Authors : Vima G. Obut; Lydante B. Denopol; Genelyn R. Baluyos

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 9 - September

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/2dpu3m59

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/bdz53bh6

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24SEP528

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : Mathematics frequently involves abstract concepts and symbols, presenting a challenge for certain students who may need help to retain these concepts. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of manipulating real objects in enhancing retention among grade 7 students struggling with concepts of angles during S.Y. 2023–2024 in a public institution in the city of Ozamiz. This study used a classroom-based action research design with 31 students as participants using purposive sampling. Research-made test questionnaires and interview guide questions were used to gather data. The data was interpreted using statistical tools, mean, standard deviation, and t-test, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Thus, the following were the study's key findings: the students' retention level of the concepts of angles before manipulating real objects did not meet expectations; the students' retention level of the concepts of angles after manipulating real objects was very satisfactory; there was a significant difference in the students' retention level of the concepts of angles before and after manipulating real objects; and other developments observed among the students after manipulating real objects involved increased student engagement, mastery of angles, and real-life application. Integrating manipulatives into mathematics instruction can significantly enhance students' retention of angle concepts. Teachers may incorporate the use of manipulatives and real objects in the teaching of angles to provide students with tangible and interactive experiences.

Keywords : Angles, Hands-On Activities, Manipulatives, Math, Real Objects, Retention.

References :

1. Adeshina, A. N. G., & Eberechukwu, O. I. (2023). Gender Differences in Students Achievement and Retention in Mathematics: A Case of Self-Regulated Learning Strategy. Rethinking the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics in the Pandemic Era, 40.
2. Aliu, H. O., & Raheem, H. O. (2023). Relationship Between Teaching Styles and Mathematics Achievement of Ibadan North Secondary School Students: Practical Application of Peer-Cooperative Learning to Improve Retention of STEM Majors. Relationship Between Teaching Styles and Mathematics Achievement of Ibadan North Secondary School Students: Practical Application of Peer-Cooperative Learning to Improve Retention of STEM Majors, 4(4), 269-283.
3. Aramo-Immonen, H. (2013). Mixed Methods Research Design. In: Lytras, M.D., Ruan, D., Tennyson, R.D., Ordonez De Pablos, P., García Peñalvo, F.J., Rusu, L. (eds) Information Systems, E-learning, and Knowledge Management Research. WSKS 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 278. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
4. Bartolini, M. G., & Martignone, F. (2020). Manipulatives in mathematics education. Encyclopedia of mathematics education, 487-494.
5. Basco, R. O. (2020). Effectiveness of Song, Drill and Game Strategy in Improving Mathematical Performance. International Educational Research, 3(2), p1-p1.
6. Comighud, S. M. T. (2021). Factors on memory retention: effect on students’ academic performance. International Journal of Business and Technology, 9(1), 1-24.
7. Del Cerro Velázquez, F., & Morales Méndez, G. (2021). Application in augmented reality for learning mathematical functions: A study for the development of spatial intelligence in secondary education students. Mathematics, 9(4), 369.
8. Egara, F. O., Eseadi C., & Nzeadibe, A. C. (2022). Effect of computer simulation on secondary school students’ interest in algebra. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 5457-5469.
9. Enikanolaye, A. J. (2021). Effects of Multimedia Instructional Strategy on Senior School Students' Performance and Retention in Mathematics. Anatolian Journal of Education, 6(2), 193-206.
10. Gargrish, S., Kaur, D. P., Mantri, A., Singh, G., & Sharma, B. (2021). Measuring effectiveness of augmented reality‐based geometry learning assistant on memory retention abilities of the students in 3D geometry. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(6), 1811-1824.
11. Guest, G., & Fleming, P. (2015). Mixed methods research. Public health research methods, 581-610
12. Gurung, Raj & Chaudhary, Dipendra. (2022). Effectiveness of Instruction with Manipulative Materials on Fourth Graders’ Geometry Learning Achievement. Journal of Bhuwanishankar. 1. 69-84. 10.3126/jobs.v1i1.49495.
13. ariati, P. (2020). Improving Students’ Vocabulary Mastery through Teaching Real Objects. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 3(2), 740-748.
14. Hobri, H., AGUS SUSANTO, H., HIDAYATI, A. H., Susanto, S., &Warli, W. (2021). Exploring thinking process of students with Mathematics learning disability in solving arithmetic problems.
15. Iqbal, M. Z., Shams, J. A., & Nazir, M. (2020). Effect of Using Mathematics Manipulatives on the Student’s Academic Achievemen. JSE, 2(1).
16. Irvine, J. (2020). Positively Influencing Student Engagement and Attitude in Mathematics through an Instructional Intervention Using Reform Mathematics Principles. Journal of Education and Learning, 9(2), 48-75.
17. Kang, S., Shokeen, E., Byrne, V. L., Norooz, L., Bonsignore, E., Williams-Pierce, C., & Froehlich, J. E. (2020, April). ARMath: augmenting everyday life with math learning. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1-15).
18. Kleden, M. A., Sugi, Y., & Samo, D. D. (2021). Analysis of mathematical connections ability on junior high school students. International Journal of Educational Management and Innovation, 2(3), 261-271.
19. Kmetová, M., & Nagyová Lehocká, Z. (2021). Using Tangram as a Manipulative Tool for Transition between 2D and 3D Perception in Geometry. Mathematics, 9(18), 2185.
20. Krawitz, J., Chang, Y. P., Yang, K. L., & Schukajlow, S. (2022). The role of reading comprehension in mathematical modelling: improving the construction of a real-world model and interest in Germany and Taiwan. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 109(2), 337-359.
21. Lange, J. (2021). The importance of using manipulatives in math class.
22. Lugosi, E., & Uribe, G. (2022). Active learning strategies with positive effects on students’ achievements in undergraduate mathematics education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(2), 403-424.
23. Mainali, B. (2021). Representation in teaching and learning mathematics. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 9(1), 1-21.
24. Marji, M. S., Musta'amal, A. H., Chidozie, C. C., & Hassan, S. C. (2023). An Action Research on The Effect of Using Real Modeled Object in Teaching Orthographic Drawing Concepts on Students’ Performance. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 1192-1201.
25. Meke, K. D. P., Jailani, J., Wutsqa, D. U., & Alfi, H. D. (2019, February). Problem based learning using manipulative materials to improve student interest of mathematics learning. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1157, p. 032099). IOP Publishing.
26. Monte, J. (2021). An Exploration of Manipulatives in Math Education.
27. Mosimege, M. D. & Egara, F. O. (2022). perception and perspective of teachers towards the usage of ethnomathematics approach in mathematics teaching and learning. Multicultural Education, 8(3), 288-298.
28. Moyer, P. S. (2001). Are we having fun yet? How teachers use manipulatives to teach mathematics. Educational Studies in mathematics, 47(2), 175-197.
29. Mumcu, H. Y. (2020). Using Mathematics, Mathematical Applications, Mathematical Modelling, and Mathematical Literacy: A Theoretical Study. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(36), 80-96.
30. Naidoo, J., & Kapofu, W. (2020). Exploring female learners’ perceptions of learning geometry in mathematics. South African Journal of Education, 40(1), 1-11.
31. Nzeadibe, A. C., Egara, F. O., Inweregbuh, O. C., & Osakwe, I. J. (2019). Effect of problem-solving and collaborative strategy on students’ retention in geometry. African Journal of Science, Technology and Mathematics Education, 5(1), 9-20.
32. O’Sullivan, L., Casey, D., & Crowley, J. (2021). Asynchronous online mathematics learning support: an exploration of interaction data to inform future provision. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 40(4), 317-331.
33. Pangestu, A., Muryaningsih, S., & Bintaro, T. Y. (2020). Improving Democratic Attitude and Mathematics Learning Achievement of Measuring Angle Material Using STAD Cooperative Learning Method Supported by Angle-clock Props on Grade IV B Students of SD Muhammadiyah Purwokerto. Proceedings STEMEIF.
34. Sarfo,J. O., García-Santillán, A., Adusei, A., Violetta S. M., Marina, D., Olena, S., Donyeh, P. S., Somayeh, Z., Reza, N., Violeta, E., Sadia, M., Farzana, A., Najma, I. M., Edward, W. A., Hattaphan, W., Egara, F. O., Arun, T., Josephine, C., Uzma, A., Mohammed, S. H., Mai, H., & Zahir, V. (2022). Psychometric properties of anxiety towards mathematics scale using samples from four continents. European Journal of Contemporary Education 11(2), 504-514.
35. Sarkar, P., Kadam, K., & Pillai, J. S. (2020). Learners' approaches, motivation, and patterns of problem-solving on lines and angles in geometry using augmented reality. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), 1-23.
36. Sudirman, S., Kusumah, Y. S., Bambang Avip, P. M., & Runisah. (2023). Epistemological obstacle in 3D geometry thinking: Representation, spatial structuring, and measurement. Pegem Egitim Ve Ogretim Dergisi = Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 13(4), 292-301.
37. Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2011). Mixed methods research. The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 4, 285-300.
38. Rowly, E. (2020). The Effects of Math Manipulatives In the Classroom.
39. Valderama, J., & Oligo, J. (2021). Learning Retention in Mathematics over Consecutive Weeks: Impact of Motivated Forgetting. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(4), 1245-1254.
40. Yeh, C. Y., Cheng, H. N., Chen, Z. H., Liao, C. C., & Chan, T. W. (2019). Enhancing achievement and interest in Mathematics learning through Math-Island. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 14(1), 1-19.
41. Yin, H., Varava, A., & Kragic, D. (2021). Modeling, learning, perception, and control methods for deformable object manipulation. Science Robotics, 6(54), eabd8803.