Authors :
Dr Kgoshi Kgashane Lucas Pilusa
Volume/Issue :
Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 8 - August
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/33x4bp59
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/2s49ec2a
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24AUG112
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
The decentralization of Water Service
Authority (WSA) from District Municipalities to Local
Municipalities in South Africa aims to enhance service
delivery, improve efficiency, and foster local
accountability. This study investigates the potential
benefits and challenges associated with this
decentralization process. Through a comprehensive
review of policy documents, case studies, and
stakeholder interviews, this research explores the impact
on water service quality, financial management, and
community engagement. The findings suggest that
decentralization can lead to more responsive and
context-specific water management practices, although it
also poses significant challenges in terms of capacity
building and resource allocation.
Keywords :
Decentralization, Water Service Authority, Local Municipalities, District Municipalities, South Africa.
References :
- Bakker, K. (2010). Privatizing Water: Governance Failure and the World's Urban Water Crisis. Cornell University Press.
- Bardhan, P., & Mookherjee, D. (2006). Decentralization and Local Governance in Developing Countries: A Comparative Perspective. MIT Press.
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
- Boex, J. (2011). Exploring the measurement and effectiveness of the local public sector: Toward a classification of local public sector finances and a comparison of devolved and deconcentrated financing of local public services. Urban Institute Center on International Development and Governance.
- Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing Grounded Theory. Sage Publications.
- Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
- Creswell, J.W. & Creswell, J.D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
- Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications.
- Dzikus, A., & Seeger, C. (2008). Capacity Building for Local Water Management. UN-HABITAT.
- Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The Qualitative Content Analysis Process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107-115.
- Faguet, J.-P. (2014). Decentralization and Local Governance in Developing Countries: A Comparative Perspective. Routledge.
- Gómez-Limón, J. A., Riesgo, L., & Moreno, B. (2014). The Effect of Decentralization on Water Resources Management in Spain. Water Resources Management, 28(8), 2357-2370.
- Heinrich, A., & Schmid, J. (2004). Local Water Governance in Germany: A Comparative Analysis. Water Policy, 6(4), 333-346.
- Hoebink, P. (2012). Community Participation and Decentralized Water Management in Brazil: A Case Study. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 4(8), 56-66.
- Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). Interviews’: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. Sage Publications.
- Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2016). Designing Qualitative Research. Sage Publications.
- McGranahan, G., & Satterthwaite, D. (2006). Governance and Getting the Private Sector to Provide Better Water and Sanitation Services to the Urban Poor. International Institute for Environment and Development.
- Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Sage Publications.
- Muller, M. (2008). Free basic water—a sustainable instrument for a sustainable future in South Africa. Environment and Urbanization, 20(1), 67-87.
- Murray, C., & Williams, R. (2019). Innovative Technologies for Water Management: The Role of Digital Solutions in Decentralization. Water Resources Management, 33(12), 3507-3524.
- Nowell, L.S., Norris, J.M., White, D.E., & Moules, N.J. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1-13.
- Oates, W. E. (1999). An Essay on Fiscal Federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(3), 1120-1149.
- Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press.
- Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (2004). The Politics of Bureaucracy. Routledge.
- Republic of South Africa, (1996). Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996. Government Printers. Pretoria
- Republic of South Africa. (1997). Water Services Act. Act No. 108 of 1997. Government Printers. Pretoria
- Republic of South Africa. (1998). National Water Act. Act No. 36 of 1998. Government Printers. Pretoria
- Republic of South Africa. (1998). Municipal Structures Act. Act No. 117 of 1998. Government Printers. Pretoria
- Republic of South Africa. (2000). Municipal Systems Act. Act No. 32 of 2000. Government Printers. Pretoria
- Rondinelli, D. A. (1981). Government decentralization in comparative perspective: Theory and practice in developing countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 47(2), 133-145.
- Shah, T., & Van Koppen, B. (2006). Is India ripe for integrated water resources management? Fitting water policy to national development context. Economic and Political Weekly, 41(31), 3413-3421.
- Smit, W. (2013). Water Governance in South Africa: Lessons from Mbombela Municipality. University of Stellenbosch.
- Smoke, P. (2015). Rethinking Decentralization: Assessing Challenges to a Popular Public Sector Reform. Public Administration and Development.
- Spradley, J. P. (2016). Participant Observation. Waveland Press.
- Swatuk, L. A. (2017). Water in Southern Africa. In: A. Rieu-Clarke, A. Allan, & S. Hendry (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Water Law and Policy. Routledge.
- Thompson, L. (2006). A History of South Africa. Yale University Press.
- Van Rooyen, J., & Van Rooyen, M. (2011). Decentralized Water Management in KwaZulu-Natal: The uMngeni Municipality Experience. Water Research Commission.
- Wambua, M., & Muli, C. (2016). Challenges and Opportunities in the Decentralization of Water Services in Kenya. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 32(1), 129-146.
- World Bank. (2011). Financing Water and Sanitation Services: Options and Policy Implications. World Bank.
- Wunsch, J. S., & Olowu, D. (1995). The Failure of the Centralized State: Institutions and Self-Governance in Africa. Westview Press.
- Ziervogel, G., Shale, M., & Du, M. (2010). Climate change adaptation in a developing country context: The case of urban water supply in Cape Town. Climate and Development, 2(2), 94-110.
The decentralization of Water Service
Authority (WSA) from District Municipalities to Local
Municipalities in South Africa aims to enhance service
delivery, improve efficiency, and foster local
accountability. This study investigates the potential
benefits and challenges associated with this
decentralization process. Through a comprehensive
review of policy documents, case studies, and
stakeholder interviews, this research explores the impact
on water service quality, financial management, and
community engagement. The findings suggest that
decentralization can lead to more responsive and
context-specific water management practices, although it
also poses significant challenges in terms of capacity
building and resource allocation.
Keywords :
Decentralization, Water Service Authority, Local Municipalities, District Municipalities, South Africa.