Authors : Chanyanat Krimjai

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 5 - May

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/2h5zjae2

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/5ahj55ve

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24MAY2509

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : The objectives of this research are (1) to study reputation management in the digital age (2) to study the relationship of public relations in framing public opinion. and the impact on business compliance to be applied in the current business this research is quantitative research. Using the random sampling method. is a total of 1,000 people in Bangkok. Random sample of 515 people in Bangkok the tool used to collect data is a questionnaire. The statistics used in this research are the percentage (percentage) to measure the personal characteristics of the respondents, the mean (Mean) and standard deviation. (SD.) and analysis of Pearson Product Moment Coefficient of Correlation. The results of the research found that there is a relationship between public relations in the preparation of the public opinion framework (Y4) and the impact on business compliance. To be connected within the current commerce, it was found that the Promoting Open Relations (MPR) procedure of the declaration (X1) had a P-value of 0.000. Includes a esteem less than 0.05 (0.000 < 0.05). Organizing events or uncommon exercises (X2) features a P-value break even with to 0.000. Encompasses a esteem less than 0.05 (0.000 < 0.05). Organizing community exercises (X4) features a P-value. Rise to 0.000 is less than 0.05 (0.000 < 0.05) Exercises that have a influential nature (X6) Exercises or activities that appear Mindful of social and environmental obligation (X7) features a P-value of 0.000, incorporates a P-value of 0.000, encompasses a esteem less than 0.05 (0.000 < 0.05) That's , dismiss the essential speculation Ho and acknowledge the auxiliary theory H1. This may be composed within the shape of relapse investigation as takes after: Y=-0.430 + 0.308(X3) + 0.573(X5)

Keywords : Reputation Management, Digital Age, Public Relations, Business Consistency.

References :

1. Ilya, A., Bykov., Julia, D., Akhmedova. (2022). Reputation Management as an Applied Communication Technology in Digital Society.   doi: 10.1109/comsds55328.2022.9769117.
2. Yulia, Chyrva., A., Zaverbnyj. (2022). Features of the formation of the reputation management system in the conditions of the development of internet technologies. Menedžment ta pìdpriêmnictvo v Ukraïnì: etapi stanovlennâ ì problemi rozvitku,  doi: 10.23939/smeu2022.02.121.
3. Clea, Bourne. (2022). Public Relations and the Digital.   doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-13956-7.
4. Zeynep, Genel., Sevinç, Koçak. (2022). The Components of Reputation: Evaluation of Communication Professional’s Online Reputation Approaches. İletişim kuram ve araştırma dergisi,  doi: 10.47998/ikad.1134116
5. Ben, Medeiros. (2019). Evaluating the Reputation Management Industry through the Lens of Public Relations Ethics.   Available from: 10.1080/23736992.2019.1638261
6. Ze, Zook. (2022). Public Relations Auditing and Accountability With Digitalised Decentralised Ecosystems. Advances in finance, accounting, and economics book series,  doi: 10.4018/978-1-6684-4595-2.ch010.
7. W., T., Disney., J., Chase. (2022). Impacts of Public Relations on Corporate Reputation. Journal of Digital Marketing and Communication,  doi: 10.53623/jdmc.v2i1.82
8. Olga, Rink. (2020). Reputation Management and a Corporate Identity: Transition to Digital Platforms.   doi: 10.4018/978-1-7998-2011-6.CH003.  
9. Khoirun, Nisa., Effy, Zalfiana, Rusfian., Zaenab, Zaenab. (2019). Managing Government Digital Reputation through Big Data Processing.   doi: 10.22146/JKAP.31810, 
10. Farhan, Al, Olaimat., Mohammed, Habes., Ali, Yahya, Al, Hadeed., Marcelle, Issa, Al, Jwaniat. (2022). Reputation management through social networking platforms for PR purposes: A SEM-based study in the Jordan. Frontiers in Communication,  doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2022.1009359
11. João, Rodrigues. (2023). Publicity, Transparency, and Openness in Public Administration. Revista de Derecho,  doi: 10.14482/dere.58.004.223
12. Lecturer, Shahlaa, Sulaiman, Mohammed., Prof., Dr., Sadik, Mohammad, Ali, AL-Hussainy. (2022). Publicity in the Acts of the Legal Administration. A Comparative Study. Journal of Juridical and Political Science,  doi: 10.55716/jjps.2022.11.2.1.11
13. T., Huw, Edwards., Matthias, Luecke. (2011). Decompositions of Wage Inequality and Growth in an Advanced Economy open to Trade. Research Papers in Economics, 
14. Edward, D., Mansfield., Helen, V., Milner., B., Peter, Rosendorff. (2002). Replication, Realism, and Robustness: Analyzing Political Regimes and International Trade. American Political Science Review,  doi: 10.1017/S0003055402004306
15. Kotler, Philip. Marketing management. Pearson Prentice Hall. 2009
16. Ofcom (2015), Adults’ Media Use and Attitudes Report,http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/other/research-publications/adults/medialit-10years/ (accessed 09/15/15).
17. Thanyawich Vicheanpant( 2019) A Construct of Digital Learning Kingdom for Development 21st Century Skill Workforce: ACADEMIC JOURNAL BANGKOKTHONBURI UNIVERSITY Vol.8 No.2 July-December 2019 P.130-143.