⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



The Incidence and Evaluation of Quality Indicators for Patient Safety Across the Total Testing Process in the Clinical Laboratory


Authors : Patricia Aboagye Boateng

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 8 - August


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/yubvshbv

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/mzw2yv48

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26aug525

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : Introduction: Quality indicators (QIs) are useful evaluation tools that enable the identification of clinical laboratory performance levels and can be used to assess critical healthcare dimensions depending on the objective measures. Standardized and recognized QIs are used to monitor clinical laboratory errors and to manage the risk in diagnostic testing (Grecu et al., 2014, as cited in Alshaghdali et al., 2022).  Aim: The aim of this secondary research is to review the frequency of clinical laboratory errors and to determine the need to continually conduct critical research on the analytical stage even in the phase of automation and modern technologies.  Method: Literature searches were conducted through Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus and Scielo to retrieve studies published from 10 years ago but only 9 studies from year 2020 were used for the analysis. Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) tool was used to select the studies based on predefined criteria.

Keywords : Preanalytical Errors, Analytical Errors, Post-Analytical Errors, Total Testing Process, Non-Conformances, Clinical Laboratory.

References :

  1. Abdollahi, A., Saffar, H., & Saffar, H. (2014). Types and frequency of errors during different phases of testing at a clinical medical laboratory of a teaching hospital in Tehran, Iran. North American Journal of Medical Sciences, 6(5), 224–228.
  2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2025). Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs): Recommendations to update the PSIs. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
  3. Al Naam, Y. A., Elsafi, S., Al Jahdali, M. H., Al Shaman, R. S., Al Qurouni, B. H., & Al Zahrani, E. M. (2022). The impact of total automation on the clinical laboratory workforce: A case study. Journal of Healthcare Leadership, 14, 55–62. https://doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S362614
  4. Al‑Faraeh, W., & Ababneh, M. F. (2018). The detection and prevention of errors in clinical laboratory. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 8(11), 352.
  5. Al‑Fehaid, A. S., Hazazi, A. M. A., & Mandil, H. N. H. (2024). Factors affecting the accuracy and reliability of laboratory test results. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour.
  6. Alghamdi, Y. M. A. B., Albraa, S. F., Saad, M. A., Ahmed, S. A., Jameel, B. A., Faisal, O. A., Loai, A. H., Abdulmajeed, A. A. (2024). Pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical errors in clinical laboratory testing: A systematic review of causes and prevention strategies. Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research, 3361–3375. https://doi.org/10.63278/jicrcr.vi.3220
  7. Alshaghdali, K., Alcantara, T. Y., Rezgui, R., Cruz, C. P., Alshammary, M. H., Almotairi, Y. A., & Alcantara, J. C. (2022). Detecting preanalytical errors using quality indicators in a hematology laboratory. Quality Management in Health Care, 31(3), 176–183. | DOI: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000343
  8. Bhalkar, M. S., Bhadre, R. B., & Hajirnis, K. A. (2022). Detection and learning from clinical laboratory errors: A performance improvement methodology. Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry, 33(S1), S29. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A737698495/HRCA?u=anon~7457feb5&sid=googleScholar&xid=715857cc
  9. Biosero (2026). How to reduce laboratory errors with automation.  https://biosero.com/blog/how-to-reduce-laboratory-errors-with-automation
  10. Cepull, T. (2025, May 27). Six Cs of lab quality that ensure reliable testing: Achieve reliable lab testing and better diagnostics by applying the six Cs of lab quality. Lab Manager. Six Cs of Lab Quality That Ensure Reliable Testing | Lab Manager
  11. Chaudhry, A. S., Inata, Y., & Nakagami-Yamaguchi, E. (2023). Quality analysis of the clinical laboratory literature and its effectiveness on clinical quality improvement: a systematic review. Journal of clinical biochemistry and nutrition73(2), 108–115. https://doi.org/10.3164/jcbn.23-22
  12. Cichocki, A. (2025, April 4). The importance of laboratory quality and how to achieve It: Tips and tools to ensure quality standards are met in the lab. Lab Manager. The Importance of Laboratory Quality and How to Achieve It | Lab Manager
  13. De Guire, V., Galoro, C. A. O., Ibarz, M., Ivanov, A., Lippi, G., Zhou, R., Sciacovelli, L., Sengupta Neogi, S., Shaw, J., Shcolnik, W., Smeets, R. L., Sumarac, Z., Vermeersch, P., Von Meyer, A., & Plebani, M. (2025). Recommendations from the IFCC Working Group on laboratory errors and patient safety for the global adoption of an   essential quality indicators panel in laboratory medicine. Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine64(4), 806–812. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2025-1462
  14. Guo, Y., Dai, W., Jiang, Y., & Liu, X. (2025). Analysis and actions after laboratory errors in a Chinese university hospital. BMC Health Services Research, 25(1), 1296. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13320-5
  1. Kouser, S., Abbas, F. F., Huda, N., Pahore, Z., Khurram, S., Qureshi, H., Majeed, M., Akram, O., Rabbani, W., Hassan, S., & Khan, M. (2023). Review of key performance indicators in a hematology laboratory: A preventable source of error. Journal of Liaquat University of Medical & Health Sciences. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.22442/jlumhs.2023.00985
  2. Kutcher, A. M., & LeBaron, V. T. (2022). A simple guide for completing an integrative review using an example article. Journal of Professional Nursing, 40, 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2022.02.004
  3. León Bajaña, L. A., Cevallos Valencia, C. A., & Quimis Merchán, R. W. (2024). Prevention and control of adverse events in the clinical laboratory process: A literature review. Espirales Revista Multidisciplinaria de Investigación, 8(49). https://www.revistaespirales.com/index.php/es/article/view/863
  4. Lin, Y., Spies, N., Zohner, K., McCoy, D., Zaydman, M., & Farnsworth, C. (2025). Pre-analytical phase errors constitute the vast majority of errors in clinical laboratory testing. Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, 63. 10.1515/cclm-2025-0190.
  5. McBride, S. E., Rogers, W. A., & Fisk, A. D. (2014). Understanding human error in automation: A review of error management strategies. Human Factors, 56(3), 475–489. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720813495273
  6. Mehndiratta, M., Pasha, E. H., Chandra, N., & Almeida, E. A. (2021). Quality indicators for evaluating errors in the preanalytical phase. Journal of Laboratory Physicians, 13(2), 169–174. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1729473
  7. Mishra, A., & Beena, K. V. (2024). A bibliometric analysis of the errors and mistakes in the medical laboratory. Amrita Journal of Medicine, 20, 136–143. https://doi.org/10.4103/AMJM.AMJM_41_24
  8. Mohammed, N. S. M. (2024). Advancements in diagnostic technology: The role of automation in modern medical laboratories. African Journal of Advanced Pure and Applied Sciences, 3(4), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.65418/ajapas.v3i4.996
  9. Patel, D.S., Darji, H., Panchal, K.R., Rathod, K.J. (2026). Evaluation of non-conformances in the total testing process of a NABL-accredited clinical biochemistry laboratory: An observational study. J Clin of Diagn Res. 20(3), BC19-BC23.         https://www.doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2026/85000/22571
  10. Pienaar, J., Tsheola, E., & Kruger, W. (2024). Analysis of internal audit non‑conformances at non‑accredited laboratories. Journal of Medical Laboratory Science & Technology of South Africa, 2, Article 246. https://doi.org/10.36303/JMLSTSA.246
  1. Plebani, M., Aita, A., & Sciacovelli, L. (2020). Patient safety in laboratory medicine. In L. Donaldson, et al. (Eds.), Textbook of patient safety and clinical risk management (pp. 325–338). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59403-9_24
  2. Roy, A. D., & Das, D. (2019). An evaluation of the errors occurring in pathology and microbiology laboratories of a tertiary care teaching hospital and their root cause analyses. Journal of Health Research and Reviews, 6(3), 102–106. 
  3. Sodavadiya, K. B., Rajput, A. S., Patel, N. R., & Patel, S. M. (2023). Impact of developing and implementing nonconformance management system at clinical biochemistry laboratory section of tertiary care hospital run by government of Gujarat, India. Panacea Journal of Medical Sciences, 13(2), 396–401. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.pjms.2023.076
  4. Tarekegn, N., Mamo, A. G., Abdulsemed, K. A., Abdlshikure, S. A., & Mekonnen, Z. (2025). Evaluating the total laboratory testing process and performance via quality indicators in clinical chemistry and hematology laboratories at Pawi General Hospital, Benishangul Gumz, Northwest Ethiopia: A prospective cross‑sectional study. Discover Health Systems, 4, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44250-025-00260-4
  5. van Moll, C., Egberts, T., Wagner, C., Zwaan, L., & Ten Berg, M. (2023). The nature, causes, and clinical impact of errors in the clinical laboratory testing process leading to diagnostic error: A voluntary incident report analysis. Journal of Patient Safety, 19(8), 573–579.
  6. World Health Organization. (2023, September 11). Patient safety. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/patient-safety

Introduction: Quality indicators (QIs) are useful evaluation tools that enable the identification of clinical laboratory performance levels and can be used to assess critical healthcare dimensions depending on the objective measures. Standardized and recognized QIs are used to monitor clinical laboratory errors and to manage the risk in diagnostic testing (Grecu et al., 2014, as cited in Alshaghdali et al., 2022).  Aim: The aim of this secondary research is to review the frequency of clinical laboratory errors and to determine the need to continually conduct critical research on the analytical stage even in the phase of automation and modern technologies.  Method: Literature searches were conducted through Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus and Scielo to retrieve studies published from 10 years ago but only 9 studies from year 2020 were used for the analysis. Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) tool was used to select the studies based on predefined criteria.

Keywords : Preanalytical Errors, Analytical Errors, Post-Analytical Errors, Total Testing Process, Non-Conformances, Clinical Laboratory.

Paper Submission Last Date
31 - August - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe