The Use of Groundnuts Oil as Substrate for Glycoprotein Biosurfactant Production by Micrococcs sp. LB11


Authors : Abdulsalam Mala Yakubu; Adamu Tential Salihu; Umar Jiddum Jidda; Khadija Mustapha Hussaini; Muhammad Lawan Wasaram; Alhaji Bukar Baba Shehu

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 12 - December


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3sd3rw2x

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/4vmzw5wk

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25dec448

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.


Abstract : Biosurfactants, which are surface-active molecules of microbial origin, are garnering significant attention as sustainable substitutes for synthetic surfactants. Their appeal lies in their inherent biocompatibility, environmental degradability, and stable performance across a range of physicochemical conditions. A primary impediment to their industrial adoption, however, is the substantial expense associated with fermentation feedstocks. The present investigation evaluates the efficacy of groundnut oil, a low-cost agricultural by-product, as an exclusive carbon substrate for the cost- effective microbial synthesis of biosurfactants. A consortium of a bacterial strains, isolated from hydrocarbon- contaminated soil, underwent primary screening for biosurfactant production. This screening employed a tripartite methodological approach: the oil-spreading technique, the drop-collapse assay, and the determination of the emulsification index (E24). Among the evaluated isolates, Micrococcus sp. strain LB11 demonstrated superior surface-activity traits, manifesting a 15 mm zone of oil\displacement and a rapid reduction in interfacial tension evidenced by a 45-second drop- collapse duration. While Alcaligenes faecalis (IS-7) displayed a considerable capacity for emulsion stabilization, Micrococcus sp. LB11 emerged as the most proficient candidate when propagated in a medium formulated with groundnut oil. Cultivation of Micrococcus sp. LB11 on this lipid substrate facilitated the generation of a biosurfactant achieving an E24 value of approximately 65% over a 24-hour incubation period. This quantitative measure of emulsion stability indicates the synthesis of a high-quality, robust biosurfactant. The magnitude of the emulsifying activity further suggests the production of a high-molecular-weight compound, potentially possessing a glycoproteinaceous character. These outcomes collectively validate groundnut oil as a proficient and economical substrate for augmenting biosurfactant yield. In summary, these findings position Micrococcus sp. LB11 as a highly promising isolate warranting in-depth biochemical analysis and scale-up exploration. The resultant biosurfactant holds considerable promise for deployment in environmentally pertinent applications, including but not limited to soil and water bioremediation, microbial-enhanced hydrocarbon recovery, and various green technological processes.

Keywords : Micrococcus sp. LB11, Groundnut Oil, Glycoprotein Biosurfactant, Biosurfactant Production, Sustainable Substrate, Emulsification Index (E24), Stable Emulsion Formation, Low-Cost Fermentation, Agro-Industrial Waste Valorization, Microbial Surface-Active Agents.

References :

  1. Abas, F. W., & Ibrahim, N. (2018). Biosurfactant production from treated palm oil mill effluent (POME) by Bacillus subtilis ATCC 21332. MATEC Web of Conferences, 150, 05004. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815005004
  2. Abdel-Mawgoud, A. M., Lépine, F., & Déziel, E. (2010). Rhamnolipids: Diversity of structures, microbial origins and roles. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 86(5), 1323–1336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-010-2498-2
  3. Banat, I. M., Franzetti, A., Gandolfi, I., Bestetti, G., Martinotti, M. G., Fracchia, L., Smyth, T. J., & Marchant, R. (2010). Microbial biosurfactants production, applications and future potential. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 87(2), 427–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-010-2589-0
  4. Bodour, A. A., & Miller-Maier, R. M. (1998). Application of a modified drop-collapse technique for surfactant quantitation and screening of biosurfactant-producing microorganisms. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 32(3), 273–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7012(98)00031-1
  5. Cameotra, S. S., & Makkar, R. S. (2004). Recent applications of biosurfactants as biological and immunological molecules. Current Opinion in Microbiology, 7(3), 262–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2004.04.006
  6. Cappuccino, J. G., & Sherman, N. (2014). Microbiology: A laboratory manual (10th ed.). Pearson Education.
  7. Cheesbrough, M. (2006). District laboratory practice in tropical countries, Part 2 (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511543470
  8. Cooper, D. G., & Goldenberg, B. G. (1987). Surface-active agents from two Bacillus species. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 53(2), 224–229. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.53.2.224-229.1987
  9. da Rosa, C. F. C., Freire, D. M. G., & Ferraz, H. C. (2015). Biosurfactant microfoam: Application in the removal of pollutants from soil. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 3(1), 89–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2014.11.008
  10. Desai, J. D., & Banat, I. M. (1997). Microbial production of surfactants and their commercial potential. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 61(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.61.1.47-64.1997
  11. Fagan, M. (2015). Antibiotic resistance patterns of bacteria causing urinary tract infections in the elderly living in nursing homes versus the elderly living at home: An observational study. BMC Geriatrics, 15(1), 98. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0098-9
  12. Franzetti, A., Gandolfi, I., Bestetti, G., Smyth, T. J., & Banat, I. M. (2010). Production and applications of trehalose lipid biosurfactants. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, 112(6), 617–627. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.200900162
  13. Gautam, K. K., & Tyagi, V. K. (2006). Microbial surfactants: A review. Journal of Oleo Science, 55(4), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.5650/jos.55.155
  14. Georgiou, G., Lin, S.-C., & Sharma, M. M. (1992). Surface-active compounds from microorganisms. *Bio/Technology, 10*(1), 60–65. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0192-60
  15. Gharaei-Fathabad, E. (2011). Biosurfactants in pharmaceutical industry: A mini-review. American Journal of Drug Discovery and Development, 1(1), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajdd.2011.58.69
  16. Holt, J. G., Krieg, N. R., Sneath, P. H. A., Staley, J. T., & Williams, S. T. (Eds.). (1994). Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology (9th ed.). Williams & Wilkins.
  17. Hommel, R. K., & Ratledge, C. (1993). Biosynthetic mechanisms of low molecular weight surfactants and their precursor molecules. In N. Kosaric (Ed.), Biosurfactants: Production, properties, applications (pp. 3–63). Marcel Dekker.
  18. Jain, D. K., Collins-Thompson, D. L., Lee, H., & Trevors, J. T. (1991). A drop-collapsing test for screening surfactant-producing microorganisms. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 13(4), 271–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7012(91)90064-W
  19. Karlapudi, A. P., Venkateswarulu, T. C., Tammineedi, J., Srirama, K., Kanumuri, L., & Kodali, V. P. (2018). A review on biosurfactant production by microbial sources. Journal of Power and Energy Engineering, 6(4), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.4236/jpee.2018.64004
  20. Kitamoto, D., Isoda, H., & Nakahara, T. (2002). Functions and potential applications of glycolipid biosurfactants. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 94(3), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-1723(02)80149-9
  21. Lang, S. (2002). Biological amphiphiles (microbial surfactants). Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science, 7(1–2), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-0294(02)00007-4
  22. Lang, S., & Wullbrandt, D. (1999). Rhamnose lipids Biosynthesis, microbial production and application potential. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 51(1), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530051358
  23. Li, Y., & Yu, H. (2011). Biosurfactants from Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Production and applications. In M. N. V. Prasad (Ed.), Heavy metal pollution and its eco-toxicological effects (pp. 187–209). I.K. International Publishing House.
  24. Makkar, R. S., Cameotra, S. S., & Banat, I. M. (2011). Advances in utilization of renewable substrates for biosurfactant production. AMB Express, 1(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/2191-0855-1-5
  25. Manikandan, S., & Ganesapandian, S. (2011). Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of urinary tract infection causing human pathogenic bacteria. Asian Journal of Medical Sciences, 3(2), 56–60.
  26. Marchant, R., & Banat, I. M. (2012). Biosurfactants: A sustainable replacement for chemical surfactants? Biotechnology Letters, 34(9), 1597–1605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-012-0956-x
  27. MarketsandMarkets. (2017). Biosurfactants market by type (glycolipids, lipopeptides, phospholipids, polymeric biosurfactants), application (detergents, personal care, agricultural chemicals, food processing), and region – Global forecast to 2022. MarketsandMarkets Research Private Ltd.
  28. Morikawa, M., Hirata, Y., & Imanaka, T. (2000). A study on the structure–function relationship of lipopeptide biosurfactants. *Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids, 1488*(3), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-1981(00)00124-4
  29. Mulligan, C. N. (2005). Environmental applications for biosurfactants. Environmental Pollution, 133(2), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2004.06.009
  30. Mulligan, C. N. (2009). Recent advances in the environmental applications of biosurfactants. Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science, 14(5), 372–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocis.2009.06.005
  31. Nitschke, M., & Costa, S. G. V. A. O. (2007). Biosurfactants in food industry. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 18(5), 252–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2007.01.002
  32. Nitschke, M., & Silva, S. S. (2018). Recent food applications of microbial surfactants. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 58(4), 631–638. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2016.1208635
  33. Onwukwe, C. D., Nwachukwu, I. N., & Ogbulie, J. N. (2025). Process optimization for biosurfactant production from Alcaligenes spp. using response surface methodology. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 8(12), 1377–1394.
  34. Pacwa-Płociniczak, M., Płaza, G. A., Piotrowska-Seget, Z., & Cameotra, S. S. (2011). Environmental applications of biosurfactants: Recent advances. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 12(1), 633–654. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms12010633
  35. Peypoux, F., Bonmatin, J. M., & Wallach, J. (1999). Recent trends in the biochemistry of surfactin. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 51(5), 553–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530051432
  36. Plaza, G. A., Zjawiony, I., & Banat, I. M. (2006). Use of different methods for detection of thermophilic biosurfactant-producing bacteria from hydrocarbon-contaminated and bioremediated soils. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 50(1), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2005.10.005
  37. Ron, E. Z., & Rosenberg, E. (2001). Natural roles of biosurfactants. Environmental Microbiology, 3(4), 229–236. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1462-2920.2001.00190.x
  38. Rosenberg, E., & Ron, E. Z. (1999). High- and low-molecular-mass microbial surfactants. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 52(2), 154–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530051502
  39. Sachdev, D. P., & Cameotra, S. S. (2013). Biosurfactants in agriculture. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 97(3), 1005–1016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-012-4641-8
  40. Santos, D. K. F., Rufino, R. D., Luna, J. M., Santos, V. A., & Sarubbo, L. A. (2016). Biosurfactants: Multifunctional biomolecules of the 21st century. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 17(3), 401. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17030401
  41. Satpute, S. K., Bhawsar, B. D., Dhakephalkar, P. K., & Chopade, B. A. (2008). Assessment of different screening methods for selecting biosurfactant-producing marine bacteria. Indian Journal of Marine Sciences, 37(3), 243–250.
  42. Sen, R. (2010). Biosurfactants. In K. N. Timmis (Ed.), Handbook of hydrocarbon and lipid microbiology (pp. 2477–2488). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77587-4_184
  43. Soberón-Chávez, G., Lépine, F., & Déziel, E. (2005). Production of rhamnolipids by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 68(6), 718–725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-005-0150-3
  44. Storme, O., Saucedo, J. T., Garcia-Mora, A., Dehesa-Dávila, M., & Naber, K. G. (2019). Risk factors and predisposing conditions for urinary tract infection. Therapeutic Advances in Urology, 11, 1756287218814382. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756287218814382
  45. Tabatabaee, A., Mazaheri Assadi, M., Noohi, A. A., & Sajadian, V. A. (2005). Isolation of biosurfactant producing bacteria from oil reservoirs. Iranian Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering, 2(1), 6–12.
  46. Van Hamme, J. D., Singh, A., & Ward, O. P. (2006). Physiological aspects of biosurfactants in microbial growth and biodegradation. Biotechnology Advances, 24(6), 604–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2006.08.001
  47. Varjani, S. J., & Upasani, V. N. (2017). Critical review on biosurfactant analysis, purification and characterization using rhamnolipid as a model biosurfactant. Bioresource Technology, 232, 389–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.02.047
  48. Vijayakumar, S., & Saravanan, V. (2015). Biosurfactants-types, sources and applications. Research Journal of Microbiology, 10(5), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.3923/jm.2015.181.192
  49. Weekes, L. M. (2015). Antibiotic resistance changing management of urinary tract infections in aged care. Medical Journal of Australia, 203(9), 352. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja15.00687
  50. Youssef, N. H., Duncan, K. E., Nagle, D. P., Savage, K. N., Knapp, R. M., & McInerney, M. J. (2004). Comparison of methods to detect biosurfactant production by diverse microorganisms. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 56(3), 339–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2003.11.001

Biosurfactants, which are surface-active molecules of microbial origin, are garnering significant attention as sustainable substitutes for synthetic surfactants. Their appeal lies in their inherent biocompatibility, environmental degradability, and stable performance across a range of physicochemical conditions. A primary impediment to their industrial adoption, however, is the substantial expense associated with fermentation feedstocks. The present investigation evaluates the efficacy of groundnut oil, a low-cost agricultural by-product, as an exclusive carbon substrate for the cost- effective microbial synthesis of biosurfactants. A consortium of a bacterial strains, isolated from hydrocarbon- contaminated soil, underwent primary screening for biosurfactant production. This screening employed a tripartite methodological approach: the oil-spreading technique, the drop-collapse assay, and the determination of the emulsification index (E24). Among the evaluated isolates, Micrococcus sp. strain LB11 demonstrated superior surface-activity traits, manifesting a 15 mm zone of oil\displacement and a rapid reduction in interfacial tension evidenced by a 45-second drop- collapse duration. While Alcaligenes faecalis (IS-7) displayed a considerable capacity for emulsion stabilization, Micrococcus sp. LB11 emerged as the most proficient candidate when propagated in a medium formulated with groundnut oil. Cultivation of Micrococcus sp. LB11 on this lipid substrate facilitated the generation of a biosurfactant achieving an E24 value of approximately 65% over a 24-hour incubation period. This quantitative measure of emulsion stability indicates the synthesis of a high-quality, robust biosurfactant. The magnitude of the emulsifying activity further suggests the production of a high-molecular-weight compound, potentially possessing a glycoproteinaceous character. These outcomes collectively validate groundnut oil as a proficient and economical substrate for augmenting biosurfactant yield. In summary, these findings position Micrococcus sp. LB11 as a highly promising isolate warranting in-depth biochemical analysis and scale-up exploration. The resultant biosurfactant holds considerable promise for deployment in environmentally pertinent applications, including but not limited to soil and water bioremediation, microbial-enhanced hydrocarbon recovery, and various green technological processes.

Keywords : Micrococcus sp. LB11, Groundnut Oil, Glycoprotein Biosurfactant, Biosurfactant Production, Sustainable Substrate, Emulsification Index (E24), Stable Emulsion Formation, Low-Cost Fermentation, Agro-Industrial Waste Valorization, Microbial Surface-Active Agents.

CALL FOR PAPERS


Paper Submission Last Date
31 - December - 2025

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe