Authors :
Dr. Kalpana Pawar Patil; Dr. Shivani Vyavahare; Dr. Sadashiv Daokar; Dr. Komal Potfode; Dr. Kshama Sarak; Dr. Madhuri Khatod
Volume/Issue :
Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 1 - January
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/22n4jjkn
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/55v69zzk
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JAN1513
Abstract :
Background:
Endodontically treated teeth are thought to be more
prone to fracture. The last stage in a successful root
canal treatment is to restore root canal-treated teeth
with a permanent, definitive postendodontic restoration.
Dehydration, dentin loss during endodontic procedures,
and the elimination of significant anatomic elements like
cusps, ridges, and the pulp chamber's arched roof—all of
which contribute significantly to the normal tooth's
support—are the causes of the fracture of endodontically
treated teeth.
Consequently, intracoronal strengthening is
necessary to prevent tooth fracture, especially in the
posterior teeth where compressive stresses brought on by
occlusal forces can cause tooth fractures.1
Since core materials typically replace a significant
portion of the tooth structure and must withstand
multidirectional masticatory forces,their compressive
strength is crucial.2
Aim:
The purpose of this study was to compare the
compressive strengths of three direct post enododontic
restorations.
Material and Methods:
There are thirty extracted maxillary premolars
chosen. After receiving root canal therapy, the teeth
were divided randomly into three groups for immediate
post-endodontic restorations: (i) silver amalgam
(ii)Fiber-reinforced composite resin (iii) dual cure glass-
reinforced composite resin . After that, a Universal
Testing Machine was used to apply compressive stress on
the teeth.
Statistical Analysis:
Fracture loads will be compared statistically, and
the data will be analysed using version 21.0 of SPSS
software, analysis of variance and the Post-hoc test for
multiple comparisons.
Result and Conclusion:
Within the limits of the study, it showed that the
post hoc tests reveal that the mean difference of
compressive load strength is significant between all the
groups, Amalgam has highest load strength followed by
Fiber reinforced composite. Dual cure composite has
lowest compressive load strength.
Background:
Endodontically treated teeth are thought to be more
prone to fracture. The last stage in a successful root
canal treatment is to restore root canal-treated teeth
with a permanent, definitive postendodontic restoration.
Dehydration, dentin loss during endodontic procedures,
and the elimination of significant anatomic elements like
cusps, ridges, and the pulp chamber's arched roof—all of
which contribute significantly to the normal tooth's
support—are the causes of the fracture of endodontically
treated teeth.
Consequently, intracoronal strengthening is
necessary to prevent tooth fracture, especially in the
posterior teeth where compressive stresses brought on by
occlusal forces can cause tooth fractures.1
Since core materials typically replace a significant
portion of the tooth structure and must withstand
multidirectional masticatory forces,their compressive
strength is crucial.2
Aim:
The purpose of this study was to compare the
compressive strengths of three direct post enododontic
restorations.
Material and Methods:
There are thirty extracted maxillary premolars
chosen. After receiving root canal therapy, the teeth
were divided randomly into three groups for immediate
post-endodontic restorations: (i) silver amalgam
(ii)Fiber-reinforced composite resin (iii) dual cure glass-
reinforced composite resin . After that, a Universal
Testing Machine was used to apply compressive stress on
the teeth.
Statistical Analysis:
Fracture loads will be compared statistically, and
the data will be analysed using version 21.0 of SPSS
software, analysis of variance and the Post-hoc test for
multiple comparisons.
Result and Conclusion:
Within the limits of the study, it showed that the
post hoc tests reveal that the mean difference of
compressive load strength is significant between all the
groups, Amalgam has highest load strength followed by
Fiber reinforced composite. Dual cure composite has
lowest compressive load strength.
