⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



The Halo Effect of Health Influencers on Fruit Juice Consumption: A Quantitative Research Study


Authors : Ajit Gaikwad; Pratik Nagre

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 6 - June


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/4ebz7984

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/ys64x6p2

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jun1079

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : Background: The proliferation of health and wellness influencers on social media has created a Halo Effect where fruit beveragesregardless of actual sugar content- are viewed as inherently healthy. This is particularly problematic in an era of escalating obesity and metabolic disease.  Objective: To measure the extent and determinants of the Halo Effect around fruit juice consumption mediated by health influencers, examining the disparity between perceived and actual nutritional quality among 18-46-year-old social media users.  Methods: 320 adult participants were recruited across Instagram, YouTube and TikTok by means of stratified purposive sampling, completing a cross-sectional quantitative survey using the validated Influencer Health Halo Scale (IHHS), Nutritional Knowledge Inventory (NKI) and Social Media Literacy Scale (SMLS). Descriptives, Pearson correlation, independent samples t-test, one-way ANOVA, multiple linear regression and SEM were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics 29.0 and AMOS 29.0.

Keywords : Halo Effect, Health Influencer, Fruit Juice, Social Media Health Marketing, Consumer Behavior.

References :

  1. Boepple, L., & Thompson, J. K. (2014). A content analysis of healthy living blogs: Evidence of content thematically consistent with dysfunctional eating attitudes and behaviors. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 47(4), 362–367. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22244
  2. Boepple, L., & Thompson, J. K. (2016). A content analysis of fitspiration websites. Body Image, 17, 132–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2016.03.003
  3. Boerman, S. C., Willemsen, L. M., & Van Der Aa, E. P. (2017). "This post is sponsored": Effects of sponsorship disclosure on persuasion knowledge and electronic word of mouth in the context of Facebook. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 38, 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2016.12.002
  4. Campbell, C., & Farrell, J. R. (2020). More than meets the eye: The functional components underlying influencer marketing. Business Horizons, 63(4), 469–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2020.03.003
  5. Carrotte, E. R., Prichard, I., & Lim, M. S. C. (2017). "Fitspiration" on social media: A content analysis of gendered images. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(3), e95. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6368
  6. Chandon, P., & Wansink, B. (2007). The biasing health halos of fast-food restaurant health claims: Lower calorie estimates and higher side-dish consumption intentions. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(3), 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1086/519499
  7. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  8. DataReportal. (2024). Digital 2024: India. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2024-india
  9. De Veirman, M., Cauberghe, V., & Hudders, L. (2017). Marketing through Instagram influencers: The impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude. International Journal of Advertising, 36(5), 798–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2017.1348035
  10. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
  11. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202
  12. Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI). (2024). Nutritional information database for common beverages. Government of India. https://www.fssai.gov.in
  13. Freberg, K., Graham, K., McGaughey, K., & Freberg, L. A. (2011). Who are the social media influencers? A study of public perceptions of personality. Public Relations Review, 37(1), 90–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.11.001
  14. GBD 2017 Diet Collaborators. (2019). Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet, 393(10184), 1958–1972. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30041-8
  15. Giles, D. C. (2002). Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research. Media Psychology, 4(3), 279–305. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0403_04
  16. Gill, J. M. R., & Sattar, N. (2014). Fruit juice: Just another sugary drink? The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, 2(6), 444–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70013-0
  17. Horton, D., & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
  18. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  19. Imamura, F., O'Connor, L., Ye, Z., Mursu, J., Hayashino, Y., Bhupathiraju, S. N., & Forouhi, N. G. (2015). Consumption of sugar sweetened beverages, artificially sweetened beverages, and fruit juice and incidence of type 2 diabetes: Systematic review, meta-analysis, and estimation of population attributable fraction. BMJ, 351, h3576. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h3576
  20. Kickbusch, I., Wait, S., Maag, D., Banks, I., & MacTaggart, P. (2013). Navigating health: The role of health literacy. Alliance for Health and the Future. https://www.who.int
  21. Kozup, J. C., Creyer, E. H., & Burton, S. (2003). Making healthful food choices: The influence of health claims and nutrition information on consumers' evaluations of packaged
  22. Food products and restaurant menu items. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.67.2.19.18608
  23. Literat, I. (2014). Measuring new media literacies: Towards the development of a comprehensive assessment tool. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 6(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.23860/JMLE-2014-6-1-2
  24. Lou, C., & Yuan, S. (2019). Influencer marketing: How message value and credibility affect consumer trust of branded content on social media. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 19(1), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2018.1533501
  25. Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(4), 250–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.35.4.250
  26. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  27. Parmenter, K., & Wardle, J. (1999). Development of a general nutrition knowledge questionnaire for adults. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 53(4), 298–308. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600726
  28. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2
  29. Piernas, C., Tate, A. R., Wang, X., & Popkin, B. M. (2014). Does diet-beverage intake affect dietary consumption patterns? Results from the Choose Healthy Options Consciously Everyday (CHOICE) randomized clinical trial. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 99(3), 567–577. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.113.079087
  30. Public Health England. (2016). The Eatwell Guide: How does it differ from the Eatwell Plate and why? PHE Publications. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-eatwell-guide
  31. Schuldt, J. P., Muller, D., & Schwarz, N. (2012). The "fair trade" effect: Health halos from social ethics claims. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(5), 581–589. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611431643
  32. Statista. (2024). Number of social media users worldwide from 2017 to 2027. Statista Research Department. https://www.statista.com/statistics/278414/number-of-worldwide-social-network-users/
  33. Talati, Z., Norman, R., Pettigrew, S., Neal, B., Kelly, B., Dixon, H., & Ball, K. (2017). The impact of interpretive and reductive front-of-pack labels on food choice and attention. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 14(1), 171. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0628-2
  34. Thorndike, E. L. (1920). A constant error in psychological ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4(1), 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0071663
  35. Turner, P. G., & Lefevre, C. E. (2017). Instagram use is linked to increased symptoms of orthorexia nervosa. Eating and Weight Disorders, 22(2), 277–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-017-0364-2
  36. Wansink, B., & Chandon, P. (2006). Can "low-fat" nutrition labels lead to obesity? Journal of Marketing Research, 43(4), 605–617. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.43.4.605
  37. World Health Organization. (2015). Guideline: Sugars intake for adults and children. WHO Press. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549028
  38. World Health Organization. (2021). Health literacy: The solid facts. WHO Regional Office for Europe. https://www.who.int/europe/publications

Background: The proliferation of health and wellness influencers on social media has created a Halo Effect where fruit beveragesregardless of actual sugar content- are viewed as inherently healthy. This is particularly problematic in an era of escalating obesity and metabolic disease.  Objective: To measure the extent and determinants of the Halo Effect around fruit juice consumption mediated by health influencers, examining the disparity between perceived and actual nutritional quality among 18-46-year-old social media users.  Methods: 320 adult participants were recruited across Instagram, YouTube and TikTok by means of stratified purposive sampling, completing a cross-sectional quantitative survey using the validated Influencer Health Halo Scale (IHHS), Nutritional Knowledge Inventory (NKI) and Social Media Literacy Scale (SMLS). Descriptives, Pearson correlation, independent samples t-test, one-way ANOVA, multiple linear regression and SEM were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics 29.0 and AMOS 29.0.

Keywords : Halo Effect, Health Influencer, Fruit Juice, Social Media Health Marketing, Consumer Behavior.

Paper Submission Last Date
31 - July - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe