Authors : SMM Lakmali

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 5 - May

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/ytjk7vx5

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/56mjd24b

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24MAY1629

Abstract : Underscoring the interwoven methodologies and shared objectives of Machine Learning (ML) and Statistics, this paper aims to explore the synergy between the two disciplines with the proliferation of large datasets and advanced computational power. The ability of observing accurate insights for complex datasets and addressing real world applications with sophisticated, hybrid approaches can enhance with the convergence of the ML and Statistics. Although the concepts of both disciplines started with distinct origins, two disciplines increasingly intersect, fostering methodological cross fertilization. To improve the generalization and interpretability of ML concepts, statistical techniques such as model selection and regularization can be used while ensemble methods and neural networks exemplify predictive modeling’s statistical applications. By integrating ML to address the challenges in statistics such as fairness, interpretability, robustness, and scalability, statistician can enhance the key feature of statistics more effectively. Overall, combined concepts of ML and statistics not only address the diverse analytical task but it pave the path for Artificial Intelligence and data science by highlighting the main role of their synergy in modern data exploration.

Keywords : Machine Learning, Statistics, Algorithms, Decision Making.

References :

1. A. L. Samuel, "Some studies in machine learning using the game of checkers," IBM Journal of Research and Development, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 210-229, July 1959.
2. Christopher M. Bishop, Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, Springer, 2006.
3. David Barber, Bayesian Reasoning and Machine Learning, Cambridge University Press, 2012.
4. Stephen Boyd and Lieven Vandenberghe, Convex Optimization, Cambridge University Press, 2004.
5. C. E. Shannon, "A Mathematical Theory of Communication," The Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 27, pp. 379-423, 623-656, July, October 1948.
6. V. Vapnik, The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer, 1998.
7. A. C. Cameron and P. K. Trivedi, Regression Analysis of Count Data. Cambridge University Press, 2013.
8. T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman, The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. Springer, 2009.
9. C. Ramirez, C. Schau, and E. Emmioğlu, "Importance of attitudes in statistics education," Statistics Education Research Journal, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 57-71
10.  G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells, "Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics," The European Physical Journal C, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 1-19, 2011.
11.  L. V. Hedges and I. Olkin, "Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis," Academic Press, 1985.
12. G. James, D. Witten, T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani, "An Introduction to Statistical Learning: with Applications in R," Springer, 2013.
13. A. Gelman, J. B. Carlin, H. S. Stern, D. B. Dunson, A. Vehtari, and D. B. Rubin, "Bayesian Data Analysis," CRC Press, 2013.
14. L. Wasserman, "All of Statistics," Springer, 2004.
15. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio, and A. Courville, "Deep Learning," MIT Press, 2016.
16. L. Breiman, "Bagging predictors," Machine Learning, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 123-140, 1996.
17. J. Pearl, M. Glymour, and N. P. Jewell, "Causal Inference in Statistics: A Primer," Wiley, 2016.
18. R. Tibshirani, "Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 267-288, 1996.
19. Z. C. Lipton, "The mythos of model interpretability," arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.03490, 2016.
20. Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton, "Deep learning," Nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 436-444, 2015.
21. L. Breiman, "Statistical modeling: The two cultures," Statistical Science, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 199-231, 2001.