Authors :
Amina S. Omar; Kennedy O. Ondimu
Volume/Issue :
Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 1 - January
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/6awjzfnc
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/33mm2stv
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14944928
Abstract :
This paper examines the role of paradigm shifts in scientific innovation through Thomas Kuhn’s theory of
scientific revolutions. Kuhn’s model challenges linear progress, arguing that anomalies in prevailing paradigms trigger
transformative shifts. Historical examples, such as the Copernican Revolution and Darwinian Evolution, illustrate how
these shifts redefine scientific understanding. Modern cases, including artificial intelligence, CRISPR technology, and
climate modeling, affirm Kuhn’s relevance while revealing limitations in addressing incremental and interdisciplinary
advancements. The study explores paradigm shifts’ dual role as disruptors of knowledge and creators of new frameworks,
emphasizing their societal and ethical implications. Kuhn’s binary distinction between normal and revolutionary science is
critiqued for oversimplifying modern complexities. By integrating historical and contemporary insights, this paper
highlights how paradigm shifts shape scientific and societal progress. It calls for refining Kuhn’s framework to align with
today’s dynamic, collaborative, and technology-driven advancements, ensuring its relevance in analyzing innovation.
Keywords :
Paradigm Shifts, Scientific Innovation, Thomas Kuhn, Scientific Revolutions, Interdisciplinary Advancements, Modern Science.
References :
- Bird, A. (2018). Kuhn and the philosophy of science. Cambridge University Press.
- Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J.,
- Carnap, R. (1928). The logical structure of the world. University of California Press.
- Dhariwal, P., ... & Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 1877-1901.
- Doudna, J. A., & Sternberg, S. H. (2017). A Crack in Creation: Gene Editing and the Unthinkable Power to Control Evolution. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
- Edwards, P. N. (2010). A Vast Machine: Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming. MIT Press.
- Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against method. Verso Books.
- Hacking, I. (2012). The philosophy of Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
- Holmes, F. L. (1985). Lavoisier and the Chemistry of Life: An Exploration of Scientific Creativity. University of Wisconsin Press.
- Judson, H. F. (1996). The Eighth Day of Creation: Makers of the Revolution in Biology. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
- Jinek, M., et al. (2012). A programmable dual-RNA–guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science, 337(6096), 816-821. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1225829
- Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
- Lakatos, I. (1970). The methodology of scientific research programs. Cambridge University Press.
- LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436-444. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539
- Miao, L., et al. (2023). Artificial intelligence in medical diagnostics: A transformative paradigm shift. Journal of Medical Systems, 47(5), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-023-00759-9
- Parker, W. S. (2010). Predicting weather and climate: Uncertainty, ensembles, and probability. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 41(3), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2010.07.006
- Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2016). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (3rd ed.). Pearson.
- Reichstein, M., Camps-Valls, G., Stevens, B., Jung, M., Denzler, J., Carvalhais, N., & Prabhat. (2019). Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science. Nature, 566(7743), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0912-1
- Schlick, M. (1918). General theory of knowledge. Springer.
- Watson, J. D., & Crick, F. H. C. (1953). Molecular structure of nucleic acids: A structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature, 171(4356), 737–738. https://doi.org/10.1038/171737a0
- Journal: https://www.ijisrt.com/
This paper examines the role of paradigm shifts in scientific innovation through Thomas Kuhn’s theory of
scientific revolutions. Kuhn’s model challenges linear progress, arguing that anomalies in prevailing paradigms trigger
transformative shifts. Historical examples, such as the Copernican Revolution and Darwinian Evolution, illustrate how
these shifts redefine scientific understanding. Modern cases, including artificial intelligence, CRISPR technology, and
climate modeling, affirm Kuhn’s relevance while revealing limitations in addressing incremental and interdisciplinary
advancements. The study explores paradigm shifts’ dual role as disruptors of knowledge and creators of new frameworks,
emphasizing their societal and ethical implications. Kuhn’s binary distinction between normal and revolutionary science is
critiqued for oversimplifying modern complexities. By integrating historical and contemporary insights, this paper
highlights how paradigm shifts shape scientific and societal progress. It calls for refining Kuhn’s framework to align with
today’s dynamic, collaborative, and technology-driven advancements, ensuring its relevance in analyzing innovation.
Keywords :
Paradigm Shifts, Scientific Innovation, Thomas Kuhn, Scientific Revolutions, Interdisciplinary Advancements, Modern Science.