The Role of Intuition in Strategic Decision- Making: Exploring the Moderating Impact of Complex Work Environments in the Indian Hospitality Sector


Authors : Dr. Renu Sharma; Dr. Nisa Vinodkumar; Dr. Avita Khawas

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 5 - May


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3u6trwsz

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25may446

Google Scholar

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 15 to 20 days to display the article.


Abstract : This study explores the influence of inferential and affective intuition on decision-making quality within complex organizational settings, focusing on the Indian hospitality industry. Using a quantitative research approach, data were collected through a structured survey of experienced hospitality professionals and analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) via Smart PLS 4. Findings reveal that both types of intuition significantly enhance decision quality. Furthermore, complex work environments positively moderate the relationship between inferential intuition and decision quality, while no significant moderation is observed for affective intuition. These insights contribute to a deeper understanding of how intuition operates in dynamic business contexts and highlight the importance of intuitive skill development for strategic effectiveness.

Keywords : Intuition, Decision Quality, Complex Work Environment, Hospitality Sector, Structural Equation Modeling.

References :

  1. Agor, Weston H. 1984. “Using Intuition to Manage Organizations in the Future.” Business Horizons 27(4):49–54.
  2. Al-mehsin, Salama Aqeel. 2017. “Self-Efficacy and Its Relationship with Social Skills and the Quality of Decision-Making among the Students of Prince Sattam Bin Abdul-Aziz University.” International Education Studies 10(7):108. doi: 10.5539/ies.v10n7p108.
  3. Anon. n.d. “Easen1996.Pdf.”
  4. Baron, Reuben M., and David A. Kenny. 1986. “The Moderator–Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(6):1173.
  5. Bechara, Antoine, Hanna Damasio, Daniel Tranel, and Antonio R. Damasio. 1997. “Deciding Advantageously before Knowing the Advantageous Strategy.” Science 275(5304):1293–95.
  6. Behling, Orlando, and Norman L. Eckel. 1991. “Making Sense out of Intuition.” Academy of Management Perspectives 5(1):46–54.
  7. Burke, Lisa A., and Monica K. Miller. 1999. “Taking the Mystery out of Intuitive Decision Making.” Academy of Management Perspectives 13(4):91–99.
  8. Carlson, Lauren A. n.d. “Validation of a Measure of Affective, Inferential and Holistic Intuition.” 52.
  9. Chewning Jr, Eugene G., and Adrian M. Harrell. 1990. “The Effect of Information Load on Decision Makers’ Cue Utilization Levels and Decision Quality in a Financial Distress Decision Task.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 15(6):527–42.
  10. Chin, Wynne W. 1998. “The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling.” Modern Methods for Business Research 295(2):295–336.
  11. Dane, Erik, and Michael G. Pratt. 2007. “Exploring Intuition and Its Role in Managerial Decision Making.” Academy of Management Review 32(1):33–54.
  12. Dayan, Mumin, and Said Elbanna. 2011. “Antecedents of Team Intuition and Its Impact on the Success of New Product Development Projects.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 28(s1):159–74.
  13. Dean Jr, James W., and Mark P. Sharfman. 1996. “Does Decision Process Matter? A Study of Strategic Decision-Making Effectiveness.” Academy of Management Journal 39(2):368–92.
  14. Denes-Raj, Veronika, and Seymour Epstein. 1994. “Conflict between Intuitive and Rational Processing: When People Behave against Their Better Judgment.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66(5):819.
  15. Dijksterhuis, Ap, Maarten W. Bos, Loran F. Nordgren, and Rick B. Van Baaren. 2006. “On Making the Right Choice: The Deliberation-without-Attention Effect.” Science 311(5763):1005–7.
  16. Eberl, Peter, Daniel Geiger, and Michael S. Aßländer. 2015. “Repairing Trust in an Organization after Integrity Violations: The Ambivalence of Organizational Rule Adjustments.” Organization Studies 36(9):1205–35.
  17. Eisenberger, Robert, and Michael Adornetto. 1986. “Generalized Self-Control of Delay and Effort.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(5):1020.
  18. Forbes, Daniel P. 2007. “Reconsidering the Strategic Implications of Decision Comprehensiveness.” Academy of Management Review 32(2):361–76.
  19. Fornell, Claes, and David F. Larcker. 1981. “Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics.”
  20. Frantz, Roger. 2000. “Intuitive Elements in Adam Smith.” The Journal of Socio-Economics 29(1):1–19.
  21. Fredrickson, James W., and Anthony L. Iaquinto. 1989. “Inertia and Creeping Rationality in Strategic Decision Processes.” Academy of Management Journal 32(3):516–42.
  22. Gaudine, Alice, and Linda Thorne. 2001. “Emotion and Ethical Decision-Making in Organizations.” Journal of Business Ethics 31(2):175–87.
  23. Goodman, Noah D., Chris L. Baker, Elizabeth Baraff Bonawitz, Vikash K. Mansinghka, Alison Gopnik, Henry Wellman, Laura Schulz, and Joshua B. Tenenbaum. 2006. “Intuitive Theories of Mind: A Rational Approach to False Belief.” in Vol. 6. Cognitive Science Society Vancouver.
  24. Guenther, Herbert V. 1958. “The Levels of Understanding in Buddhism.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 78(1):19–28.
  25. Hair, Joe, Carole L. Hollingsworth, Adriane B. Randolph, and Alain Yee Loong Chong. 2017. “An Updated and Expanded Assessment of PLS-SEM in Information Systems Research.” Industrial Management & Data Systems.
  26. Hair, Joseph F., Christian M. Ringle, and Marko Sarstedt. 2012. “Partial Least Squares: The Better Approach to Structural Equation Modeling?” Long Range Planning 45(5–6):312–19.
  27. Hair, Joseph F., Jeffrey J. Risher, Marko Sarstedt, and Christian M. Ringle. 2019. “When to Use and How to Report the Results of PLS-SEM.” European Business Review 31(1):2–24.
  28. Hensman, Ann, and Eugene Sadler-Smith. 2011. “Intuitive Decision Making in Banking and Finance.” European Management Journal 29(1):51–66.
  29. Hogarth, Robin M. 2001. Educating Intuition. University of Chicago Press.
  30. Huang, Tori Yu-wen. n.d. “INTUITION AND EMOTION: EXAMINING TWO NON-RATIONAL APPROACHES IN COMPLEX DECISION MAKING.” 144.
  31. Hutton, Robert JB, and Gary Klein. 1999. “Expert Decision Making.” Systems Engineering: The Journal of The International Council on Systems Engineering 2(1):32–45.
  32. Isenberg, Daniel J. 1983. How Senior Managers Think (and What About): Some Preliminary Findings and Their Implications. Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard ….
  33. Jacoby, Jacob. 1977. “Information Load and Decision Quality: Some Contested Issues.” Journal of Marketing Research 14(4):569–73.
  34. Khatri, Naresh, and H. Alvin Ng. 2000. “The Role of Intuition in Strategic Decision Making.” Human Relations 53(1):57–86.
  35. Kriger, Mark P., and Louis B. Barnes. 1992. “Organizational Decision‐making as Hierarchical Levels of Drama.” Journal of Management Studies 29(4):439–57.
  36. Langley, Ann, Henry Mintzberg, Patricia Pitcher, Elizabeth Posada, and Jan Saint-Macary. 1995. “Opening up Decision Making: The View from the Black Stool.” Organization Science 6(3):260–79.
  37. Lieberman, Matthew D. 2000. “Intuition: A Social Cognitive Neuroscience Approach.” Psychological Bulletin 126(1):109.
  1. Lipshitz, Raanan, Gary Klein, Judith Orasanu, and Eduardo Salas. 2001. “Taking Stock of Naturalistic Decision Making.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 14(5):331–52.
  2. Lohmöller, Jan-Bernd. 1989. “Predictive vs. Structural Modeling: Pls vs. Ml.” Pp. 199–226 in Latent variable path modeling with partial least squares. Springer.
  3. McKinley, William, and Andreas Georg Scherer. 2000. “Some Unanticipated Consequences of Organizational Restructuring.” Academy of Management Review 25(4):735–52.
  4. Miller, C. Chet, and R. Duane Ireland. 2005. “Intuition in Strategic Decision Making: Friend or Foe in the Fast-Paced 21 st Century?” Academy of Management Perspectives 19(1):19–30. doi: 10.5465/ame.2005.15841948.
  5. Nunnally, Jum C. 1978. “An Overview of Psychological Measurement.” Clinical Diagnosis of Mental Disorders 97–146.
  6. Nutt, Paul C. 1998. “Evaluating Alternatives to Make Strategic Choices.” Omega 26(3):333–54.
  7. Osbeck, Lisa M. 2001. “Direct Apprehension and Social Construction: Revisiting the Concept of Intuition.” Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 21(2):118.
  8. Papadakis, Vassilis M., Spyros Lioukas, and David Chambers. 1998. “Strategic Decision‐making Processes: The Role of Management and Context.” Strategic Management Journal 19(2):115–47.
  9. Parikh, Jagdish, Alden Lank, and Friedrich Neubauer. 1994. Intuition: The New Frontier of Management. John Wiley & Sons.
  10. Podsakoff, Philip M., Scott B. MacKenzie, Jeong-Yeon Lee, and Nathan P. Podsakoff. 2003. “Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies.” Journal of Applied Psychology 88(5):879.
  11. Podsakoff, Philip M., Scott B. MacKenzie, Nathan P. Podsakoff, and Daniel G. Bachrach. 2008. “Scholarly Influence in the Field of Management: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Determinants of University and Author Impact in the Management Literature in the Past Quarter Century.” Journal of Management 34(4):641–720.
  12. Pretz, Jean E., and Kathryn Sentman Totz. 2007. “Measuring Individual Differences in Affective, Heuristic, and Holistic Intuition.” Personality and Individual Differences 43(5):1247–57.
  13. Reinartz, Werner, Michael Haenlein, and Jörg Henseler. 2009. “An Empirical Comparison of the Efficacy of Covariance-Based and Variance-Based SEM.” International Journal of Research in Marketing 26(4):332–44.
  14. Reynolds, Scott J. 2006. “A Neurocognitive Model of the Ethical Decision-Making Process: Implications for Study and Practice.” Journal of Applied Psychology 91(4):737.
  1. Richter, Nicole Franziska, Gabriel Cepeda-Carrion, José Luis Roldán Salgueiro, and Christian M. Ringle. 2016. “European Management Research Using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM).” European Management Journal, 34 (6), 589-597.
  2. Ritchie, William J., Robert W. Kolodinsky, and Karen Eastwood. 2007. “Does Executive Intuition Matter? An Empirical Analysis of Its Relationship with Nonprofit Organization Financial Performance.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 36(1):140–55.
  3. Sadler-Smith, Eugene. 2004. “Cognitive Style and the Management of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises.” Organization Studies 25(2):155–81.
  4. Simon, Herbert A. 1987. “Making Management Decisions: The Role of Intuition and Emotion.” Academy of Management Perspectives 1(1):57–64. doi: 10.5465/ame.1987.4275905.
  5. Tinghög, Gustav, David Andersson, Caroline Bonn, Magnus Johannesson, Michael Kirchler, Lina Koppel, and Daniel Västfjäll. 2016. “Intuition and Moral Decision-Making – The Effect of Time Pressure and Cognitive Load on Moral Judgment and Altruistic Behavior” edited by M. Espinosa. PLOS ONE 11(10):e0164012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164012.
  6. Vaughan, Frances E. 1979. Awakening Intuition. Anchor.
  7. Wild, Monica R. 1938. “The Behavior Pattern of Throwing and Some Observations Concerning Its Course of Development in Children.” Research Quarterly. American Association for Health and Physical Education 9(3):20–24.

This study explores the influence of inferential and affective intuition on decision-making quality within complex organizational settings, focusing on the Indian hospitality industry. Using a quantitative research approach, data were collected through a structured survey of experienced hospitality professionals and analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) via Smart PLS 4. Findings reveal that both types of intuition significantly enhance decision quality. Furthermore, complex work environments positively moderate the relationship between inferential intuition and decision quality, while no significant moderation is observed for affective intuition. These insights contribute to a deeper understanding of how intuition operates in dynamic business contexts and highlight the importance of intuitive skill development for strategic effectiveness.

Keywords : Intuition, Decision Quality, Complex Work Environment, Hospitality Sector, Structural Equation Modeling.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe