Authors : Kasonga Kambaja Merveil

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 9 - September

---

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/yc89w9bt

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/3fs47j3e

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25sep357

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.

---

Abstract : The present study is a qualitative analysis of the translation of the magazine Calebasse by the Asky Company. It makes a significant contribution to the field of translation by offering an in-depth analysis of the analytical processes and challenges related to the translation of documents, it presents and comments the lexico-syntactical choices of the translator in order to evaluate their adequacy for the purpose assigned to the translator which is to faithfully transcribe the thought of its author. As results of this study, it demonstrates after analysis that certain choices of the translator are to be improved because they do not faithfully convey the intention of the author of the source text and do not always have the same meaning in the context respectively used.

Keywords : Quality Assessment; Translation; Translation Choices; Translator.

References :

1. Gile D. (Ed). (1995). Basic Concepts and Models for interpreter and translator training. University of Amsterdam Press.
2. Gottlieb, H. (1992). Subtitling – A New University Discipline. In: Dollerup, Cay and Ladegaard, Anne (red). Teaching Translation and Interpreting – Training, Talent and Experience. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
3. Gottlieb H. (1997): Subtitles, Translation & Idioms. Copenhagen: Centre for Translation Studies, University of Copenhagen.
4. Isabelle R. (2018). Translation Revision Procedures: An Explorative Study. Universiteit Antwerpen, Belgium.
5. Jorge Díaz Cintas. (2012), Subtitling from: The Routledge Handbook of Translation Studies Routledge.
6. Lavaur J.M & Serban A. (2008). La traduction audiovisuelle, Approche interdisciplinaire du sous-titrage, Paris.
7. Mossop B. (1982). A Procedure for Self-Revision. Terminology Update. Vol 15, n^o3, pp 6).
8. Munday J. (2001) Introducing Translation Studies, Theorie and applications. Basil Hatim, Heriot-Watt University.
9. Newmark P. 1988. A Textbook of Translation. London: Prentice Hall. Nida, E. A., & Taber, C. R. (1974). The Theory and Practice of translation.
10. Nord C. (1991). Text Analysis in Translation: theory, methodology, and didactic application of a model for translation-oriented text analysis. Amsterdam/Atlanta GA
11. Vinay J-P & Darbelnet J. (1958). Stylistique comparée du francais et de l’anglais: Methode de traduction, Paris.
12. Vinay J.P & Darbelnet J. (1958 :87-132). A Methodology for Translation. In L. Venuti (Ed.), the Translation Studies, London.
13. Saputra, Adi. 2004. An Analysis of Film Subtitle Strategies of Apt Pupil. Unpublished Paper. Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris. FPBS UPI, Bandung.