Authors : Mechelle R. Pacatang; Dr. Remigilda Gallardo

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 6 - June

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/25k8wypm

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25jun531

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : This study explored the lived experiences, challenges encountered, coping mechanisms and insights of public elementary school teachers on transitioning to MATATAG curriculum in schools. The participants were coming from Paquibato District, Division of Davao City, DepEd Region XI. There were ten (10) elementary school teachers who participated in the study. This study made use of a phenomenological approach to extract the ideas from the participants. The participants were purposely selected as representatives from the group of elementary school teachers. The face to face in-depth interview was employed to gather significant information with regard to their respective lived experiences. Using the thematic analysis, the following themes emerged pertaining to their lived experiences: shift toward learner centered instruction, emotional investment in teaching, and rediscovery of purpose. Further, there were three sub-themes that emerged from the challenges by the participants. These are technological and resource limitations, curriculum overload and time, parental and community disconnect and hurdling transition challenges. The three coping mechanisms of teachers as participants in the challenges they experienced were collaboration and support systems, mindset shifts, and self-initiated professional learning. The three educational management insights drawn from the participants were emphasis on curriculum mastery, the significance of values integration and collaboration and support as success enablers. Thus, it is crucial for DepEd administrators to cultivate a culture of collaboration, innovation, and emotional support by organizing regular LAC sessions, supplying teaching resources, and enhancing teacher well-being.

Keywords : Lived Experiences, MATATAG curriculum, Elementary Schools, Public Teachers

References :

1. Abalde, G., & Oco, R. (2023). Factors Associated with Mathematics Performance.
2. Abragan, F., Abarcas, V., Aquino, I. M., & Bagongon, R. E. (2022). Research review on K-12 curriculum implementation in the Philippines: A literature analysis
3. Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2012). Factors influencing teachersâ adoption and integration of information and communication technology into teaching: A review of the literature. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 8(1).
4. Campbell C, Fullan M, (2018). Glaze A. A case study of educational reform in Ontario: The role of professional collaboration. Review of Educational Research. 2018; 88(2):311-355. Doi: 10.3102/0034654317751919
5. Churchwell, K., Elkind, M. S., Benjamin, R. M., Carson, A. P., Chang, E. K., Lawrence, W., ... & American Heart Association. (2020). Call to action: structural racism as a fundamental driver of health disparities: a presidential advisory from the American Heart
6. Cordova RS, Basas LM, Asto PB (2020). The Implementation of K-12 Curriculum Reforms in the Philippines: A Case Study of Teacher Challenges. Philippine Journal of Education. 97(1):25-42. Doi: https://doi.org/10.30835/pje.2020.1.0003
7. Cornu, R. L. (2005). Peer mentoring: Engaging pre‐service teachers in mentoring one another. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 13(3), 355-366.
8. Councils, G. A. (2014, April). Creating New Models Innovative Public-Private Partnerships     for Inclusive Development in Latin America. In Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.
9. David CC, Albert JRG, Vizmanos JFV.(2019). Education and Access to Primary and Secondary Education. Philippine Institute for Development Studies, Doi: 10.1080/02188791.2019.1663862
10. Department of Education [DepEd]. (2019). Policy Guidelines on the K-12 Basic Education Program. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/DO_s2019_021.pdf
11. Department of Education. DepEd Order No. 021, s. 2019, 2019. Retrieved from: https://www.deped.gov.ph
12. Department of Education. General Shaping Paper, 2023. Retrieved from: https://www.deped.gov.ph
13. DepEd Memorandum 54, s. 2023. Pilot Implementation of the MATATAG Curriculum. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-
14. Fernández-Giménez, M. E., Augustine, D. J., Porensky, L. M., Wilmer, H., Derner,      J. D., Briske, D. D., & Stewart, M. O. (2019). Complexity fosters learning in collaborative adaptive management. Ecology and Society, 24(2).
15. Gal, E., Schreur, N., & Engel-Yeger, B. (2010). Inclusion of Children with Disabilities: Teachers' Attitudes and Requirements for Environmental Accommodations. International journal of special education, 25(2), 89-99.
16. Garcia L, Martinez R. (2024). Public Perspectives on Curriculum and Education Reform. Contemporary Education Journal. 2024; 49(2):78-92.
17. Garcia M. (2020) Addressing Curriculum Overcrowding in Philippine Education. Journal of Educational Development. 2020; 45(2):123-135. Doi: 10.1016/j.jed.2020.06.007
18. Garcia PR, Santos JA. Assessing the early impacts of the MATATAG Curriculum     on student performance. Philippine Journal of Education. 2023; 99(2):321-345. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2991/jefr.2023.10120 generic perspective. European Journal of       Educational and Social Sciences, 7(1), 1-       8.
19. Germuth, A. A. (2018). Professional Development That Changes Teaching and Improves Learning. Journal of Interdisciplinary Teacher Leadership,                 2(1), 77-90.
20. Gomez R, Lee S, Kim J. (2020). Making Curriculum Relevant: Bridging Theory and Practice. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction. 2020; 15(2):112-125. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15505170.2020.1738032
21. Gouëdard, P., Pont, B., Hyttinen, S., & Huang, P. (2020). Curriculum reform: A literature review to support effective implementation.
22. Hajan, B. H., Castillo-Hajan, B., & Marasigan, A. C. (2019). Second Language Academic Writing: A Study of Teachers' Beliefs and Pedagogical Practices in Senior High School. Online Submission, 21, 9-35.
23. Hall E, Wall K. (2019). Teachers' engagement with educational research: Findings    from the UK. Education 3-13; 47(1):1-13. Doi: 10.1080/03004279.2019.1572068
24. Johnson A. (2023). Power Dynamics in Curriculum Design: Implications for Education Systems. Educational Research Review. 2023; 37(1):101-117.
25. Johnson L. (2024). The Necessity of Curriculum Reform for a Modern Education System. Contemporary Education Review. 2024; 42(1):48-59. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10509585.2024.2167034
26. Lee J. The Role of Curriculum in Citizen Training and Development (2023). Educational Perspectives. 2023; 40(1):29-43. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2023.2183407
27. Luz JM, Gregorio CE. (2024). Policy implications of the MATATAG Curriculum:      Lessons from the Philippine context. Educational Policy Analysis. 13(1):65- 80. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543201117
28. Mendoza LR, Abad MC. (2022).Teacher perceptions of the MATATAG Curriculum: Challenges and opportunities. Cogent Education. 9(1):2098754. Doi: 10.1080/2331186
29. Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2017). International results in      reading. Chestnut Hill, Mass.: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College, and International Association for the Evaluation of  Educational Achievement.
30. Naidoo, I. A. (2011). The role of monitoring and evaluation in promoting good governance   in South Africa: A case study of the Department of Social Development. Johannesburg: University of Witwatersrand.
31. Nguyen T. (2022). Risks of Curriculum Stagnation in Public Education. Public Education Journal.; 31(3):159- 172. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2022.2074156
32. Niemi H. (2021). Enhancing teacher professionalism through holistic teacher education in Finland. Cogent Education. 1899132. Doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2021.1899132
33. Padillo, G. G., Manguilimotan, R. P., Capuno, R. G., & Espina, R. C. (2021). Professional Development Activities and Teacher Performance. International Journal of Education and Practice, 9(3), 497-506.
34. Perry, L. B., & McConney, A. (2010). Does the SES of the school matter? An examination of socioeconomic status and student achievement using PISA 2003. Teachers college record, 112(4), 1137-1162
35. Peters, S. J. (2004). Inclusive education: An EFA strategy for all children.    Washington, DC:  World Bank, Human Development Network.
36. Pillay, H., & Panth, B. (2022). Foundational (K-12) Education System: Navigating   21st Century Challenges.
37. Roos, B. H., & Borkoski, C. C. (2021). Attending to the teacher in the teaching: Prioritizing     faculty well-being. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest              Groups, 6(4), 831-840.
38. Salend, S. J. (2010). Creating inclusive classrooms. Pearson Education.
39. Smith, W. C., & Benavot, A. (2019). Improving accountability in education: the importance                 of structured democratic voice. Asia Pacific Journal of  Education
40. Tan CS, Deneen CC, (2018). Examining teacher perceptions of critical thinking in    Singapore schools. Asia Pacific Education Review. 2018; 19(4):507-519. Doi: 10.1007/s12564-018-9535-7
41. Tarraya, H. O. (2023). Teachers' Workload Policy: Its Impact on Philippine Public   School Teachers (Public Policy Analysis and Review). Online Submission.
42. Teixeira, J., Amoroso, J., & Gresham, J. (2017). Why education infrastructure matters for learning. World Bank Blogs, on October, 3.
43. Tety, J. L. (2016). Role of Instructional Materials in Academic Performance in Community   Secondary Schools in Rombo District” (Doctoral dissertation, The Open University of Tanzania).
44. Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological     processes. Harvard university press.
45. Warren E, Miller J. (2020). Implementing the Australian Curriculum: A snapshot of perceptions from teachers. International Journal of Educational Research. 2020; 99:101508. Doi: 10.1080/13664530.2020.1835667
46. Young, V. M., & Kim, D. H. (2010). Using assessments for instructional improvement: A literature review. Education policy analysis archives, 18, 19-19.