Authors : Belvin Keitany; Nehemiah Kiplagat; Ronald Cheprkilot

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 8 - August

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/ykapd89k

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/yc3pn6jc

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25aug682

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.

Abstract : This study examined the influence of stakeholder engagement on service delivery within Kenya’s county governments, guided by Stakeholder Theory. The theory emphasizes the importance of inclusive governance and the integration of diverse stakeholder interests in public decision-making. Adopting a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design, the study first collected quantitative data through structured questionnaires distributed to 243 county officials across 17 counties, achieving a high response rate of 83.4%. Qualitative insights were gathered through interviews to contextualize the statistical results. The analysis employed descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and simple linear regression to test the hypothesis that stakeholder engagement significantly influences service delivery. Descriptive findings revealed moderately high levels of stakeholder engagement in strategic integrated development planning (SIDP), with key dimensions including inclusive dialogues, transparent communication, and collaborative decision-making. Correlation analysis showed a strong positive relationship between stakeholder engagement and service delivery (r = 0.732, p < .001). Regression results confirmed that stakeholder engagement significantly predicted service delivery outcomes (β = 0.732, B = 0.692, t = 13.722, p < .001), with the model explaining 53.6% of the variance (R2 = 0.536). ANOVA findings further validated the model’s statistical significance (F = 188.27, p < .001).The study concludes that robust stakeholder engagement enhances transparency, responsiveness, and efficiency in county government service delivery. It recommends the institutionalization of inclusive engagement frameworks, improved communication strategies, capacity building, and strengthened legal provisions to support participatory governance. These measures are crucial for fostering trust, accountability, and sustainable development within Kenya’s devolved governance structures.

Keywords : Stakeholder, Engagement, Service, Delivery, County, Government.

References :

1. Agyemang, F. S., & Ofei, S. B. (2013). Employee work engagement and organizational commitment: A comparative study of private and public sector organizations in Ghana. European Journal of Business and Innovation Research, 1(4), 20–33.
2. Andrews, M., Pritchett, L., & Woolcock, M. (2017). Building state capability: Evidence, analysis, action. Oxford University Press.
3. Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2017). Designing and implementing cross‐sector collaborations: Needed and challenging. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12432
4. Commission on Revenue Allocation. (2020). County performance report. https://www.crakenya.org
5. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman Publishing.
6. Gisselquist, R. M. (2012). Good governance as a concept, and why this matters for development policy. United Nations University Working Paper No. 2012/30. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2144504
7. Gitonga, D. W., & Nzulwa, J. (2019). Influence of performance management strategies on service delivery at Kenya School of Government. International Journal of Current Aspects, 3(III), 220–236.
8. Institute of Economic Affairs. (2020). Public participation in county governments in Kenya: A review of practices and the way forward. https://ieakenya.or.ke/
9. Khan, F., Yu, Z., & Hussain, M. (2018). Stakeholder engagement and water sustainability: A case study of Pakistan. Sustainability, 10(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020417
10. Li, Y., Wang, Y., & Zhang, X. (2023). Government–nonprofit collaboration in social service delivery: A Q-methodology analysis. Public Management Review, 25(3), 431–451.
11. Lowndes, V., Pratchett, L., & Stoker, G. (2006). Local political participation: The impact of rules-in-use. Public Administration, 84(3), 539–561.
12. Mwenda, A. M., & Muigua, K. (2016). Enhancing access to justice through stakeholder engagement in Kenya. Kenya Law Review Journal, 6(2), 44–58.
13. Nabatchi, T., & Amsler, L. B. (2014). Direct public engagement in local government. American Review of Public Administration, 44(4_suppl), 63S–88S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074013519702
14. Office of the Auditor-General. (2021). Audit reports on county governments. https://www.oagkenya.go.ke
15. Okeke, M. N., & Ugwu, A. (2019). Stakeholder engagement and quality of healthcare service delivery in Nigeria. International Journal of Health Economics and Policy, 4(2), 47–55.
16. Orina, J., Moronge, M., & Guyo, W. (2024). Stakeholder engagement strategies and service delivery in Kenyan counties. African Journal of Governance and Development, 13(1), 88–105.
17. Republic of Kenya. (2010). The Constitution of Kenya, 2010. National Council for Law Reporting.
18. Republic of Kenya. (2012). County Governments Act No. 17 of 2012. National Council for Law Reporting.
19. Republic of Kenya. (2018). County Integrated Development Planning Guidelines (CIPD Guidelines). Ministry of Devolution and ASALs.
20. World Bank. (2019). Engaging citizens for improved development results in Kenya. https://documents.worldbank.org
21. Zwane, E., & Matsiliza, N. S. (2022). Barriers to stakeholder engagement in municipal service delivery: A case of eDumbe Municipality. Africa’s Public Service Delivery and Performance Review, 10(1), 1–8.
22. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
23. Kanyinga, K., & Long, J. D. (2012). The political economy of reforms in Kenya: The post-2007 election violence and a new constitution. African Studies Review, 55(1), 31–51.
24. Mugabi, E., Namubiru, R., & Otim, S. (2019). Decentralisation and service delivery in Uganda: The role of local governments. Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research, 11(2), 13–22.
25. Nutty, D. D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: What can be done? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 301–314.
26. Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.