Understanding and Misconceptions of Sedentary Behaviour Among University Students: Implications for Global Public Health


Authors : Abayol, P. N.; Gbaa, Z. L.; Ojo, B. A.

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 10 - October


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3maj74rd

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/bdhdrr75

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25oct1451

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.


Abstract : Background: Sedentary behaviour has emerged as a growing public health concern among young adults, particularly university students, due to its association with multiple adverse health outcomes, including obesity, cardiovascular disease, and mental health challenges. Despite increasing awareness globally, misconceptions and inadequate knowledge about sedentary behaviour persist among students in higher education settings.  Aim: To assess the knowledge and perception of the health outcomes of sedentary behaviour among students at the University of Salford, Manchester.  Methodology: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted using a quantitative research design. Data were collected through an online self-administered questionnaire distributed via the JISC platform. A total of 104 participants were recruited using convenience sampling from different schools and levels of study. The survey evaluated participant demographics, sedentary behaviour knowledge, and related health consequences. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests to determine associations between variables.  Results: Findings revealed moderate knowledge of sedentary behaviour among students, with significant misconceptions regarding its definition and health risks. Fewer respondents were aware that extended sitting is a risk factor for disease in and of itself, even though the majority acknowledged the negative effects of physical inactivity. Knowledge varied across academic disciplines, with health-related students demonstrating higher awareness levels.  Discussion: The results align with global and European studies indicating persistent knowledge gaps about sedentary behaviour among university populations. Similar findings have been observed in studies from the United Kingdom and continental Europe, suggesting the need for targeted educational interventions and university-level health promotion strategies to address misconceptions and encourage behavioural change.  Conclusion: Although students demonstrate partial awareness of sedentary behaviour and its health effects, substantial gaps remain in understanding its independent health risks. Universities should prioritise targeted awareness campaigns, integrate sedentary behaviour education into curricula, and create supportive environments to reduce sitting time.

Keywords : Cross-Sectional Study, Health Outcomes, Knowledge, Perception, Physical Activity, Public Health, Sedentary Behavior, United Kingdom, University Students, University of Salford.

References :

  1. Barbosa, B. C. R., Rocha, S. V., Santos, C. A. T., Pinto, M. S., & Oliveira, D. S. (2024). Sedentary behavior is associated with the mental health of university students during the COVID-19 pandemic, and not practicing physical activity accentuates its adverse effects: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 24(1), 1772. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-1772-3
  2. Castro, O., Bennie, J., Vergeer, I., Bosselut, G., & Biddle, S. J. H. (2020). How sedentary are university students? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prevention Science, 21(3), 332–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-020-01093-8
  3. Dunstan, D. W., Dogra, S., Carter, S. E., & Owen, N. (2021). Sit less and move more for cardiovascular health: Emerging insights and opportunities. Nature Reviews Cardiology, 18(10), 637–648. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-021-00564-9
  4. Edwardson, C. L., Rowlands, A. V., Gorely, T., Davies, M. J., Khunti, K., & Yates, T. (2018). Accuracy of posture allocation algorithms for thigh-worn accelerometers. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 50(7), 1425–1430. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001564
  5. Edelmann, D., Brand, R., Kohl, M., & Bös, K. (2022). Physical activity and sedentary behavior in university students: The role of gender, age, field of study, targeted degree, and study semester. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 819565. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.819565
  6. Ekelund, U., Tarp, J., Steene-Johannessen, J., Hansen, B. H., Jefferis, B., Fagerland, M. W., et al. (2019). Dose-response associations between accelerometry-measured physical activity and sedentary time and all-cause mortality: Systematic review and harmonised meta-analysis. BMJ, 366, l4570. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4570
  7. Owen, N., Healy, G. N., Matthews, C. E., & Dunstan, D. W. (2020). Too much sitting: The population health science of sedentary behavior. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 48(2), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1249/JES.0000000000000221
  8. Roberts, C. J., Ryan, D. J., Campbell, J., & Hardwicke, J. (2024). Self-reported physical activity and sedentary behaviour amongst UK university students: A cross-sectional case study. Critical Public Health. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2024.2338182
  9. Rosenberger, M. E., Fulton, J. E., Buman, M. P., Troiano, R. P., Grandner, M. A., & Buchner, D. M. (2020). The 24-hour activity cycle: A new paradigm for physical activity. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 52(12), 2561–2570. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000002381
  10. Tremblay, M. S., Aubert, S., Barnes, J. D., Saunders, T. J., Carson, V., Latimer-Cheung, A. E., et al. (2017). Sedentary Behaviour Research Network (SBRN)—Terminology Consensus Project process and outcome. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 14(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0525-8
  11. Wood, H. C., Prabhakar, S., Upsher, R., Duncan, M., Dommett, E. J., & Gardner, B. (2024). Understanding university students’ experiences of sitting while studying at home: A qualitative study. PLOS ONE, 19(12), e0314768. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314768
  12. World Health Organization. (2020). WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  13. Babaeer, L., Stylianou, M., Leveritt, M., & Gomersall, S. (2022). Physical activity, sedentary behaviour and educational outcomes in university students: A systematic review. Journal of American College Health, 70(7), 2184–2209. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2020.1842420
  14. Brown, C. E. B., Kelly, P., Niven, A., & Matthews, C. E. (2024). Key influences on university students' physical activity and sedentary behaviour: A systematic mapping and synthesis. BMC Public Health, 24, 1452. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-1452-1
  15. Castro, O., Bennie, J., Vergeer, I., Bosselut, G., & Biddle, S. J. H. (2020). How sedentary are university students? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prevention Science, 21(3), 332–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-020-01093-8
  16. Chaput, J.-P., Carson, V., Bull, F. C., Bauman, A., & Tremblay, M. S. (2020). WHO 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour: Summary and implications. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 17(1), 141. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-020-01037-3
  17. Carpenter, C., Badrov, M. B., Gurd, B. J., & Ditor, D. S. (2021). A comparison of sedentary behaviour as measured by self-report and accelerometry in university students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(8), 3914. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18083914
  18. Daniels, B. T., Legrand, S., Galland, B. C., & Olds, T. S. (2024). Changes in physical activity and sleep following the COVID-19 pandemic: Device-based comparisons. Sleep & Digital Health Reports, 3, 100053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.slah.2024.100053
  19. Dunstan, D. W., Dogra, S., Carter, S. E., & Owen, N. (2021). Sit less and move more for cardiovascular health: Emerging insights and opportunities. Nature Reviews Cardiology, 18(10), 637–648. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-021-00564-9
  20. Edelmann, D., Brand, R., Kohl, M., & Bös, K. (2022). Physical activity and sedentary behavior in university students: The role of gender, age, field of study, targeted degree, and study semester. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 821703. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.821703
  21. Ekelund, U., Tarp, J., Steene-Johannessen, J., Hansen, B. H., Jefferis, B., Fagerland, M. W., et al. (2019). Dose-response associations between accelerometry-measured physical activity and sedentary time and all-cause mortality: Harmonised meta-analysis. BMJ, 366, l4570. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4570
  22. Edwardson, C. L., Rowlands, A. V., Gorely, T., Davies, M. J., Khunti, K., & Yates, T. (2018). Accuracy of posture allocation algorithms for thigh-worn accelerometers. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 50(7), 1425–1430. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001564
  23. Hermassi, S., Hayes, L. D., Schwesig, R., & Bouhafs, E. (2021). Physical activity, sedentary behavior, and satisfaction with life in university students during COVID-19 lockdown. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 639251. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.639251
  24. Heller, S., Hoffmann, S. W., Burchartz, A., & Woll, A. (2023). Sedentary time of university students before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(3), 2301. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032301
  25. Hoffmann, S. W., Heller, S., & Woll, A. (2025). Prevalence and correlates of self-reported and accelerometer-determined sedentary behavior and physical activity among German university students. International Journal of Public Health, 70, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2025.003
  26. Kellner, M., Ewald, A., & Schmidt, M. (2023). A randomized controlled trial of a 6-week messenger-based intervention to reduce sedentary behavior in university students. International Journal of Public Health Research, 13, 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijphres13010034
  27. MacDonald, E. E., Sinclair, R. R., & Swanson, N. G. (2023). Sit-to-stand desk converters decrease self-reported sedentary time: Evidence from student and office worker trials. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 65(7), e413–e420. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002715
  28. Park, J. H., Moon, J. H., Kim, H. J., Kong, M. H., & Oh, Y. H. (2020). Sedentary lifestyle: Overview of updated evidence for health consequences and public health recommendations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), 8480. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218480
  29. Runacres, A., Mackintosh, K. A., Knight, R. L., Sheeran, L., Thatcher, R., & Shelley, J. (2021). The impact and perceptions of increased sedentary time during COVID-19: Associations with mental health. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 1202. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11284-3
  30. Roberts, C. J., Ryan, D. J., Campbell, J., & Hardwicke, J. (2024). Self-reported physical activity and sedentary behaviour amongst UK university students: A cross-sectional case study. Critical Public Health. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2024.2338182
  31. Rosenberger, M. E., Fulton, J. E., Buman, M. P., Troiano, R. P., Grandner, M. A., & Buchner, D. M. (2020). The 24-hour activity cycle: A new paradigm for physical activity research. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 52(12), 2561–2570. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000002381
  32. Savage, M. J., Drake, R. J., & James, D. V. B. (2024). Determinants of physical activity and sedentary behaviour in university students: Longitudinal evidence. BMC Public Health, 24, 563. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-0563-9
  33. Subirón-Valera, A. B., García-Ruiz, M. E., & Herrero, J. A. (2023). Linking sedentary behavior and mental distress in higher education students. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1204893. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1204893
  34. Visier-Alfonso, M. E., Roldán, M., & López-Bueno, R. (2025). The impact and perceptions of standing desk interventions in university settings: A scoping review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 22(1), 555. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22010555
  35. Wood, H. C., Prabhakar, S., Upsher, R., Duncan, M., Dommett, E. J., & Gardner, B. (2024). Understanding university students’ experiences of sitting while studying at home: A qualitative study. PLoS ONE, 19(12), e0314768. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314768
  36. World Health Organization. (2020). WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Geneva: World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240015128

Background: Sedentary behaviour has emerged as a growing public health concern among young adults, particularly university students, due to its association with multiple adverse health outcomes, including obesity, cardiovascular disease, and mental health challenges. Despite increasing awareness globally, misconceptions and inadequate knowledge about sedentary behaviour persist among students in higher education settings.  Aim: To assess the knowledge and perception of the health outcomes of sedentary behaviour among students at the University of Salford, Manchester.  Methodology: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted using a quantitative research design. Data were collected through an online self-administered questionnaire distributed via the JISC platform. A total of 104 participants were recruited using convenience sampling from different schools and levels of study. The survey evaluated participant demographics, sedentary behaviour knowledge, and related health consequences. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests to determine associations between variables.  Results: Findings revealed moderate knowledge of sedentary behaviour among students, with significant misconceptions regarding its definition and health risks. Fewer respondents were aware that extended sitting is a risk factor for disease in and of itself, even though the majority acknowledged the negative effects of physical inactivity. Knowledge varied across academic disciplines, with health-related students demonstrating higher awareness levels.  Discussion: The results align with global and European studies indicating persistent knowledge gaps about sedentary behaviour among university populations. Similar findings have been observed in studies from the United Kingdom and continental Europe, suggesting the need for targeted educational interventions and university-level health promotion strategies to address misconceptions and encourage behavioural change.  Conclusion: Although students demonstrate partial awareness of sedentary behaviour and its health effects, substantial gaps remain in understanding its independent health risks. Universities should prioritise targeted awareness campaigns, integrate sedentary behaviour education into curricula, and create supportive environments to reduce sitting time.

Keywords : Cross-Sectional Study, Health Outcomes, Knowledge, Perception, Physical Activity, Public Health, Sedentary Behavior, United Kingdom, University Students, University of Salford.

CALL FOR PAPERS


Paper Submission Last Date
31 - December - 2025

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe