The Role of Paradigm Shifts in Scientific Innovation: Analysis of Kuhn’s Concept of Scientific Revolutions with Modern Case Studies


Authors : Amina S. Omar; Kennedy O. Ondimu

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 1 - January


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/6awjzfnc

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/33mm2stv

DOI : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14944928


Abstract : This paper examines the role of paradigm shifts in scientific innovation through Thomas Kuhn’s theory of scientific revolutions. Kuhn’s model challenges linear progress, arguing that anomalies in prevailing paradigms trigger transformative shifts. Historical examples, such as the Copernican Revolution and Darwinian Evolution, illustrate how these shifts redefine scientific understanding. Modern cases, including artificial intelligence, CRISPR technology, and climate modeling, affirm Kuhn’s relevance while revealing limitations in addressing incremental and interdisciplinary advancements. The study explores paradigm shifts’ dual role as disruptors of knowledge and creators of new frameworks, emphasizing their societal and ethical implications. Kuhn’s binary distinction between normal and revolutionary science is critiqued for oversimplifying modern complexities. By integrating historical and contemporary insights, this paper highlights how paradigm shifts shape scientific and societal progress. It calls for refining Kuhn’s framework to align with today’s dynamic, collaborative, and technology-driven advancements, ensuring its relevance in analyzing innovation.

Keywords : Paradigm Shifts, Scientific Innovation, Thomas Kuhn, Scientific Revolutions, Interdisciplinary Advancements, Modern Science.

References :

  1. Bird, A. (2018). Kuhn and the philosophy of science. Cambridge University Press.
  2. Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J.,
  3. Carnap, R. (1928). The logical structure of the world. University of California Press.
  4. Dhariwal, P., ... & Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 1877-1901.
  5. Doudna, J. A., & Sternberg, S. H. (2017). A Crack in Creation: Gene Editing and the Unthinkable Power to Control Evolution. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
  6. Edwards, P. N. (2010). A Vast Machine: Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming. MIT Press.
  7. Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against method. Verso Books.
  8. Hacking, I. (2012). The philosophy of Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
  9. Holmes, F. L. (1985). Lavoisier and the Chemistry of Life: An Exploration of Scientific Creativity. University of Wisconsin Press.
  10. Judson, H. F. (1996). The Eighth Day of Creation: Makers of the Revolution in Biology. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
  11. Jinek, M., et al. (2012). A programmable dual-RNA–guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science, 337(6096), 816-821. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1225829
  12. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
  13. Lakatos, I. (1970). The methodology of scientific research programs. Cambridge University Press.
  14. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436-444. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539
  15. Miao, L., et al. (2023). Artificial intelligence in medical diagnostics: A transformative paradigm shift. Journal of Medical Systems, 47(5), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-023-00759-9
  16. Parker, W. S. (2010). Predicting weather and climate: Uncertainty, ensembles, and probability. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 41(3), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2010.07.006
  17. Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2016). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (3rd ed.). Pearson.
  18. Reichstein, M., Camps-Valls, G., Stevens, B., Jung, M., Denzler, J., Carvalhais, N., & Prabhat. (2019). Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science. Nature, 566(7743), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0912-1
  19. Schlick, M. (1918). General theory of knowledge. Springer.
  20. Watson, J. D., & Crick, F. H. C. (1953). Molecular structure of nucleic acids: A structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature, 171(4356), 737–738. https://doi.org/10.1038/171737a0
  21. Journal: https://www.ijisrt.com/

This paper examines the role of paradigm shifts in scientific innovation through Thomas Kuhn’s theory of scientific revolutions. Kuhn’s model challenges linear progress, arguing that anomalies in prevailing paradigms trigger transformative shifts. Historical examples, such as the Copernican Revolution and Darwinian Evolution, illustrate how these shifts redefine scientific understanding. Modern cases, including artificial intelligence, CRISPR technology, and climate modeling, affirm Kuhn’s relevance while revealing limitations in addressing incremental and interdisciplinary advancements. The study explores paradigm shifts’ dual role as disruptors of knowledge and creators of new frameworks, emphasizing their societal and ethical implications. Kuhn’s binary distinction between normal and revolutionary science is critiqued for oversimplifying modern complexities. By integrating historical and contemporary insights, this paper highlights how paradigm shifts shape scientific and societal progress. It calls for refining Kuhn’s framework to align with today’s dynamic, collaborative, and technology-driven advancements, ensuring its relevance in analyzing innovation.

Keywords : Paradigm Shifts, Scientific Innovation, Thomas Kuhn, Scientific Revolutions, Interdisciplinary Advancements, Modern Science.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe