Authors : Seth Mbonimpa; Jean Claude Ngenzi; Daniel Hatungimana; Samuel Rudahinyuka; Legrand Cirimwami

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 2 - February

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3hxtwp76

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/4z7c8y9t

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26feb1156

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : In Burundi, the construction sector is characterized by the presence of highly skilled human capital. However, the sector is also marked by inefficient resource management, with construction waste being perceived as an unavoidable problem rather than a potential source of profit. In view of this observation, the present study assesses the financial impact of these losses in Bujumbura, Burundi's economic capital, with a view to identifying operational levers that can transform this constraint into an opportunity for profitability. The research is grounded in a mixed methodology, integrating a perception survey of 47 professionals within the sector and in-depth audits of 11 construction sites overseen by seasoned executives. The findings of the data analysis suggest a phenomenon that can be termed the "expert paradox": despite the fact that 90% of site managers are seasoned engineers, the reality on the ground demonstrates a persistent managerial deficiency. Indeed, the findings of the audit revealed that 91% of the sites had no formal waste management system in place, and 82% lacked documentation to track actual consumption. This disorganization has been shown to result in considerable financial losses, with material losses estimated at between 5% and 20% of the total project budget, primarily attributable to a paucity of daily supervision and operational rigour. In conclusion, the study demonstrates that waste minimization is not a challenge of technical competence, but of site governance. The principal contribution of this study is to demonstrate the necessity of transitioning to a culture of traceability and systematic control. The replacement of current informal practices with rigorous management strategies is a potential catalyst for transformation of waste into a strategic investment for construction companies in Burundi. This, in turn, can ensure their overall performance and economic viability

Keywords : The Following Themes are to be Considered: Construction Waste, Economic Impact, Construction Sites, Sustainable Practices and Waste Minimization.

References :

1. W. S. Alaloul, M. A. Musarat, M. B. A. Rabbani, Q. Iqbal, A. Maqsoom, et W. Farooq, « Construction Sector Contribution to Economic Stability: Malaysian GDP Distribution », Sustainability, vol. 13, no 9, Art. no 9, janv. 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13095012.
2. B. Torgautov, A. Zhanabayev, A. Tleuken, A. Turkyilmaz, M. Mustafa, et F. Karaca, « Circular Economy: Challenges and Opportunities in the Construction Sector of Kazakhstan », Buildings, vol. 11, no 11, Art. no 11, nov. 2021, doi: 10.3390/buildings11110501.
3. S. Tafesse, Y. E. Girma, et E. Dessalegn, « Analysis of the socio-economic and environmental impacts of construction waste and management practices », Heliyon, vol. 8, no 3, p. e09169, mars 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon. 2022.e09169.
4. M. Santamouris et K. Vasilakopoulou, « Present and future energy consumption of buildings: Challenges and opportunities towards decarbonisation », E-Prime - Adv. Electr. Eng. Electron. Energy, vol. 1, p. 100002, janv. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.prime.2021.100002.
5. I. M. C. S. Illankoon et W. Lu, « Cost implications of obtaining construction waste management-related credits in green building », Waste Manag., vol. 102, p. 722‑731, févr. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.11.024.
6. W. Lu, J. Lou, C. Webster, F. Xue, Z. Bao, et B. Chi, « Estimating construction waste generation in the Greater Bay Area, China using machine learning », Waste Manag., vol. 134, p. 78‑88, oct. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.08.012.
7. O. N. Kopsidas et S. D. V. Giakoumatos, « Economics of Recycling and Recovery », Nat. Resour., vol. 12, no 4, Art. no 4, avr. 2021, doi: 10.4236/nr.2021.124007.
8. K. Rybak-Niedziółka et al., « Use of Waste Building Materials in Architecture and Urban Planning—A Review of Selected Examples », Sustainability, vol. 15, no 6, Art. no 6, janv. 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15065047.
9. M. Yeheyis, K. Hewage, M. S. Alam, C. Eskicioglu, et R. Sadiq, « An overview of construction and demolition waste management in Canada: a lifecycle analysis approach to sustainability », Clean Technol. Environ. Policy, vol. 15, no 1, p. 81‑91, févr. 2013, doi: 10.1007/s10098-012-0481-6.
10. B. G. Mujtaba et T. Senathip, « Layoffs and Downsizing Implications for the Leadership Role of Human Resources », J. Serv. Sci. Manag., vol. 13, no 2, Art. no 2, mars 2020, doi: 10.4236/jssm.2020.132014.
11. S. Ghafoor, S. Shooshtarian, N. Udawatta, A. Gurmu, G. Karunasena, et T. Maqsood, « Cost factors affecting the utilisation of secondary materials in the construction sector: A systematic literature review », Resour. Conserv. Recycl. Adv., vol. 23, p. 200230, nov. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.rcradv.2024.200230.
12. X. Wang, « Groundless Research Published on the International Journal of Plant Sciences », Voice Publ., vol. 06, no 04, p. 167‑169, 2020, doi: 10.4236/vp.2020.64020.
13. S. Dodampegama, L. Hou, E. Asadi, G. Zhang, et S. Setunge, « Revolutionizing construction and demolition waste sorting: Insights from artificial intelligence and robotic applications », Resour. Conserv. Recycl., vol. 202, p. 107375, mars 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107375.
14. A. Nikakhtar, A. A. Hosseini, K. Y. Wong, et A. Zavichi, « Application of lean construction principles to reduce construction process waste using computer simulation: a case study », Int. J. Serv. Oper. Manag., vol. 20, no 4, p. 461, 2015, doi: 10.1504/IJSOM.2015.068528.
15. C. K. Purchase et al., « Circular Economy of Construction and Demolition Waste: A Literature Review on Lessons, Challenges, and Benefits », Materials, vol. 15, no 1, p. 76, déc. 2021, doi: 10.3390/ma15010076.
16. R. G. Anuardo, M. Espuny, A. C. F. Costa, et O. J. Oliveira, « Toward a cleaner and more sustainable world: A framework to develop and improve waste management through organizations, governments and academia », Heliyon, vol. 8, no 4, p. e09225, avr. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon. 2022.e09225.
17. A. Akhtar et A. K. Sarmah, « Construction and demolition waste generation and properties of recycled aggregate concrete: A global perspective », J. Clean. Prod., vol. 186, p. 262‑281, juin 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.085.
18. L. Chen et al., « Conversion of waste into sustainable construction materials: A review of recent developments and prospects », Mater. Today Sustain., vol. 27, p. 100930, sept. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.mtsust.2024.100930.
19. I.-E. Gherman et al., « Circularity Outlines in the Construction and Demolition Waste Management: A Literature Review », Recycling, vol. 8, no 5, Art. no 5, oct. 2023, doi: 10.3390/recycling8050069.
20. C. Luangcharoenrat, S. Intrachooto, V. Peansupap, et W. Sutthinarakorn, « Factors Influencing Construction Waste Generation in Building Construction: Thailand’s Perspective », Sustainability, vol. 11, no 13, Art. no 13, janv. 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11133638.
21. Filler, « 34 Types of Construction Waste to Include in your SWMP », Landfill Today. Consulté le: 29 décembre 2024. [En ligne]. Disponible sur: https://landfill-site.com/34-types-of-construction-waste/
22. S. S. Rahman, S. Siddiqua, et C. Cherian, « Sustainable applications of textile waste fiber in the construction and geotechnical industries: A retrospect », Clean. Eng. Technol., vol. 6, p. 100420, févr. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.clet.2022.100420.
23. M. Białko, B. Hoła, M. Topolski, et Z. Woźniak, « Waste Reduction Methods Used in Construction Companies with Regards to Selected Building Products », Appl. Sci., vol. 12, no 11, Art. no 11, janv. 2022, doi: 10.3390/app12115387.
24. O. US EPA, « Sustainable Management of Construction and Demolition Materials ». Consulté le: 29 décembre 2024. [En ligne]. Disponible sur: https://www.epa.gov/smm/sustainable-management-construction-and-demolition-materials
25. AMICUS, « Cost-Cutting Tips for Construction Waste Management | AMICUS », AMICUS Chemical Solutions. Consulté le: 22 février 2025. [En ligne]. Disponible sur: https://amicuscdp.com/effective-cost-reduction-in-construction-waste-management/
26. Z. Zhang et al., « Municipal solid waste management challenges in developing regions: A comprehensive review and future perspectives for Asia and Africa », Sci. Total Environ., vol. 930, p. 172794, juin 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172794.
27. E. C. Eze, « Labour–Specific Factors Influencing the Volume of Construction Waste Generation in the Construction Industry », J. Proj. Manag. Pract., déc. 2021, Consulté le: 31 décembre 2024. [En ligne]. Disponible sur: https://www.academia.edu/94333053/Labour_Specific_Factors_Influencing_the_Volume_of_Construction_Waste_Generation_in_the_Construction_Industry
28. M. A. Memon, H. Ting, J.-H. Cheah, R. Thurasamy, F. Chuah, et T. H. Cham, « Sample Size for Survey Research: Review and Recommendations », in Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, juin 2020, p. i‑xx. doi: 10.47263/JASEM.4(2)01.
29. M. Husnain et A. Toor, « The Impact of Social Network Marketing on Consumer Purchase Intention in Pakistan: Consumer Engagement as a Mediator », Asian J. Bus. Account., juin 2017, Consulté le: 16 décembre 2024. [En ligne]. Disponible sur: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Impact-of-Social-Network-Marketing-on-Consumer-Husnain-Toor/61d0e648a5fa538f3a6ebb53615ef9c89fe64e35
30. X. Zhao, « Stakeholder-Associated Factors Influencing Construction and Demolition Waste Management: A Systematic Review », Buildings, vol. 11, no 4, Art. no 4, avr. 2021, doi: 10.3390/buildings11040149.
31. A. O. Daoud, M. El Hefnawy, et H. Wefki, « Investigation of critical factors affecting cost overruns and delays in Egyptian mega construction projects », Alex. Eng. J., vol. 83, p. 326‑334, nov. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2023.10.052.
32. P. Ghisellini, M. Ripa, et S. Ulgiati, « Exploring environmental and economic costs and benefits of a circular economy approach to the construction and demolition sector. A literature review », J. Clean. Prod., vol. 178, p. 618‑643, mars 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.207.
33. L. A. Akanbi et al., « Salvaging building materials in a circular economy: A BIM-based whole-life performance estimator », Resour. Conserv. Recycl., vol. 129, p. 175‑186, févr. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.026.
34. G. D’Amico, R. Arbolino, L. Shi, T. Yigitcanlar, et G. Ioppolo, « Digital Technologies for Urban Metabolism Efficiency: Lessons from Urban Agenda Partnership on Circular Economy », Sustainability, vol. 13, no 11, p. 6043, janv. 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13116043.
35. G. L. F. Benachio, M. do C. D. Freitas, et S. F. Tavares, « Circular economy in the construction industry: A systematic literature review », J. Clean. Prod., vol. 260, p. 121046, juill. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121046.
36. Md. U. Hossain, S. T. Ng, P. Antwi-Afari, et B. Amor, « Circular economy and the construction industry: Existing trends, challenges and prospective framework for sustainable construction », Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 130, p. 109948, sept. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109948.
37. M. Norouzi, M. Chàfer, L. F. Cabeza, L. Jiménez, et D. Boer, « Circular economy in the building and construction sector: A scientific evolution analysis », J. Build. Eng., vol. 44, p. 102704, déc. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102704.
38. K. Kabirifar, M. Mojtahedi, C. Wang, et V. W. Y. Tam, « Construction and demolition waste management contributing factors coupled with reduce, reuse, and recycle strategies for effective waste management: A review », J. Clean. Prod., vol. 263, p. 121265, août 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121265.
39. O. I. Olanrewaju, A. F. Kineber, N. Chileshe, et D. J. Edwards, « Modelling the relationship between Building Information Modelling (BIM) implementation barriers, usage and awareness on building project lifecycle », Build. Environ., vol. 207, p. 108556, janv. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108556.
40. M. Umar, S. A. R. Khan, M. Yusoff Yusliza, S. Ali, et Z. Yu, « Industry 4.0 and green supply chain practices: an empirical study », Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag., vol. 71, no 3, p. 814‑832, juin 2021, doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-12-2020-0633.
41. W. Xie, B. Deng, Y. Yin, X. Lv, et Z. Deng, « Critical Factors Influencing Cost Overrun in Construction Projects: A Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation », Buildings, vol. 12, no 11, p. 2028, nov. 2022, doi: 10.3390/buildings12112028.
42. S. Nagapan, I. Abdul Rahman, A. Asmi, A. Memon, et R. Mohamad zin, « Identifying Causes of Construction Waste -Case of Central Region of Peninsula Malaysia », Int. J. Integr. Eng., vol. 4, p. 22‑28, août 2012.
43. C. Formoso, L. Soibelman, C. De Cesare, et E. Isatto, « Material Waste in Building Industry: Main Causes and Prevention », J. Constr. Eng. Manag. -Asce - J CONSTR ENG MANAGE-ASCE, vol. 128, août 2002, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:4(316).
44. M. K. C. S. Wijewickrama, N. Chileshe, R. Rameezdeen, et J. J. Ochoa, « Minimizing Macro-Level Uncertainties for Quality Assurance in Reverse Logistics Supply Chains of Demolition Waste », Sustainability, vol. 13, no 23, p. 13069, janv. 2021, doi: 10.3390/su132313069.
45. M. A. Musarat, A. Sadiq, W. S. Alaloul, et M. M. Abdul Wahab, « A Systematic Review on Enhancement in Quality of Life through Digitalization in the Construction Industry », Sustainability, vol. 15, no 1, p. 202, janv. 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15010202.