Authors :
Tshibamba Mukendi John; Mpiana Tshimanga Vincent; Landu Ndambu Gaston; Mukendi Kamambo Robert; Mutombo Tshibamba Jean-Michel; Kayombo Mbumba André
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 7 - July
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/3jyw47hn
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/4mht8jnz
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jul1866
Note : A published paper may take 4-5
working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and
ResearchGate.
Abstract :
Cowpea is a grain legume, rich in proteins, carbohydrates, vitamins, and minerals. It enriches the soil through its
biological nitrogen fixation capacity, thanks to rhizobia associated with its roots. Unfortunately, in sub-Saharan Africa,
particularly in the Democratic Republic of Congo, within the territory of Tshilenge, the production of this crop faces biotic
constraints. The most frequent diseases are anthracnose, cercosporiosis, and viral mosaic, as well as attacks by Anoplocnemis
curvipes and Ootheca mutabilis. As a hypothesis for this study, we assume that certain cowpea cultivars would be tolerant
while others would be susceptible to the major pathologies and pests in the Tshilenge region. The objective of this study is
to identify the most tolerant and most susceptible cowpea cultivars to major pathological and pest pressures on sub-Saharan
ferralsols in the Tshilenge region, Kasaï Oriental, through experimentation at different sowing dates. The results reveal that
certain cultivars stand out for their remarkable tolerance, while others express increased susceptibility to major pathologies
and pests. Cultivars C6 (index = 0), C1 (0.708), and C14 (0.744) are the most tolerant; their low index reflects high tolerance
and stability against various pathogenic and entomological pressures. Conversely, cultivars C13 (2.95), C9 (2.97), and C8
(3.00) are highly susceptible; their high index reflects strong vulnerability to diseases, limiting their agronomic value under
conditions of high pathogenic and entomological pressure.
Keywords :
Tolerance, Susceptibility, Cultivar, Cowpea, Pressure, Diseases, Pests, Ferralsol, Sub-Saharan.
References :
- Abdoulaye Zakari Ousséisna, Baoua Ibrahim, Amadou Laouali, Tamò Manuele, & Pittendrigh Barry Robert. (2019). Les contraintes entomologiques de la culture du niébé et leur mode de gestion par les producteurs dans les régions de Maradi et Zinder au Niger. Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci., 13(3), 1286-1299.
- Ahmed, B.I., Onu, I., & Mudi, L. (2009). Field bioefficacy of plant extracts for the control of post flowering insect pests of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) in Nigeria. Journal of Biopesticides, 2(1), 37-43.
- Akande, S.R., Olakojo, S.A., Ajayi, S.A., Owolade, O.F., Adetumbi, J.A., Adeniyan, O.N., & Ogunbodede, B.A. (2012). Planting date affects cowpea seed yield and quality at Southern Guinea Savanna, Nigeria. Seed Technology, 34, 51-60.
- Akanza Kouadjo Paul, N'Da Hugues Annicet, & Gbakatchetche Henri Cousin. (2020). La culture du niébé : bon précédent cultural du maïs en Côte d'Ivoire. Journal of Applied Biosciences, 149, 15338-15343.
- Bila Mulungu Hubert, Kambi Dibaya Okitolo Longo Alphonse, & Tshibamba Mukendi John. (2025). Effets de dates de semis et de doses croissantes de l'extrait aqueux de Bidens pilosa L. sur la production de niébé (Vigna unguiculata L. Walper), variété Dolique dans la région de Kabinda/RDC. Revue Internationale de la Recherche Scientifique et de l'Innovation (Revue-IRSI), 3(6), 1462-1474.
- Chiang, K., Liu, H., & Bock, C.H. (2017). A discussion on disease severity index values: Warnings on inherent errors and suggestions for maximizing accuracy. Annals of Applied Biology, 171, 139-154.
- Dugje, I.Y., Omoigui, L.O., Ekeleme, F., Kamara, A.Y., & Ajeigbe, H. (2009). Farmers' Guide to Cowpea Production in West Africa. Ibadan, Nigeria: International Institute of Tropical Agriculture.
- Gbaguidi, A.A. (2015). Caractérisation agromorphologique des variétés de Niébé au Bénin. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 9(2), 1050-1066.
- Kayode Ezekiel Ogunsola, Christopher Ilori, Christian A. Fatokun, Ousmane Boukar, Patricia Ogunsanya, & P. Lava Kumar. (2020). Disease incidence and severity in cowpea lines evaluated for resistance to single and multiple infections of endemic viruses in Nigeria. Journal of Crop Improvement. DOI: 10.1080/15427528.2020.1824952
- Motis, T. (2020). Des variétés de niébé pour la saison chaude et pluvieuse. ECHO Development Notes, 148.
- Mpiana Tshimanga Vincent, Kambi Dibaya Okitolo Longo, & Tshibamba Mukendi John. (2026). Réponses des caractères de rendement des cultivars locaux de niébé (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) sous les dates de semis dans le territoire de Tshilenge, au Kasaï Oriental, RDC. Revue Internationale de la Recherche Scientifique (Revue-IRS), 4(2), 1643-1668.
- Omoigui, A.Y., Kamara, A.Y., Batieno, J., Iorlamen, T., Kouyate, Z., Yirzagla, J., Garba, U., & Diallo, S. (2018). Guide sur la production de niébé en Afrique de l'Ouest. Ibadan, Nigeria: IITA.
- Sereme. (1999). La maladie des taches brunes du niébé [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] au Burkina Faso: connaissance des agents pathogènes impliqués et développement de méthodes de lutte (Doctoral dissertation). Université de Cocody.
- Singh, B.B., Ehlers, J.D., Sharma, B., & Freire Filho, F.R. (2007). Recent progress in cowpea breeding. In Challenges and Opportunities for Enhancing Sustainable Cowpea Production (pp. 22-40).
- Singh, B.B., & Tarawali, S.A. (1997). Cowpea and its improvement: Key to sustainable mixed crop/livestock farming systems in West Africa. In C. Renard (Ed.), Crop Residues in Sustainable Mixed Crop/Livestock Farming Systems (pp. 79-100). Wallingford, UK: CAB in Association with ICRISAT and ILRI.
Cowpea is a grain legume, rich in proteins, carbohydrates, vitamins, and minerals. It enriches the soil through its
biological nitrogen fixation capacity, thanks to rhizobia associated with its roots. Unfortunately, in sub-Saharan Africa,
particularly in the Democratic Republic of Congo, within the territory of Tshilenge, the production of this crop faces biotic
constraints. The most frequent diseases are anthracnose, cercosporiosis, and viral mosaic, as well as attacks by Anoplocnemis
curvipes and Ootheca mutabilis. As a hypothesis for this study, we assume that certain cowpea cultivars would be tolerant
while others would be susceptible to the major pathologies and pests in the Tshilenge region. The objective of this study is
to identify the most tolerant and most susceptible cowpea cultivars to major pathological and pest pressures on sub-Saharan
ferralsols in the Tshilenge region, Kasaï Oriental, through experimentation at different sowing dates. The results reveal that
certain cultivars stand out for their remarkable tolerance, while others express increased susceptibility to major pathologies
and pests. Cultivars C6 (index = 0), C1 (0.708), and C14 (0.744) are the most tolerant; their low index reflects high tolerance
and stability against various pathogenic and entomological pressures. Conversely, cultivars C13 (2.95), C9 (2.97), and C8
(3.00) are highly susceptible; their high index reflects strong vulnerability to diseases, limiting their agronomic value under
conditions of high pathogenic and entomological pressure.
Keywords :
Tolerance, Susceptibility, Cultivar, Cowpea, Pressure, Diseases, Pests, Ferralsol, Sub-Saharan.