Authors : Kavya C S; Preeti

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 9 - September

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/2hfyakcx

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/mtwjrc8s

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25sep270

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.

Abstract : This study explores the psychological effects of handwriting training on children and adolescents. Handwriting is closely linked with cognitive, emotional, and motor development, making it an essential component of learning. The research was conducted with 20 participants who underwent 16 hours of structured handwriting training. Before-and-after handwriting samples, along with parent and student feedback, were collected and analyzed. Results demonstrated improvements in letter formation, legibility, speed, and consistency. Psychological benefits such as increased focus, reduced stress, enhanced confidence, and better emotional regulation were also observed. These findings highlight handwriting as more than a motor skill, emphasizing its role in boosting self-esteem, cognitive growth, and learning readiness. Future research can expand this study with larger samples and digital handwriting tools.

Keywords : Handwriting, Psychology, Cognitive Development, Motor Skills, Student Learning

References :

1. Johnson, A., & Parker, L. (2018). Handwriting and Cognitive Development in Children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(3), 456-472.
2. Smith, R. (2015). The Psychological Interpretation of Handwriting. Graphology Today, 22(1), 34-45.
3. R. Smith, “The psychological interpretation of handwriting,” Graphology Today, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 34–45, 2015.
4. A. Johnson and L. Parker, “Handwriting and cognitive development in children,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 456–472, 2018.
5. K. H. James and L. Engelhardt, “The effects of handwriting experience on functional brain development in pre-literate children,” Trends in Neuroscience and Education, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 32–42, 2012.
6. T. J. Smoker, C. Murphy, and T. Rockwell, “Comparing memory for handwriting versus typing,” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 53, no. 22, pp. 1744–1747, 2009.
7. A. Mangen and J. L. Velay, “Handwriting and the brain: A cognitive neuroscience perspective,” Advances in Cognitive Psychology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 123–135, 2019.
8. K. P. Feder and A. Majnemer, “Handwriting development, competency, and intervention,” Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 312–317, 2007.
9. T. Santangelo and S. Graham, “A comprehensive meta-analysis of handwriting instruction,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 225–265, 2016.
10. V. W. Berninger and T. Richards, Brain Literacy for Educators and Psychologists. Academic Press, 2002.