Authors :
Hargono Hargono; Adista Zuhrah; Rafi Hafizh Azizi
Volume/Issue :
Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 10 - October
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/yx33wcfx
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/9jwukcxs
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24OCT1370
Abstract :
Coal is a limited natural resource and is found
in certain geological locations. Indonesia has abundant
mineral and coal resources, with fairly good quality and
quantity. The use of coal as fuel has an impact on the
environment because CO2 emissions resulting from
burning coal can cause a greenhouse effect. One solution
to the problem of using coal is the production of
alternative energy in the form of briquettes from
biomass. This research aims to study the effect of adding
a mixture of bagasse, rice husks and coconut shells on the
calorific value. The carbon and hydrogen content in
biomass greatly influences the water content of the
briquettes produced. The increase in carbon content is
generally inversely proportional to water content.
Briquettes from coconut shell biomass have a higher
carbon content than those from rice husks and sugar cane
bagasse. The highest calorific value was obtained from
coconut shell biomass briquettes, namely 5280.85 cal/g,
because briquettes from coconut shells had the highest
carbon content, namely 57.18% compared to the carbon
content of rice husks and sugar cane bagasse, namely 37
respectively. 24 and 50.04%. Carbon is one of the main
components that influences the energy value of
briquettes. Although the hydrogen content also
contributes to the heating value, its impact is not as big as
the carbon content in biomass. The elemental composition
of CHNS can affect the water content and calorific value
produced. Briquettes from this biomass are only suitable
for use as fuel for household purposes.
Keywords :
Alternative Energy, Biobriquettes, Biomass, Briquette Quality
References :
- M. C. Friederich, T. A. Moore, and R. M. Flores, “A regional review and new insights into SE Asia Cenozoic coalbearing sediments: Why does Indonesia have such extensive coal deposits?,” Int. J. Coal Geol, 2016.
- A. Raihan, M. Islam, D. Ahmed, S. Farhana, O. Faruk, and A. Paul, “Innovation and Green Development The role of renewable energy use , technological innovation , and forest cover toward green development : Evidence from Indonesia,” Innov. Green Dev., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 100035, 2023.
- S. E. Ibitoye, R. M. Mahamood, T. Jen, C. Loha, and E. T. Akinlabi, “An overview of biomass solid fuels : Biomass sources , processing methods , and morphological and microstructural properties,” J. Bioresour. Bioprod., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 333–360, 2023.
- M. S. Roni and S. Chowdhury, “Biomass Co-Firing Technology with Policies , Challenges , and Opportunities : A Global Review,” no. 662.
- E. Rianawati, S. Sagala, I. Hafiz, and J. Anhorn, “The potential of Biogas in Energy Transition in Indonesia The potential of Biogas in Energy Transition in Indonesia,” 2021.
- T. Battle, U. Srivastava, J. Kopfle, and R. Hunter, Chapter 1.2 - The Direct Reduction of Iron, 1st ed., vol. 3. Elsevier Ltd., 2014.
- N. Arena, J. Lee, and R. Clift, “Life Cycle Assessment of activated carbon production from coconut shells,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 125, pp. 68–77, 2016.
- A. Magdziarz, I. Kalemba-rec, and M. Szyma, “Upgrading of green waste into carbon-rich solid biofuel by hydrothermal carbonization : The effect of process parameters on hydrochar derived from acacia,” vol. 202, 2020.
- V. Siipola, T. Tamminen, and R. Kupila, “Effects of Biomass Type , Carbonization Process , and Activated Carbons,” June, 2018.
- P. T. Bridgeman, T. G., Jones, J. M., Shield, I., & Williams, “Torrefaction of reed canary grass, wheat straw and willow to enhance solid fuel qualities and combustion properties,” Fuel, vol. 87(6), pp. 844–856, 2010.
- W. Chen, J. Peng, and X. T. Bi, “A state-of-the-art review of biomass torrefaction , densi fi cation and applications,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 44, pp. 847–866, 2015.
- V. Dhyani and T. Bhaskar, “A comprehensive review on the pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass,” Renew. Energy, 2017.
Coal is a limited natural resource and is found
in certain geological locations. Indonesia has abundant
mineral and coal resources, with fairly good quality and
quantity. The use of coal as fuel has an impact on the
environment because CO2 emissions resulting from
burning coal can cause a greenhouse effect. One solution
to the problem of using coal is the production of
alternative energy in the form of briquettes from
biomass. This research aims to study the effect of adding
a mixture of bagasse, rice husks and coconut shells on the
calorific value. The carbon and hydrogen content in
biomass greatly influences the water content of the
briquettes produced. The increase in carbon content is
generally inversely proportional to water content.
Briquettes from coconut shell biomass have a higher
carbon content than those from rice husks and sugar cane
bagasse. The highest calorific value was obtained from
coconut shell biomass briquettes, namely 5280.85 cal/g,
because briquettes from coconut shells had the highest
carbon content, namely 57.18% compared to the carbon
content of rice husks and sugar cane bagasse, namely 37
respectively. 24 and 50.04%. Carbon is one of the main
components that influences the energy value of
briquettes. Although the hydrogen content also
contributes to the heating value, its impact is not as big as
the carbon content in biomass. The elemental composition
of CHNS can affect the water content and calorific value
produced. Briquettes from this biomass are only suitable
for use as fuel for household purposes.
Keywords :
Alternative Energy, Biobriquettes, Biomass, Briquette Quality