The Role of Stakeholders in Addressing Cultural Commodification in Puri Saren Agung Ubud Gianyar District


Authors : Tri Purna Gumelar; Yohanes Kristianto; Widiastuti

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 6 - June


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/2sem6ka6

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/msmck4n4

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUN1197

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : The impact of cultural commodification tends to refer to negative patronage issues and little attention is paid to discussions of social adjustment. Puri Saren Agung Ubud as a cultural heritage landmark which then commodifies its culture. This research examines the role of stakeholders in responding to cultural commodification. Based on qualitative research with hermeneutic phenomenological analysis, the results show that this cultural commodification is responded to in a form by stakeholders, in this case ARCGM (Academy, royals, community, government, media). The roles of ARCGM stakeholders are: 1) academy as drafter; 2) royals as policy creators and facilitators; 3) community as implementer; 4) government as coordinator; 5) media as an accelerator and mediator. This study proposes that stakeholders build tourism mobility with innovative local values to strengthen socio-cultural identity. This study makes it possible to provide a better understanding of socio-cultural consequences as a basic framework in formulating policies, regulations and collectivities.

Keywords : Cultural Commodification, Impact, Puri Saren Agung Ubud, Role of Pentahelix Stakeholders, Phenomenology.

References :

  1. Ahmad, Tanzeh. 2017. Metodologi Penelitian Praktis. Yogyakarta: Teras. Al Amin, Robby Ul Pratama. 2021. Sinergi Pentahelix dalam Meningkatkan Inovasi Startup Digital di Kota Cimahi. Universitas Komputer Indonesia.
  2. Amirin, M. Tatang, 2000. Menyusun Rencana Penelitian, PT. Rajarafindo Persada, Jakarta.
  3. Anonim,    2020.      Program We          Love       Bali, Pancarkan   Kemegahan          Puri         Ubud. https:// mediaindonesia.com/nusantara/366796/program-we-love-balipancarkan- kemegahan-puri-ubud (dilansir 29 September 2023)
  4. Berliandaldo, Mahardhika., Achmad Chodiq., & Driszal Fryantoni. 2021. Kolaborasi dan Sinergitas Antar Stakeholder dalam Pembangunan Berkelanjutan Sektor Pariwisata Di Kebun Raya Cibinong. INOBIS: Jurnal Inovasi Bisnis dan Manajemen Indonesia Volume 04, Nomor 02, Maret 2021
  5. Bryson, John. M. 2004. What To Do When Stakeholders Matter: A Guide to Stakeholder Identification and Analysis Techniques. Public Management Review.
  6. Cahyana, Shafa Raya., & Saptono Nugroho. 2019. Analisis Peran Stakeholder Desa Wisata Carangsari, Kecamatan Petang, Kabupaten Badung. Jurnal Destinasi Pariwisata: Vol (7) No (2), 2019.
  7. Charag, Asif Hamid., Asif Iqbal Fazili., & Irfan Bashir. 2020. Residents’ Perception Towards Tourism Impact in Tourism. International Journal of Tourism Cites. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJTC-11-2019-0202
  8. Ching, Francis D.K. 1979. ARCHITECTURE: Form, Space And Order Atau Arsitektur: Bentuk, Ruang Dan Susunannya. Terjemahan Paulus Hanoto Ajie, Jakarta: Erlangga
  9. Choi, S. H. 2010. The Impact of Tourism and Local Residents’ Support On Tourism Development: A Case Study Of The Rural Community Of Jeongseon, Gangwon Province, South Korea. Assumption Journal.
  10. Chris Halewood., & Kevin Hannam. 2001. Viking heritage tourism: Authenticity and Commodification. Annals of Tourism Research. Volume 28, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 565-580. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(00)00076-1
  11. Creswell, J.W. 1998. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Tradition. London: Sage Publications.
  12. Creswell, J.W. 2012. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Pearson, 2012
  13. Destiana, Riska., Kismartini., & Tri Yuningsih. Analisis Peran Stakeholders Dalam Pengembangan Destinasi Pariwisata Halal Di Pulau Penyengat Provinsi Kepulauan Riau. JURNAL ILMU ADMINISTRSI NEGARA (AsIAN) VOL. 08 NO. 02 (September 2020)
  14. Enemuo, O. B., & Amaechi, B. 2015. The Role of Mass Media in Tourism Development in Abia State. Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Sports, 11(2013), 44–50. Retrieved from http://www.iiste.org/Journals/i ndex.php/JTHS/article/view/24 693/25295
  15. Fitri Handayani, Hardi Warsono. 2018. Analisis Peran Stakeholders Dalam Pengembangan Objek Wisata Pantai Karang Jahe Di Kabupaten Rembang Oleh: Departemen Ilmu Administrasi Publik. Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik. Universitas Diponegoro
  16. Fyall, Alan; Garrod, Brian; & Leask, Anna. 2003. Managing Visitors Attractions New Direction. Great Britain: Oxford, Rochester.
  17. Grimble, Robin., & Kate Wellard. 1997. Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: a review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities. Agricultural Systems: Vol (55) Issue (2), 1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308- 521X(97) 00006-1
  18. Kanungo, R. N. & Mendonca, M. 1996. Ethical Dimensions of Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
  19. Kuswarno, Engkus. 2009. fenomenologi: Konsepsi, Pedoman, dan Contoh Penelitian.Widya Padjajaran.
  20. Longart, P., Wickens, E., Ocaña, W., & Llugsha, V. 2017. A stakeholder analysis of a service learning project for tourism development in An Ecuadorian Rural Community. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 20(April), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste
  21. Maleong, LJ. 2007. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakaya. Maturbongs, Edoardus E., & Lekatompessy, Ransta L. 2020. Pentahelix Collaboration in Tourism Development Based on Local Wisdom in Merauke Regency. Source , 81 , 59.
  22. Muhyi, H. A., Chan, A., Sukoco, I., & Herawaty, T. 2017. The Penta Helix collaboration model in developing centers of flagship industry in Bandung city. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 6(1), 412-417.
  23. Nurhadi, Iwan., Titik Sumarti., Arya Hadi Darmawan., & Didin S Damanhuri. 2022. The Commodification O Culture and Ethical Transition of Tourism Development: An Insight from Osing Community, Indonesia. Solidary: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan Vol. 10 (01) 2022, 24-43. https://doi.org/10.22500/10202238564
  24. Pratheep, P. S. 2017. The Impact of Tourism on Indian Culture. The 3th International Conference on Language. Society And Culture in Asian Context (2016). Vol 2017, 1(3), 429. https://doi.org/10.18502/ kss.vli3.765
  25. Rahu, Bernard. 2021. Teori Sosiologi Modern. Maumere: Ledalero.
  26. Rahu, P. D., & Suprayitno, S. 2021. Kolaborasi Model Pentahelix dalam Pengembangan Desa Wisata Sei Gohong Kecamatan Bukit Batu Kota Palangka Raya. Journal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Pemerintahan, 10(1), 13-24.
  27. Setianingsih, Endang Larasati., Augustin Rina Herawati., & Dyah Hariani. 2022. Penta Helix Model Tourism Development in The City of Palembang. Journal of Research and Community Service: Vol (3) No (13), November 2022. http://devotion.greenvest. co.id/
  28. Shafa Raya Cahyana., & Saptono Nugroho. 2019. Analisis Peran Stakeholder Desa Wisata Carangsari, Kecamatan Petang, Kabupaten Badung. Jurnal Destinasi Pariwisata, Volume (7) No (2), 2019.
  29. Sugiyono. 2017. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta,cv Suharno., & Ana Retnoningsih. 2014. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Semarang: Widya Karya
  30. Suharto, Bambang., Janianton Damanik., M. Baiquni., & Chafid Fandeli. 2014. Mobilitas Kelas Baru Di Dunia Industri Pariwisata. Jurnal Kawistara 4, no. 3 (2014): 287– 297 Suwantoro, Gamal. 2004. Dasar-dasar Pariwisata. Andi: Yogyakarta
  31. Suyanto, Bagong. & Sutinah. 2022. Metode penelitian sosial berbagai alternatif pendekatan: edisi ketiga. Jakarta : Kencana
  32. Undang-Undang No. 10 Tahun 2009. Tentang Kepariwisataan.
  33. Utama, I Gusti Rai. 2016. Pengantar Industri Pariwisata. Sleman: Deepublish, 2016. Warsono, Fitri., & Hardi Warsono. 2017. Analisis Peran Stakeholders Dalam Pengembangan Objek Wisata Pantai Karang Jahe Di Kabupaten Rembang. Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu PolitikUniversitas Diponegoro.

The impact of cultural commodification tends to refer to negative patronage issues and little attention is paid to discussions of social adjustment. Puri Saren Agung Ubud as a cultural heritage landmark which then commodifies its culture. This research examines the role of stakeholders in responding to cultural commodification. Based on qualitative research with hermeneutic phenomenological analysis, the results show that this cultural commodification is responded to in a form by stakeholders, in this case ARCGM (Academy, royals, community, government, media). The roles of ARCGM stakeholders are: 1) academy as drafter; 2) royals as policy creators and facilitators; 3) community as implementer; 4) government as coordinator; 5) media as an accelerator and mediator. This study proposes that stakeholders build tourism mobility with innovative local values to strengthen socio-cultural identity. This study makes it possible to provide a better understanding of socio-cultural consequences as a basic framework in formulating policies, regulations and collectivities.

Keywords : Cultural Commodification, Impact, Puri Saren Agung Ubud, Role of Pentahelix Stakeholders, Phenomenology.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe