Authors :
Dr. Devinder Dhalla; Paras Dhalla
Volume/Issue :
Volume 7 - 2022, Issue 6 - June
Google Scholar :
https://bit.ly/3IIfn9N
Scribd :
https://bit.ly/3n1cHeV
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6668831
Abstract :
Generation gap is a dilemma observed
between young people and their older generations due to
different variables. There are a number of problems
between different generations due to many reasons such
as lack of relevance, alternative perspectives, social
factors and the impact of innovation difficult to see each
other. Purpose: The aim of this study was to understand
the generation gap and personality profile of individuals
amongst different generations in Indian context
whereas“Pre-Liberalization Generation” (Pre-1991),
“Early Liberalization Generation” (1992-2001), “Rapid
Growth Generation” (2002-2006), & “Plateau Growth
Generation” (2007-2012) and current generation as
“Computer Generation” is been taken and considered to
be a part of study. Although various earlier studies
revealed that there is a generation gap, so in this
research we performed an explorative study in context to
six dimensions: Social Expectation, Economic
Development, Distinct attitude, Communication Gap,
Education and Technology with a congruency to
generations in Indian context. (Generations are been
taken as per Srinivasan earlier study).
Sample & Method: Two hundred fifty individuals from
different type of families (125 from nuclear families and
125 from joint families) categorized under five
generations completed theGGQ:(A self-administered
generation gap questionnaire) to find the generational
gap which included 30 questions each onto six
dimensions of generation gap taken in our current
research study. Correspondingly personality factors
questionnaire (16 P.F.)was used to find the differences in
personality profiles amongst generations.
Tools: As a part of statistical tools being used, we
calculated standard deviation and mean of each
generation onto dimensions using GGQ Likert scale
data. For testing of hypothesis calculation of mean values
t-test, one-way ANOVA along with multivariate analysis
of variance (MANOVA) correlating sixteen personality
factors (16 P.F. assessment) was used to interpret the
scoring and to analyze individual personality to fulfill
objective of the study.
Results:
H1 - The study revealed that there is a generation
gapusing six dimensions: social expectation, economic
development, distinct attitude, communication gap,
education and technology among generations on GGQ.
H2:Study revealed that there is a statistical difference in
personality profiles of different type of families (Nuclear
and Joint) amongst different generations.
H3: Study revealed that there is a significant difference
in personality profiles amongst generations.
Conclusion: 16 P.F. is a useful tool to examine
personality profile differences amongst the generations
and to understand the factors that build their
personalities. Given differences amongst the generations,
the researcher forecast possible causes as six dimensions
taken in the present study.Suggestive measures are also
been disclosed in the study to bridge the gap and to make
the individuals personality a dynamic, versatile and to
lead happier life head.
Keywords :
Personality traits, Personality factors, Generation gap, Personality profile
Generation gap is a dilemma observed
between young people and their older generations due to
different variables. There are a number of problems
between different generations due to many reasons such
as lack of relevance, alternative perspectives, social
factors and the impact of innovation difficult to see each
other. Purpose: The aim of this study was to understand
the generation gap and personality profile of individuals
amongst different generations in Indian context
whereas“Pre-Liberalization Generation” (Pre-1991),
“Early Liberalization Generation” (1992-2001), “Rapid
Growth Generation” (2002-2006), & “Plateau Growth
Generation” (2007-2012) and current generation as
“Computer Generation” is been taken and considered to
be a part of study. Although various earlier studies
revealed that there is a generation gap, so in this
research we performed an explorative study in context to
six dimensions: Social Expectation, Economic
Development, Distinct attitude, Communication Gap,
Education and Technology with a congruency to
generations in Indian context. (Generations are been
taken as per Srinivasan earlier study).
Sample & Method: Two hundred fifty individuals from
different type of families (125 from nuclear families and
125 from joint families) categorized under five
generations completed theGGQ:(A self-administered
generation gap questionnaire) to find the generational
gap which included 30 questions each onto six
dimensions of generation gap taken in our current
research study. Correspondingly personality factors
questionnaire (16 P.F.)was used to find the differences in
personality profiles amongst generations.
Tools: As a part of statistical tools being used, we
calculated standard deviation and mean of each
generation onto dimensions using GGQ Likert scale
data. For testing of hypothesis calculation of mean values
t-test, one-way ANOVA along with multivariate analysis
of variance (MANOVA) correlating sixteen personality
factors (16 P.F. assessment) was used to interpret the
scoring and to analyze individual personality to fulfill
objective of the study.
Results:
H1 - The study revealed that there is a generation
gapusing six dimensions: social expectation, economic
development, distinct attitude, communication gap,
education and technology among generations on GGQ.
H2:Study revealed that there is a statistical difference in
personality profiles of different type of families (Nuclear
and Joint) amongst different generations.
H3: Study revealed that there is a significant difference
in personality profiles amongst generations.
Conclusion: 16 P.F. is a useful tool to examine
personality profile differences amongst the generations
and to understand the factors that build their
personalities. Given differences amongst the generations,
the researcher forecast possible causes as six dimensions
taken in the present study.Suggestive measures are also
been disclosed in the study to bridge the gap and to make
the individuals personality a dynamic, versatile and to
lead happier life head.
Keywords :
Personality traits, Personality factors, Generation gap, Personality profile