Authors : Étienne Fakaba Sissoko; Pierre Bayo

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 4 - April

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/mr2azzw3

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/3tr9ctaa

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26apr1686

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : Budget reforms repeatedly fail in fragile states despite the widespread adoption of fiscal rules, program budgeting, and public financial management (PFM) reforms. This article argues that such failure stems from a systematic mislocation of budgetary authority in existing analytical frameworks. The article develops a theory of treasury power, defined as the institutional capacity to control the timing and prioritisation of payments under liquidity constraints. It shows that uncertainty over public resources transforms the budget constraint into a sequential and intra-annual liquidity constraint, weakening the binding character of ex ante allocations and shifting effective decision-making to the execution stage. Building on this mechanism, the article explains reform failure as an endogenous institutional equilibrium. Reforms that seek to reduce discretion by strengthening rules or procedures undermine the treasury’s adjustment function and are therefore systematically neutralised during execution. This interpretation is consistent with observed patterns of payment delays, arrears accumulation, and expenditure prioritisation in fragile contexts. The article contributes by relocating budgetary authority from allocation to execution, formalising the role of liquidity in budgetary decision-making, and providing a political economy explanation for persistent reform failure.

Keywords : Treasury Power; Budget Execution; Liquidity Constraints; Budgetary Authority; Reform Failure; Fragile States; Public Financial Management.

References :

1. Alesina, A., & Perotti, R. (1996). Fiscal discipline and the budget process. American Economic Review, 86(2), 401–407.
2. Allen, R., Hemming, R., & Potter, B. H. (Eds.). (2019). The international handbook of public financial management. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89273-9
3. Allen, R., & Tommasi, D. (Eds.). (2001). Managing public expenditure: A reference book for transition countries. OECD.
4. Andrews, M. (2013). The limits of institutional reform in development: Changing rules for realistic solutions. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139060974
5. Andrews, M., Pritchett, L., & Woolcock, M. (2017). Building state capability: Evidence, analysis, action. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198792449.001.0001
6. Besley, T., & Persson, T. (2011). Pillars of prosperity: The political economics of development clusters. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400839811
7. Cangiano, M., Curristine, T. R., & Lazare, M. (2013). Public financial management and its emerging architecture. International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781475531091.071
8. Diamond, J., & Schiller, C. (2020). Government finance statistics: Cash management and fiscal reporting. International Monetary Fund.
9. Fukuyama, F. (2013). What is governance? Governance, 26(3), 347–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12035
10. International Monetary Fund. (2010). Treasury single account: Concept, design, and implementation issues (Technical Notes and Manuals No. 2010/03). IMF.
11. International Monetary Fund. (2014). Cash management in government (Technical Notes and Manuals No. 2014/05). IMF.
12. International Monetary Fund. (2020). Public financial management and the COVID-19 pandemic: Cash management responses. IMF.
13. Lienert, I. (2009). Modernizing cash management (Technical Notes and Manuals No. 2009/03). International Monetary Fund.
14. Lienert, I. (2013). Cash and debt management in developing countries (IMF Working Paper). International Monetary Fund.
15. Moore, M. (2007). How does taxation affect the quality of governance? (IDS Working Paper No. 280). Institute of Development Studies.
16. North, D. C., Wallis, J. J., & Weingast, B. R. (2009). Violence and social orders: A conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511575839
17. Pattanayak, S. (2016). Expenditure arrears: Causes, consequences, and solutions (Technical Notes and Manuals). International Monetary Fund.
18. PEFA Secretariat. (2016). PEFA 2016: Framework for assessing public financial management (2nd ed.). PEFA.
19. Rajaram, A., Minh Le, T., Biletska, N., & Brumby, J. (2014). A diagnostic framework for assessing public investment management. World Bank.
20. République du Mali. (2021). Loi de finances pour l’exercice 2022. Ministère de l’Économie et des Finances.
21. République du Mali. (2022). Loi de finances pour l’exercice 2023. Ministère de l’Économie et des Finances.
22. République du Mali. (2023). Loi de finances pour l’exercice 2024. Ministère de l’Économie et des Finances.
23. République du Mali. (2024). Loi de finances pour l’exercice 2025. Ministère de l’Économie et des Finances.
24. République du Mali. (2025). Projet de loi de finances pour l’exercice 2026. Ministère de l’Économie et des Finances.
25. République du Mali. (2025). Document de programmation budgétaire et économique pluriannuelle 2026–2028. Ministère de l’Économie et des Finances.
26. République du Mali. (2025). Stratégie d’endettement public à moyen terme 2026–2028. Ministère de l’Économie et des Finances.
27. Schick, A. (1998). Why most developing countries should not try New Zealand’s reforms. World Bank Research Observer, 13(1), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/13.1.123
28. Simson, R., Sharma, N., & Aziz, I. (2011). A guide to public financial management literature. Overseas Development Institute.
29. Sissoko, E. F., & Dembele, K. (2026). Concevoir la loi de finances en contexte de fragilité : Une analyse institutionnelle comparative des États sahéliens. Revue Française d'Économie et de Gestion, 7(2).
30. Sissoko, E. F. ., Guindo, L. ., Kone, M. ., & Traore, A. L. . (2024). SÉCURITÉ OU DÉVELOPPEMENT ? : Un dilemme budgétaire dans le contexte des élections de 2024 et de la pression internationale. Revue Française d’Economie Et De Gestion, 5(1). Consulté à l’adresse https://www.revuefreg.fr/index.php/home/article/view/1441
31. Sissoko, E. F., & Dembele, K. . (2023). Analyse des conséquences des sanctions économiques de la CEDEAO en 2022 : Examens de l’endettement et de la stabilité macroéconomique du Mali. Revue Française d’Economie Et De Gestion, 4(12). Consulté à l’adresse https://www.revuefreg.fr/index.php/home/article/view/1390
32. Sissoko, E. F. . (2025). Insécurité, sanctions économiques et défis budgétaires au Mali : Quelles stratégies pour une croissance économique soutenable (1991–2025) ?. Revue Française d’Economie Et De Gestion, 6(6). Consulté à l’adresse https://www.revuefreg.fr/index.php/home/article/view/2167
33. Sissoko, E. F., & Dembele, K. (2026). Réingénierie de la loi de finances en contextes de fragilité étatique : Vers un cadre de « Loi de Finances Résiliente » Le projet de loi de finances 2026 du Mali comme cas-laboratoire analytique. Revue Française d'Économie et de Gestion, 7(2).
34. Williams, M. (2010). Government cash management: Its interaction with other financial policies. International Monetary Fund.
35. World Bank. (2013). Beyond the annual budget: Global experience with medium-term expenditure frameworks. World Bank.
36. World Bank. (2017). World development report 2017: Governance and the law. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0950-7