincent; Hamza Amin Kargbo
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 9 - September
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/6zj7j75w
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26sep148
Note : A published paper may take 4-5
working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and
ResearchGate.
Abstract :
Sierra Leone food system contains a large body of practical knowledge developed through rice parboiling, cassava
fermentation, fish smoking, sun drying, oil extraction and other household or small-enterprise techniques. These practices
remain important to food availability, taste, identity and income, yet they operate within value chains marked by postharvest loss, variable quality, weak market information and limited access to suitable processing equipment. This critical
narrative review examines how digital technologies could strengthen, document and responsibly modernise indigenous food
processing and preservation without displacing the knowledge holders on whom the system depends. Evidence was
synthesised from peer-reviewed research and policy or institutional publications on Sierra Leone, West Africa and
comparable smallholder food systems. The review identifies six practical pathways: digital documentation of local
knowledge; mobile and multimedia training; low-cost sensing and decision support; digital quality assurance and
traceability; market, payment and logistics platforms; and data-enabled coordination of processors, extension services and
public institutions. These pathways can reduce avoidable loss, improve food safety, widen market access, support womenand youth-led enterprises and make local foods more visible within national food-security programmes. However,
technology is not automatically inclusive. Unreliable electricity and connectivity, device and data costs, limited digital
literacy, gendered control of assets, weak standards, cybersecurity risks and the extraction of community knowledge without
consent may reproduce existing inequalities. The article proposes a human-centred “document validate adapt connect
govern” framework and argues for phased pilots built around familiar foods, local languages, offline functionality and
measurable food-security outcomes. Digital transformation should therefore be understood as a partnership between
indigenous expertise and appropriate technology, not as the replacement of traditional practice by imported systems.
Keywords :
Indigenous Knowledge; Food Processing; Food Preservation; Digital Agriculture; Post-Harvest Loss; Food Security; Sierra Leone.
References :
- Achieng, M. S. (2022). Digitalisation of indigenous knowledge of agricultural practices: A strategy for food security in Africa. Journal of Public Administration, 57(4). https://doi.org/10.10520/ejc-jpad_v57_n4_a5
- Adzawla, W., Azumah, S. B., Anani, P. Y., & Donkoh, S. A. (2022). Gender perspectives of ICT utilization in agriculture and climate response in West Africa: A review. Sustainability, 14(19), 12240. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912240
- Affognon, H., Mutungi, C., Sanginga, P., & Borgemeister, C. (2015). Unpacking postharvest losses in sub-Saharan Africa: A meta-analysis. World Development, 66, 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.08.002
- Agyekumhene, C., de Vries, J. R., van Paassen, A., Schut, M., & MacNaghten, P. (2024). Digitalisation in agriculture: A scoping review of technologies in practice, challenges, and opportunities for smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 18, 101286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101286
- Bisheko, M. J., & Robinson, G. (2023). Major barriers to adoption of improved postharvest technologies among smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia: A systematic literature review. World Development Sustainability, 2, 100070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wds.2023.100070
- Clark, L. F., & Hobbs, J. E. (2018). Informational barriers, quality assurance and the scaling up of complementary food supply chains in sub-Saharan Africa. Outlook on Agriculture, 47(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030727018760601
- Food and Agriculture Organization Investment Centre. (2025). Agrifood system stakeholders committed to concrete action to implement and achieve Feed Salone Pillar 3 in Sierra Leone. https://www.fao.org/investment-centre/latest/news/detail/agrifood-system-stakeholders-committed-to-concrete-action-to-implement-and-achieve-feed-salone-pillar-3-in-sierra-leone/en
- Foday, S., Wadsworth, R., Sonda, T. S., et al. (2025). Exploring the decline of neglected and underutilized food crops in Sierra Leone. Discover Agriculture, 3, 267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44279-025-00442-x
- Hoffmann, V., Mutiga, S., Harvey, J., Nelson, R., & Milgroom, M. G. (2022). The economics of postharvest loss and loss-preventing technologies in developing countries. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 14, 243–265. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-111820-020601
- Jonsyn, F. E., & Lahai, G. P. (1992). Mycotoxic flora and mycotoxins in smoke-dried fish from Sierra Leone. Nahrung, 36(5), 485–489. https://doi.org/10.1002/food.19920360510
- Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security. (2023). Feed Salone strategy: A blueprint for agricultural transformation in Sierra Leone, 2023–2028. Government of Sierra Leone. http://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/sie228200.pdf
- Mkhize, P. (2024). Information systems and smallholder farming in developing countries: A systematic literature review. The African Journal of Information and Communication, 33. https://doi.org/10.23962/ajic.i33.17050
- Nwafor, S. C., Agba, S. A., Ugbem-Onah, C., & Uwandu, Q. C. (2022). Role of information and communication technologies towards sustainability transitions in agriculture and food systems. Nigeria Agricultural Journal, 53(2), 40–45.
- Porciello, J., Coggins, S., Mabaya, E., & Otunba-Payne, G. (2022). Digital agriculture services in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic scoping review. Global Food Security, 34, 100640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2022.100640
- Sheahan, M., & Barrett, C. B. (2017). Food loss and waste in sub-Saharan Africa. Food Policy, 70, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.03.012
- Sierra Leone Digital Transformation Project. (2026). About the Sierra Leone Digital Transformation Project. https://sldtp.gov.sl/who-we-are/
- Stathers, T., Holcroft, D., Kitinoja, L., Mvumi, B. M., English, A., Omotilewa, O., Kocher, M., Ault, J., & Torero, M. (2020). A scoping review of interventions for crop postharvest loss reduction in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Nature Sustainability, 3, 821–835. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00622-1
- Tsan, M., Totapally, S., Hailu, M., & Addom, B. K. (2019). The digitalisation of African agriculture report 2018–2019. Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation.
- World Bank. (2023). Small grants yield big wins for women farmers in Sierra Leone. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2023/03/10/small-grants-yield-big-wins-for-women-farmers-in-sierra-leone
- World Bank. (2026). World Bank approves $40 million to boost agricultural value chains and job creation in Sierra Leone. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2026/06/18/world-bank-approves-40-million-to-boost-agricultural-value-chains-and-job-creation-in-sierra-leone
- World Food Programme. (2024). Food Security Monitoring System report: Sierra Leone country office, February 2024. https://www.wfp.org/publications/food-security-monitoring-system-report-wfp-sierra-leone-country-office-february-2024
22. World Food Programme. (2026). EU and WFP partner to strengthen child nutrition and local food systems in Sierra Leone. https://www.wfp.org/news/eu-and-wfp-
Sierra Leone food system contains a large body of practical knowledge developed through rice parboiling, cassava
fermentation, fish smoking, sun drying, oil extraction and other household or small-enterprise techniques. These practices
remain important to food availability, taste, identity and income, yet they operate within value chains marked by postharvest loss, variable quality, weak market information and limited access to suitable processing equipment. This critical
narrative review examines how digital technologies could strengthen, document and responsibly modernise indigenous food
processing and preservation without displacing the knowledge holders on whom the system depends. Evidence was
synthesised from peer-reviewed research and policy or institutional publications on Sierra Leone, West Africa and
comparable smallholder food systems. The review identifies six practical pathways: digital documentation of local
knowledge; mobile and multimedia training; low-cost sensing and decision support; digital quality assurance and
traceability; market, payment and logistics platforms; and data-enabled coordination of processors, extension services and
public institutions. These pathways can reduce avoidable loss, improve food safety, widen market access, support womenand youth-led enterprises and make local foods more visible within national food-security programmes. However,
technology is not automatically inclusive. Unreliable electricity and connectivity, device and data costs, limited digital
literacy, gendered control of assets, weak standards, cybersecurity risks and the extraction of community knowledge without
consent may reproduce existing inequalities. The article proposes a human-centred “document validate adapt connect
govern” framework and argues for phased pilots built around familiar foods, local languages, offline functionality and
measurable food-security outcomes. Digital transformation should therefore be understood as a partnership between
indigenous expertise and appropriate technology, not as the replacement of traditional practice by imported systems.
Keywords :
Indigenous Knowledge; Food Processing; Food Preservation; Digital Agriculture; Post-Harvest Loss; Food Security; Sierra Leone.