Authors :
Duaa Hijazi; Emran Alzubi; Mona Omran
Volume/Issue :
Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 9 - September
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/yck8hxxd
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/y6pv5jw9
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24SEP1298
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
The COVID-19 pandemic significantly
impacted global stock markets, leading to unprecedented
volatility and legal challenges. This study explores how
the pandemic altered trading behavior and examines the
associated legal ramifications. In March 2020, stock
markets experienced a sharp decline, prompting the U.S.
Federal Reserve and other regulatory bodies to
intervene. While markets rebounded, volatility persisted,
introducing heightened risks for investors. Non-
professional investors became more active, complicating
regulatory oversight.
From a legal perspective, the pandemic raised
concerns about stock price manipulation, insider
trading, and market abuse. Regulators, like the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), responded
by implementing temporary measures to maintain
market integrity. These legal frameworks, designed for
traditional crises, struggled to address the unique
challenges posed by COVID-19.
Furthermore, the pandemic revealed gaps in
existing laws, prompting calls for updated regulations to
manage market disruptions during non-financial crises.
The study underscores the need for ongoing legal
adaptation to safeguard markets and prevent
exploitation during global emergencies. As the pandemic
evolved, so did the legal landscape, with cases emerging
that highlighted both opportunistic trading and
regulatory inadequacies. This research contributes to
understanding the intersection of market volatility and
legal frameworks in times of crisis.
Keywords :
COVID-19 Pandemic, Stock Market Volatility, Insider Trading, Regulatory Frameworks, Market Manipulation, Legal Implications.
References :
- López-Cabarcos, M. Á., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Pineiro-Chousa, J. (2020). All that glitters is not gold. The rise of gaming in the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(4), 289-296. sciencedirect.com
- Kose, M. A., Sugawara, N., & Terrones, M. E. (2020). Global recessions. econstor.eu
- Liu, M., Choo, W. C., & Lee, C. C. (2020). The response of the stock market to the announcement of global pandemic. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade. [HTML]
- Jabeen, S., Farhan, M., Zaka, M. A., Fiaz, M., & Farasat, M. (2022). COVID and world stock markets: A comprehensive discussion. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 763346. frontiersin.org
- Solimini, R., Busardò, F. P., Gibelli, F., Sirignano, A., & Ricci, G. (2021). Ethical and Legal Challenges of Telemedicine in the Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Medicina. mdpi.com
- Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., Suman, R., & Khan, S. (2022). A review of Blockchain Technology applications for financial services. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 2(3), 100073. sciencedirect.com
- Lehar, A. & Parlour, C. A. (2021). Decentralized exchanges. Available at SSRN. ewfs.org
- Mosteanu, N. R. & Faccia, A. (2020). Digital systems and new challenges of financial management–FinTech, XBRL, blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Quality–Access to Success. coventry.ac.uk
- Renneboog, L., & Szilagyi, P. G. (2020). How relevant is dividend policy under low shareholder protection?. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 64, 100776. tilburguniversity.edu
- Zhou, J., Jin, Y., & Liang, Q. (2022). Effects of regulatory policy mixes on traceability adoption in wholesale markets: Food safety inspection and information disclosure. Food Policy. archive.org
- Aslam, F., Aziz, S., Nguyen, D. K., Mughal, K. S., & Khan, M. (2020). On the efficiency of foreign exchange markets in times of the COVID-19 pandemic. Technological forecasting and social change, 161, 120261. sciencedirect.com
- Blackburne, T., Kepler, J. D., Quinn, P. J., & Taylor, D. (2021). Undisclosed SEC investigations. Management Science, 67(6), 3403-3418. upenn.edu
- Kizys, R., Tzouvanas, P., & Donadelli, M. (2021). From COVID-19 herd immunity to investor herding in international stock markets: The role of government and regulatory restrictions. International Review of Financial Analysis, 74, 101663. nih.gov
- Chowdhury, E. K., Dhar, B. K., & Stasi, A. (2022). Volatility of the US stock market and business strategy during COVID‐19. Business Strategy & Development, 5(4), 350-360. researchgate.net
- O’Donnell, N., Shannon, D., & Sheehan, B. (2021). Immune or at-risk? Stock markets and the significance of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 30, 100477. sciencedirect.com
- Corbet, S., Hou, Y. G., Hu, Y., Oxley, L., & Xu, D. (2021). Pandemic-related financial market volatility spillovers: Evidence from the Chinese COVID-19 epicentre. International Review of Economics & Finance, 71, 55-81. sciencedirect.com
- Kassamany, T. & Zgheib, B. (2023). Impact of government policy responses of COVID‐19 pandemic on stock market liquidity for Australian companies. Australian Economic Papers. nih.gov
- Shaikh, I. & Huynh, T. L. D. (2022). Does disease outbreak news impact equity, commodity and foreign exchange market? Investors' fear of the pandemic COVID-19. Journal of Economic Studies. researchgate.net
- Barai, M. K. & Dhar, S. (2024). COVID-19 pandemic: Inflicted costs and some emerging global issues. Global Business Review. sagepub.com
- Reitano, T. & Shaw, M. (2021). Criminal contagion: How Mafias, gangsters and scammers profit from a pandemic. [HTML]
- Uddin, M., Chowdhury, A., Anderson, K., & Chaudhuri, K. (2021). The effect of COVID–19 pandemic on global stock market volatility: Can economic strength help to manage the uncertainty?. Journal of Business Research, 128, 31-44. nih.gov
- Bekkers, E. & Koopman, R. B. (2022). Simulating the trade effects of the COVID‐19 pandemic: Scenario analysis based on quantitative trade modelling. The World Economy. nih.gov
- Brogaard, J., Le, N., Nguyen, D. D., & Sila, V. (2024). Does shareholder litigation risk cause public firms to delist? Evidence from securities class action lawsuits. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 59(4), 1726-1759. cambridge.org
- Buccola, V. S. J. (2023). Sponsor control: a new paradigm for corporate reorganization. U. Chi. L. Rev.. uchicago.edu
- Moloney, N. (2023). EU securities and financial markets regulation. [HTML]
- Inama, S. (2022). Rules of origin in international trade. [HTML]
The COVID-19 pandemic significantly
impacted global stock markets, leading to unprecedented
volatility and legal challenges. This study explores how
the pandemic altered trading behavior and examines the
associated legal ramifications. In March 2020, stock
markets experienced a sharp decline, prompting the U.S.
Federal Reserve and other regulatory bodies to
intervene. While markets rebounded, volatility persisted,
introducing heightened risks for investors. Non-
professional investors became more active, complicating
regulatory oversight.
From a legal perspective, the pandemic raised
concerns about stock price manipulation, insider
trading, and market abuse. Regulators, like the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), responded
by implementing temporary measures to maintain
market integrity. These legal frameworks, designed for
traditional crises, struggled to address the unique
challenges posed by COVID-19.
Furthermore, the pandemic revealed gaps in
existing laws, prompting calls for updated regulations to
manage market disruptions during non-financial crises.
The study underscores the need for ongoing legal
adaptation to safeguard markets and prevent
exploitation during global emergencies. As the pandemic
evolved, so did the legal landscape, with cases emerging
that highlighted both opportunistic trading and
regulatory inadequacies. This research contributes to
understanding the intersection of market volatility and
legal frameworks in times of crisis.
Keywords :
COVID-19 Pandemic, Stock Market Volatility, Insider Trading, Regulatory Frameworks, Market Manipulation, Legal Implications.