Authors : Bendal, Jennymer C.

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 4 - April

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3wwm8u35

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/pef488k8

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26apr1352

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : This study determined the determine the effects on the use of story reading framework in teaching Philippine literary prose to Grade 9 students of Tabaco National High School, School Year 2025-2026. Specifically, it answered the following sub-problems: 1. What is the performance of the control and experimental groups in the pre-test along: differentiate hearing from listening and explain their role in effective communication; identify and apply the appropriate type of listening to be used in given situations; identify facts and opinions and key and relevant information presented or mentioned in materials viewed and listened to; analyze situations to identify partiality and impartiality, identify types of bias and prejudice, and tell whether a situation is biased or prejudiced; analyze the content and message of materials viewed and materials listened to; relate the message of materials viewed and listened to real-life issues, concerns, and dispositions; evaluate the validity of evidence presented in materials viewed and listened to; and react to or take a stand on critical issues presented in the materials listened to or viewed? 2. What is the performance of the control and experimental groups in the post-test along the above-mentioned competencies? 3. Is there a significant difference on the performance of the control and experimental groups in the pre-test and post-test? 4. What are the least mastered competencies of the experimental group in the post-test? 5. What literary lesson plans may be developed to address the least mastered competencies? Quasi-experimental method of research was used to determine the effects on the use of story reading framework in teaching Philippine literary prose to Grade 9 students of Tabaco National High School. The researcher utilized pre and posttest to the control and experimental group to gauge the effectiveness of the intervention provided. The performance of the two (2) groups along the different competencies were determined by getting the mean score and the corresponding performance level. The hypothesis of the study was tested using t-test for independent samples.

References :

• Books

1. John W. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th Ed.). SAGE Publications.
2. John W. Creswell, J. W. (2018). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (6^th Ed.).Pearson.
3. David Grabe, D., & Fredricka L. Stoller, F. L. (2011). Teaching and researching reading (2nd Ed.). Routledge.
4. Lev Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
5. Jean Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. International Universities Press.
6. Frederic C. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge University Press.
7. Benjamin Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Longmans.
8. Gordon Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.
9. Bienvenido Lumbera, B., & Cynthia Lumbera, C. (2005). Philippine literature: A history and anthology. Anvil Publishing.
10. Irene Fountas, I. C., & Gay Su Pinnell, G. S. (1996). Guided reading: Good first teaching for all children. Heinemann.
11. Michael Rost, M. (2016). Teaching and researching listening (3rd Ed.). Routledge.

• Journal Articles

12. Nell K. Duke, N. K., & P. David Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), what research has to say about reading instruction (3rd Ed.). International Reading Association.
13. Jennifer Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
14. John H. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.
15. Allan B. I. Bernardo, A. B. I. (2004). McKinley’s questionable bequest: Over 100 years of English in Philippine education. World Englishes, 23(1), 17–31.

• Government and Institutional Sources

16. Department of Education. (2015). DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015: Policy guidelines on classroom assessment. https://www.deped.gov.ph
17. Department of Education. (2016). DepEd Order No. 42, s. 2016: Policy guidelines on daily lesson preparation. https://www.deped.gov.ph
18. Department of Education. (2019). DepEd Order No. 21, s. 2019. https://www.deped.gov.ph
19. OECD. (2018). PISA 2018 results. https://www.oecd.org
20. OECD. (2022). PISA 2022 results. https://www.oecd.org
21. Philippine Statistics Authority. (2024). Functional Literacy, Education and Mass Media Survey (FLEMMS). https://psa.gov.ph
22. DepEd Region V. (2023). Regional literacy assessment report. Department of Education.
23. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2020). Hearing vs. listening. https://www.asha.org