Authors : Mary Ann Miral- Benecario

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 6 - June

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3cayxu57

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/275wtt48

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUN256

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : This study presents the outcomes of a thematic analysis based on responses from participants, shedding light on effectiveness of differentiated instruction in improving math achievement for students with diverse learning needs. There were eight (8) teachers from Talomo District, Davao City who participated in the study. This study made use of a phenomenological approach to extract the ideas from the participants. The participants were purposely selected as representatives from the same district. The study identifies three core challenges teachers encounter, namely: grappling with diverse materials and resources in teaching, managing the classroom effectively, and providing varying levels of support to students with diverse learning needs. To address these challenges, teachers resort to two primary coping mechanisms: participating in professional learning communities (PLCs) and fostering increased parental involvement in the educational process. Furthermore, participants emphasize the importance of implementing advanced evaluation methods for educational improvement. In summary, this thematic analysis offers insights on the importance of implementing advanced evaluation methods for educational improvement. These findings hold significance for educational stakeholders seeking to better support teachers, promote collaboration, and enhance the educational experience for students. For principals and school heads, it is essential to foster receptiveness to the challenges faced by teachers in implementing differentiated instruction and the coping mechanisms they employ. Understanding these needs and struggles can guide school leaders in providing the necessary support, resources, and professional development opportunities.

Keywords : Differentiated Instruction, Math Achievement, Diverse Learning Needs.

References :

1. Awofala, A. O. A. & Lawani, A. O. (2020). Increasing Mathematics Achievement of Senior Secondary School Students through Differentiated Instruction. Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(1), 1-19.
2. Beecher, M. & Sweeny, S. (2008). Closing the achievement gap with curriculum enrichment and differentiation: One School’s Story. Journal of Advanced Academics Behavioral Sciences, 8, 294–298.
3. Bernardo, A. (2002). Language and Mathematical Problem Solving Among Bilinguals. The Journal of Psychology, 136(3), 283-297. Bernardo, A. & Calleja, M. (2005). The Effects of Stating Problems in Bilingual Students’ First and Second Languages on Solving Mathematical Word Problems. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 166(1), 117–128.
4. Bakker, J., & Denessen, E. (2007). The concept of parental involvement. Some theoretical and empirical considerations. International Journal about Parents in Education, 1, 188-199.
5. Bean, R. A., Bush, K. R., McKenry, P. C., & Wilson, S. M. (2003). The impact of parental support, behavioral control, and psychological control on the academic achievement and self-esteem of African American and European American adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 18, 523-541. doi:10.1177/0743558403255070
6. Barbara Beatty. Preschool Education in America: The Culture of Young Children                 from the Colonial Era to the Present. New Haven: Yale University Press.     1995. Pp. xvi, 252.
7. Bert Van Oers 2013, Teaching in a play-based curriculum: Theory, practice and    evidence of developmental education for young children
8. Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (2007). Tools of the Mind: The Vygotskian approach to early childhood education (2nd Ed.). Columbus, OH; Merrill/Prentice           Hall.
9. Carnine, D. W., Silbert, J., Kame’enui, E., & Tarver, S. G. (2004).Direct      instruction reading (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson.
10. Carnine, D. W., Silbert, J., Kame’enui, E., Tarver, S. G., &Jungjohan, K. (2006).       Teaching struggling and at-risk readers:A direction instruction approach.            Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson
11. Ellis, F. (2000). Rural livelihoods and diversity in developing countries. New York:                 Oxford Uni. Press Inc.
12. Felipe Schwartzman (2008) Heterogeneous Price Setting Behavior and Monetary Non-neutrality: Some General Results
13. Hillary L. Burdette, MD, MS; Robert C. Whitaker, MD, MPH. Resurrecting Free     Play in Young ChildrenLooking Beyond Fitness and Fatness to Attention,      Affiliation, and Affect
14. Kagan, S. (1990). The structural approach to cooperative learning. Educational leadership (47(4). 12-16.
15. McAfee., N. & Leong., D. (2010).Assessing and guiding young children’s development and Learning. (5thEd.). Boston, MA:Pearson.
16. Njoki., E.M. (2007). Factors that affect the quality of pre-school physical                education programme In Sagana Zone, Kirinyanga District. Unpublished Master of Education in Early Childhood Education Research project, University of Nairobi.
17. Ong, P., Liao, V. & Alimon, R. (2009). Moderating Language and Number of Mathematical Operations in the Relationship between Problem Solving Scores and Learning Strategies. TESOL Journal, 1, 58-78, http://www.tesol- journal.com.
18. Ogunkunle, R. A. & Onwunedo, A. H. (2014). Effect of differentiated instructional strategies on students’ retention in geometry in federal capital territory senior secondary schools, Abuja, Nigeria. Global Journal of Educational Research, 13, 1-7.
19. Ogunleye, A., Awofala, A. O. A & Adekoya, E. A. (2014). Effect of students’ background knowledge of mathematics on senior secondary school students’ achievement in physics. Chemistry: Bulgarian Journal of Science Education, 23(6), 863-880.
20. Rojo, P. (2013). Studying the effects of differentiated instruction in the science classroom. Master’s Project. Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana.
21. Pellegrini., A.D. & Smith., P.K. (1998).The development of play during childhood   forms and possible functions. Child psychopsychiatry Re. 3:51-57.
22. Piaget, Jean. 1962. Play, Dreams and Imitation in Childhood Retrieved from          ERIC database. (ED 426776)
23. Saracho, O.N. (2002). Young Children’s Creativity and Pretend Play. Early Child   Development and Care, 172, 431-438.
24. Saracho, Z. and Olivia, N. [2001]. Teachers' Perceptions of their Roles in Promoting Literacy in the Context of Play in A SpanishSpeaking    Kindergarten International Journal of Early Childhood, 33(2), 18-31 Sharon F Rallis Dynamic Teachers: Leaders of Change by
25. Shonkoff, J. P., & Phillips, D. A. (Eds.). (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods:     The science of early childhood development. National Academy Press.
26. Tomlinson, C. (2003). Fulfilling the promise of the differentiated classroom: Strategies and tools for responsive teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
27. Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). Differentiated instruction in the regular classroom: What does it mean? How does it look? Understanding Our Gifted, 14, 3- 6.
28. Tomlinson, C., & Eidson, C. (2003). Differentiation in practice: A resource guide for differentiating curriculum. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
29. Tomlinson, C., & Imbeau, M. (2010). Leading and managing a differentiated classroom. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.