The Effects of Teaching Conjunctions on the Cohesion of EFL Students’ Compositions


Authors : Truong Dinh Minh Dang

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 9 - September


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/4e5drzrf

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/2vmm3y89

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24SEP545

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : A well-written work is not only grammatically correct but also cohesive and coherent. Conjunctions are fundamental to the cohesion of a text and should be taught in writing classes. This study explores the role of conjunctions in creating cohesive and coherent writing and their impact on EFL students' written production. The research first assessed 62 students' attitudes toward learning and using conjunctions through a questionnaire, revealing their understanding of conjunctions' importance and a willingness to learn. The primary goal was to examine if teaching conjunctions would enhance students' ability to write cohesive texts. A pre- and post- test design with 50 students from an English center in Ho Chi Minh City showed improved conjunction use and higher mean scores after instruction. The study's findings offer recommendations for teaching conjunctions and suggest further research into cohesion elements in language instruction.

Keywords : L2 Writing; Cohesion; Conjunctions; EFL Students.

References :

  1. Aarts, Bars.(2001). English Syntax and Argumentation. 2nd ed. New York: Palgrave, Print.
  2. Alhmali, R. (2007). Student attitudes in the context of the curriculum in Libyan education in middle and high schools (Doctoral dissertation, University of Glasgow).
  3. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological bulletin.
  4. Aidinlou, Nader Assadi and Reshadi, Elnaz.(2014). A Comparative Study of the Use of Conjunctions and References in Electronic Mails vs. Paper-based Letters. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. Vol. 5, No. 3. Print.
  5. Arapoff, N. (1969). Discover and transform: A method of teaching writing to foreign students. TESOL Quarterly, 3(4), 297-304.
  6. Bevans, R. (2021, August 13). A guide to experimental design. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/experimental-design/
  7. Arthur, Tom Mc.(1996). The Oxford Companion to the English Language (Cambridge Edition). Oxford University Press.
  8. Baskervill, W. M. and Sewell, J. W. (1896). An English Grammar. http://classiclit.about.com/library accessed on 1st August, 2015.
  9. Brown, G., Brown, G. D., Brown, G. R., Yule, G., & Gillian, B. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge university press.
  10. Cali, K., & Bowen, K. I. M. B. E. R. L. Y. (2003). The five features of effective writing. Chapel Hill: Learn NC.
  11. Carnie, Andrew.(2007). Syntax: A Generative Introduction, 2nd Edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  12. Carston, R. (1994). Conjunction and Pragmatics Effects. The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon, vol. 2, 692-698.
  13. Cash, J. (2022, July 9). What Is A Descriptive Research Design - ArtPoint. ArtPoint -. Retrieved September 6, 2022, from https://artpoint.org/what-is-a-descriptiveresearchdesign/#:%7E:text=A%20descriptive%20research%20design%20is%20used%20to%20describe,they%20are%20not%20typically%20used%20to%20test%20them.
  14. Castro, C. (2004). Cohesion and the social construction of meaning in the essays of Filipino college students writing in L2 English. Asia Pacific Education Review, 5(2), 215-225
  15. Chen, I. L. (2006). Using the method of fundamental solutions in conjunction with the degenerate kernel in cylindrical acoustic problems. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 29(3), 445-457.
  16. Chokwe,M.J. (2013). Factors Impacting Academic Writing Skills of English Second Language Students. Mediterrannean Journal of Social Sciences. University of South Africa: MCSER Publishing.
  17. Chuan nang luc ngoai ngu. (2018, January 22). Ministry of Education And . http://rgep.moet.gov.vn/tin-tuc/hoc-het-pho-thong-hoc-sinh-se-dat-trinh-do-bac-3-cua-khung-nang-luc-ngoai-ngu-4620.html
  18. Creswell, J. W. (2021). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (6th ed.). Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
  19. Crewe, W. J. (1990). The Ilogical of logic connectives. ELT Journal, 44(4), 316-325
  20. Crystal, David.(2008). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. 6th ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  21. De Beaugrande, R. A., & Dressler, W. U. (1981). Introduction to text linguistics (Vol. 1). London: longman.
  22. Duigu, G. (2003). Assay writing for english tests. Ecademic English Press.
  23. Gardner, R. (1985). Social Psychology and Second Language Learning the Role of Attitudes and Motivation. Great Britain: Edward Arnold Ltd
  24. Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second language learning.
  25. GCU. (2021, November 22). Quantitative Research Design Methods for Writing Dissertations. Retrieved September 6, 2022, from https://www.gcu.edu/blog/doctoral-journey/quantitative-research-design-methods-writing-dissertations
  26. Eckhard-Black, Christine.(1992). Cassel Language Guides (German): A Handbook of Grammar, Current Usage and Words, British Library Cataloguing-in-publication Data.
  27. Emad, A. (2014). Discourse markers in ESL personal narrative and argumentative papers: a qualitative and quantitative analysis. International Journal of Humanities and Social Scienc, 4(4), 294-305
  28. Ferris, D. R. (1994). Lexical and syntactic features of ESL writing by students at different levels of L2 proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 28(2), 414-420.
  29. Field, Y., & Yip Lee Mee, O. (1992). A Comparison of Internal Conjunctive Cohesion in the English Essay Writing of Cantonese Speakers and Native Speakers of English. RELC Journal, 23(1), 15-28. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1177/003368829202300102.
  30. Fraser, Bruce. (Jul, 1999). What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics 31 (7): 931-952.
  31. Halliday, M.A.K., and Hassan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman
  32. Hamed, M. (2014). Conjunctions in Argumentative Writing of Libyan Tertiary Students. English Language Teaching, 7(3), 108-120.
  33. Heino, P. (2010). Adverbial Connectors in Advanced EFL Learners’ and Native Speakers’ Student Writing. Bachelor degree project, English, Stockholms University.Writing of Cantonese Speakers and Native Speakers of English. RELC Journal, 23(1), 15-28.
  34. Hewings, M. (2013). Advanced grammar in use with answers: A self-study reference and practice book for advanced learners of english. Cambridge university press.
  35. Hill, M. G. (2006). The Official Guide to the new TOEFL Ibt. International Edition by Educational Testing Service (ETS).
  36. Huddleston, Rodney. (1988. English Grammar: An Outline. Cambridge University Press.
  37. Jin, Wenjun (2001). A quantitative study of cohesion in Chinese graduate students' writing:Variations across genres and proficiency levels. The Symposium on Second Language Writing at Purdue University, West Lafayette.
  38. Johnson, P. (1992). Cohesion and coherence in compositions in Malay and English. RELC Journal, 23(2), 1-17.
  39. Jurecic,A. (2006). Is Teaching Writing Still Possible? New Jersey Writing Alliance,pp.1- 13. http://www2.bergen.edu/njwa/NJWA-2006-materials-jurecic.pdf  Accessed on 03 March 2011.
  40. Kirkpatrick, Betty.(2007). Better English. Polskabook.
  41. Kondal, B.& Bairi, S. (2016). Use of discourse connectives in the academic writing of professional students. International Journal of English Language, Literature and Translation Studies., 143-148.
  42. Lado, R. (1964). Language Teaching, A Scientific Approach.
  43. Leech, Geoffrey and Svartvik, Jan.(1994). A Communicative Grammar of English. 3rd Edition.London: Longman.
  44. Lester, Mark.(1990). Grammar in the Classroom. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York.
  45. Leverkuhn, A. (2022, September 8). What is a T-unit? Languagehumanities. https://www.languagehumanities.org/what-is-a-t-unit.htm
  46. Leung, Carrie.(2005). A Comparison of the Use of Major English Conjunctions by American and Hong Kong University Students. LUNDS Universitet.
  47. Linderman, E. (2001). A Rhetoric for Writing Teacher. New York: Oxford University Press.
  48. Liu, M., & Braine, G. (2005). Cohesive features in argumentative writing produced by Chinese undergraduates. System, 33, 623-636.
  49. Malmkjӕr, Kirksten. (1991). The Linguistics Encyclopedia. Routledge, London and New York.
  50. Martinez, A. C. L. (2004). Discourse markers in the expository writing of Spanish university students. IBERICA,8, 63-80
  51. Martínez, A. C. L. (2015). Use of conjunctions in the compositions of secondary education students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 212, 42-46.
  52. McCombes, S. (2020, September 3). Descriptive research. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/descriptive-research/
  53. Morris, J. E. (1966). Principles of scientific and technical writing.
  54. Montana, D. E., & Kasprzyk, D. (2008). Theory of Reasoned Action, Theory of Planned Behavior and The Integrated Behavior Model. Dalam Glanz, Rimer danViswanath. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice.
  55. Murray, D. M. (1978). Write before writing. College Composition and Communication, 29(4), 375-381.
  56. Murphy, R., Viney, B., & Craven, M. (2004). English Grammar In Use with Answers and CD ROM: A Self-study Reference and Practice Book for Intermediate Students of English (Vol. 1). Cambridge university press.
  57. Murthy, J. D.(2007). Contemporary Grammar of English. Book MASTER.
  58. Neuner, J. L. (1987). Cohesive ties and chains in good and poor freshman essays. Research in the Teaching of English, 21(1), 92-105.
  59. Nippold, M. A., Schwarz, I. E., & Undlin, R. A. (1992). Use and understanding of adverbial conjuncts: A developmental study of adolescents and young adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35,108-118.
  60. Norrish, J. (1983). Language learners and their errors. London: The Macmillan Press Ltd
  61. Nunan, D. (1993). From Learning-Centeredness to Learner-Centeredness. Applied Language Learning, 4, 1-18.
  62. Ong, J. (2011). Investigating the Use of Cohesive Devices by Chinese EFL Learners. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 11(3), 42-65.
  63. Omosowe, Juba and Akindolire, Nelson.(1997). Comprehensive English Language. Johnson Publishers Limited.
  64. Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (2007). Introduction to academic writing (p. 3). Pearson/Longman.
  65. Prommas, P., & Sinwongsuwat, K. (2011). A comparative study of discourse connectors used in argumentative compositions produced by Thai EFL learners and English-native speakers. The 3rd International Conference on Humanities and Social Sciences, Prince of Songkla University
  66. Purba, D. R., & Pulungan, R. (2017). A Comparative Study Of Types Of Conjunctions Used In The Results And Discussion Section Of Students’ras And Teflin Jas Published In 2015. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 1(1), 65-73.
  67. Quirk, Randolph and Sidney Greenbaum. A University Grammar of English. London: Pearson Education Limited, 2004. Print.
  68. Richard, N. (2020). T Unit and Linguistics. ThoughtCo, Aug. 27, 2020, thoughtco.com/t-unit-definition-1692454.
  69. Rouchota, Villy. (1998). Connectives, Coherence and Relevance. Current Issues in Relevance Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  70. Sahebkheir, Farnaz and Aidinlou, Nader Asadi. “The Role of Explicit Instruction on Using Conjunctions in Iranian EFL Learners‟ Written Performance” in International Journal of Language and Linguistics. 2(2), pp.121-126. 2014. Print.
  71. Septianingrum, E. (2007). A Descriptive Study On The Students’ mastery Of Conjunctions: But, And, Or, Before, And After (Doctoral dissertation, Semarang State University).
  72. Schiffrin, Deborah. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  73. Tahsildar, M. N., & Yusoff, Z. S. (2018). Impact of Teaching Cohesive Devices on L2 Students’ Language Accuracy in Written Production. Academy Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(1), 16-28.
  74. Thornbury, S. (2005). How to teach speaking. Longman.
  75. Ting, F. (2003). An Investigation of Cohesive Errors in the Writing of PRC Tertiary EFL Students (Unpublished Master’s Thesis, National University of Singapore, Singapore).
  76. Tran, T. B.H. (2007). The use of cohesive devices in English writing [Master’s Thesis, HCM City University of Social Science and Humanity]. Contrastive Linguistics.
  77. Trupe, A. L. (2001). Formative assessment of student writing. Retrieved on 24th May 2009 from http://www.bridgewater.edu/WritingCenter/Resources/sumform.htm
  78. Uzun, K. (2018). The use of conjunctions and its relationship with argumentative writing performance in an ELT setting. Positioning English for Specific Purposes in an English Language Teaching Context, 175.
  79. Wallace,T.Stariha,W.E. and Walberg,H.J.(2004). Teaching speaking,listening and writing. Switzeland:IAE.
  80. Walshe, R. D. (1986). Writing to learn. Walshe, RD, March, P., and Jensen, D.(1986).(Eds). Writing and learning in Australia. Melbourne: Dellasta, Pty. Ltd.
  81. Zhang, A. (2000). Use of cohesive ties in relation to the quality of compositions by Chinese college students. Journal of Cambridge Studies, 5(2-3), 78-86.

A well-written work is not only grammatically correct but also cohesive and coherent. Conjunctions are fundamental to the cohesion of a text and should be taught in writing classes. This study explores the role of conjunctions in creating cohesive and coherent writing and their impact on EFL students' written production. The research first assessed 62 students' attitudes toward learning and using conjunctions through a questionnaire, revealing their understanding of conjunctions' importance and a willingness to learn. The primary goal was to examine if teaching conjunctions would enhance students' ability to write cohesive texts. A pre- and post- test design with 50 students from an English center in Ho Chi Minh City showed improved conjunction use and higher mean scores after instruction. The study's findings offer recommendations for teaching conjunctions and suggest further research into cohesion elements in language instruction.

Keywords : L2 Writing; Cohesion; Conjunctions; EFL Students.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe