Authors :
Udotim, Akerete Anthony
Volume/Issue :
Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 10 - October
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/4kjkd8v9
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/5n9xzbzm
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25oct600
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.
Abstract :
The study examined the imperative of agriculture for development administration in Nigeria. It studied various
agricultural programmes of governments and administrations in Nigeria which shows that the programmes remained
unsuccessful due to many factors such as lack of involvement of the rural and the beneficiaries of such programmes,
corruption, haphazard formulation and implementation of programmes of agriculture amongst others, proposing three
approaches that could revamp the agricultural sector and bring about the needed development. The three approaches: the
Provision of Market and Mechanism for Export (PMME), Massive Self Involvement (MSI) and Gentleman Farmer
Approach (GFA) are viable and more practical approaches that can be adopted by Nigeria and any other country for
viable pursuit of agriculture as business to boost the GDP of any country. The study made use of secondary source of data
collection and contextual/descriptive method of data analysis. The method allows for analysis of various programmes and
policies in agriculture in Nigeria to assess the viability of the three proposed approaches to agriculture for national
development. It revealed that agricultural programmes and policies should have the nature of musa paradisiaca, a plantain
theory of sustainable development. The study stem from the fact that Nigeria is blessed with favourable weather and
climatic conditions, natural resources, fertile soil, abundant land that could she can exploit to bring about economic
Eldorado.
Keywords :
Agriculture, Administration, Development, PMME, MSI, GFA, Programmes, Policies.
References :
- Agber, T., Iortima, P.I and Imbur, E.N, ‘Lessons from Implementation of Nigeria’s Past National Agricultural Programs for the Transformation Agenda’ in American Journal of Research Communication. www.usa-journals.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Agber1_Vol110.pdf. 3/23/2017. 239 in Iwuchukwu J .C. and Igbokwe E.M. (2012), Lessons from Agricultural Policies and Programmes in Nigeria, Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization ISSN 2224-3240 (Paper) ISSN 2224-3259 (Online).
- Afolayan, S.O. (1997), Effect of irrigation frequency on soil moisture potential and fruit yield of okra (Abelmoschuss esculentus. Paper presented at the 15th annual conference of HORTSON held at NIHORH, Ibadan: April 8-11, 1997.
- Amalu, U.C. (1998), Agricultural Research and Extension Delivery systems in Sub-Saharan Africa, Calabar: University of Calabar Press.
- Asiabaka, C.C. (2002), Agricultural Extension; A Handbook for Development Practitioners.
- Omoku, River State: Molsystem United Services.
- Ayoola, G.B. (2001), Essays on the Agricultural Economy 1: A Book of Readings on Agricultural Development Policy and Administration in Nigeria: Ibadan: TMA Publishers.
- Dayo Phillip, Ephraim Nkonya, John Pender and Omobowale Ayoola Oni (2009). Constraints to Increasing Agricultural Productivity in Nigeria: A Review. Nigeria Strategy Support Program (NSSP). Background Paper No. NSSP 006. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington D.C., U.S.A. September 2009.
- Eminue, O. E. (2005), Public Policy Analysis and Decision Making, concept publication Limited, Lagos.
- Felix Richer, (2025), Food Insecurity Affects More Thana Quarter of Humanity, July 29, 2025, statista.com.
- Frank, E. O. (2015), Plantain theory of sustainable development, Journal of Sustainable Development Studies, 8 (2), 294-316
- Iwuchukwu J .C. and Igbokwe E.M. (2012), Lessons from Agricultural Policies and Programmes in Nigeria, Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization ISSN 2224-3240 (Paper) ISSN 2224-3259 (Online) Vol 5, 2012
- Olatunji, S.O. (2005), Monitoring and evaluation of Agricultural Extension programmes. In: Nwachukwu.I.and Onuekwusi G. (eds.) Agricultural Extension and Rural Sociology. Enugu: Snap press Ltd. 287-306.
- Udotim, A. A (2017), Leadership-induced poverty and the new face of leadership in Nigeria: An ethical perspective, unpublished manuscript.
- Yusuf, I. E. and Francis, J. T. (2019), Agricultural programmes and food security in Nigeria (1960-2016). A historical overview, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353225217
The study examined the imperative of agriculture for development administration in Nigeria. It studied various
agricultural programmes of governments and administrations in Nigeria which shows that the programmes remained
unsuccessful due to many factors such as lack of involvement of the rural and the beneficiaries of such programmes,
corruption, haphazard formulation and implementation of programmes of agriculture amongst others, proposing three
approaches that could revamp the agricultural sector and bring about the needed development. The three approaches: the
Provision of Market and Mechanism for Export (PMME), Massive Self Involvement (MSI) and Gentleman Farmer
Approach (GFA) are viable and more practical approaches that can be adopted by Nigeria and any other country for
viable pursuit of agriculture as business to boost the GDP of any country. The study made use of secondary source of data
collection and contextual/descriptive method of data analysis. The method allows for analysis of various programmes and
policies in agriculture in Nigeria to assess the viability of the three proposed approaches to agriculture for national
development. It revealed that agricultural programmes and policies should have the nature of musa paradisiaca, a plantain
theory of sustainable development. The study stem from the fact that Nigeria is blessed with favourable weather and
climatic conditions, natural resources, fertile soil, abundant land that could she can exploit to bring about economic
Eldorado.
Keywords :
Agriculture, Administration, Development, PMME, MSI, GFA, Programmes, Policies.