Authors : Mohammed, Alsebaeai; Shehab Al-Qubati; Sarah Isskandar; Haifa Juman; Shaima Alhalhali; Mesk ALosheeb; Sumia AL Badani; Ala'a Al-duais; Shaimaa Aklaan

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 3 - March

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3v5jc67d

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/24hfz8np

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25mar207

Google Scholar

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 15 to 20 days to display the article.

Abstract : This study aimed to estimate the prevalence and identify nutritional and non-nutritional risk factors associated with pica during pregnancy in Sana’a, Yemen. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 195 pregnant women using a self-administered questionnaire, developed based on a literature review and study objectives. Data were analyzed using SPSS software, and statistical tests were performed to assess associations between pica disorder and various risk factors. The results indicated that 28.7% of pregnant women exhibited pica behavior, with the most commonly consumed substances being ice (12.8%), clay (4.6%), petroleum oil (1.5%), charcoal (0.5%), water of haka (1.5%), cigarettes (1.5%), and other non-food items (3.6%). Statistical analysis revealed a significant association (p<0.05) between pica disorder and household members, as well as anxiety, while no significant relationships were found with other demographic, nutritional, or pregnancy-related factors. The findings emphasize the need for further research to explore the underlying causes of pica consumption and its relationship with dietary intake through quantitative analysis.

Keywords : Woman, Pica, Questionnaire, Disease, Yemen.

References :

1. Young SL. Pica in pregnancy: new ideas about an old condition. Annual review of nutrition. 2010 Aug 21;30(1):403-22.
2. Fawcett EJ, Fawcett JM, Mazmanian D. A meta-analysis of the worldwide prevalence of pica during pregnancy and the postpartum period. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2016 Jun 1;133(3):277-83.
3. Ngozi PO. Pica practices of pregnant women in Nairobi, Kenya. East African medical journal. 2008 Jun 11;85(2):72-9.
4. Young SL, Sherman PW, Lucks JB, Pelto GH. Why on earth?: Evaluating hypotheses about the physiological functions of human geophagy. The Quarterly review of biology. 2011 Jun 1;86(2):97-120.
5. Miao D, Young SL, Golden CD. A meta‐analysis of pica and micronutrient status. American Journal of Human Biology. 2015 Jan;27(1):84-93.
6. Miller JD, Collins SM, Omotayo M, Martin SL, Dickin KL, Young SL. Geophagic earths consumed by women in w estern K enya contain dangerous levels of lead, arsenic, and iron. American Journal of Human Biology. 2018 Jul;30(4):e23130.
7. Nyanza EC, Joseph M, Premji SS, Thomas DS, Mannion C. Geophagy practices and the content of chemical elements in the soil eaten by pregnant women in artisanal and small scale gold mining communities in Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2014 Dec;14:1-0.
8. Miller JD, Fitzgerald KG, Smith AL, Young SL, (2019). Geophagy among a cohort of Kenyan women with mixed HIV status: a longitudinal analysis. Am J Trop Med Hyg 101: 654–660.
9. Miller JD, Fitzgerald KG, Smith AL, Young SL. Geophagy among a cohort of Kenyan women with mixed HIV status: A longitudinal analysis. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2019 Jul 22;101(3):654.
10. Williams LB, Haydel SE, Ferrell Jr RE. Bentonite, bandaids, and borborygmi. Elements. 2009 Apr 1;5(2):99-104.
11. Owumi SE, Oyelere AK. Determination of metal ion contents of two antiemetic clays use in Geophagy. Toxicology Reports. 2015 Jan 1;2:928-32.