Authors : Ma. Teresa E. Rebojo

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 6 - June

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/2tddpshb

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25jun041

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : Homework remains a widely used instructional tool in basic education, yet its value is often debated. This study aimed to explore the perspectives of junior high school teachers regarding the practice of assigning homework. It focused on identifying the challenges they encounter, the coping mechanisms they employ, and the insights they hold about the educational value of homework. A qualitative research design using phenomenology was employed to capture the lived experiences of eight junior high school teachers, with two teachers representing each grade level. Data were collected through in-depth interviews guided by a semi-structured interview guide. Thematic analysis, based on Braun and Clarke’s (2006) framework, was used to analyze the data. Five major challenges were identified: lack of student motivation, limited home resources, time constraints in curriculum coverage, issues in parental involvement, and variation in students' academic abilities. Teachers addressed these challenges through strategies such as designing engaging, low-cost, and differentiated homework; integrating tasks with daily lessons; and improving communication with parents. From these experiences, three key insights emerged: homework must be context-sensitive, effective communication supports success, and flexibility is crucial in overcoming homework-related barriers. The study reveals the need for responsive and inclusive homework practices that consider the lived realities of students in public schools.

Keywords : Homework, Teacher Perspectives, Junior High School, Phenomenology, Coping Strategies, Educational Insights, Qualitative Research, Philippines.

References :

1. American Psychological Association. (2016). Is homework a necessary evil?. https://www.apa.org/monitor/2016/03/homework
2. Associated Press. (2024, April 11). Poland's kids rejoice over new rules against homework. Teachers and parents aren't so sure. AP News. https://apnews.com/article/597c361c08eaaa1ea87f0bdf444df3c8
3. Boyce, C., & Neale, P. (2006). Conducting In-Depth Interviews: A Guide for Designing and Conducting In-Depth Interviews for Evaluation Input. Pathfinder International. https://pathfinderinternational.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Pathfinder-International-Tool-Series-In-Depth-Interviews.pdf
4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
5. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-assets/110627_book_item_110627.pdf
6. Education Endowment Foundation. (2021). Homework. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/education-evidence/teaching-learning-toolkit/homework
7. Educational Technology. (n.d.). Constructivist Learning Theory. Retrieved from https://educationaltechnology.net/constructivist-learning-theory/
8. Galloway, M. K., Conner, J., & Pope, D. (2013). Nonacademic effects of homework in privileged, high-performing high schools. The Journal of Experimental Education, 81(4), 490-510. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2012.745469
9. Geverola, I. J. R., Mutya, R. C., Siason, L. M. B., & Bonotan, A. (2022). Challenges and struggles of public senior high school science teachers during the new normal. Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers and Teacher Education, 12(1), 49-68. https://doi.org/10.37134/jrpptte.vol12.1.4.2022
10. Guru at Home. (2023). The Pros and Cons of Homework: An In-Depth Analysis. https://guruathome.org/blog/the-pros-and-cons-of-homework/
11. Instruction in Libraries and Information Centers. (n.d.). Learning Theories: Understanding How People Learn. Retrieved from https://iopn.library.illinois.edu/pressbooks/instructioninlibraries/chapter/learning-theories-understanding-how-people-learn/
12. Kallio, H., Pietilä, A.-M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi‐structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954-2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031
13. Keck, J. E. (2020). Middle School Teachers’ Perceptions of Homework Assignments Effective at Increasing Student Homework Completion. University of New England. https://dune.une.edu/theses/328/
14. Kohn, A. (2006). The homework myth: Why our kids get too much of a bad thing. Da Capo Press.
15. Kukliansky, I., Eilam, B., & Chen, D. (2020). Teachers’ perspectives on homework: manifestations of culturally responsive teaching. Educational Review, 72(5), 563-581. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2020.1806786
16. Leung, M. (2019). The impact of homework stress on students' academic performance and well-being. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(3), 450-465. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000307
17. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications. https://www.qualres.org/HomeLinc-3684.html
18. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
19. Moorhouse, B. L. (2021). Qualities of good homework activities: teachers’ perceptions. ELT Journal, 75(3), 300–310. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccaa069
20. Núñez, J. C., Suárez, N., Rosário, P., Vallejo, G., Valle, A., & Epstein, J. L. (2015). Relationships between perceived parental involvement in homework, student homework behaviors, and academic achievement: Differences among elementary, junior high, and high school students. Metacognition and Learning, 10(3), 375-406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-015-9135-5
21. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://methods.sagepub.com
22. Ponterotto, J. G. (2005). Qualitative Research in Counseling Psychology: A Primer on Research Paradigms and Philosophy of Science. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 126–136. https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/34283/chapter/290632180
23. ProCon.org. (2021). Homework Pros and Cons. https://www.procon.org/headlines/homework-pros-cons-procon-org/
24. Rosário, P., Cunha, J., Nunes, T., Nunes, A. R., Moreira, T., & Núñez, J. C. (2019). “Homework should be…but we do not live in an ideal world”: Mathematics teachers’ perspectives on quality homework and on homework assigned in elementary and middle schools. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 224. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00224
25. Snead, D., & Burris, K. G. (2016). Middle School Teachers' Perceptions Regarding the Motivation and Effectiveness of Homework. Journal of Inquiry and Action in Education, 7(2), 62–80. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1133590
26. Zhang, Y., & Carrasquillo, A. L. (1995). Chinese parents' influence on academic performance. New York State Association for Bilingual Education Journal, 10, 46-53.