Authors :
Abayol, P. N.; Gbaa, Z. L.; Ojo, B. A.
Volume/Issue :
Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 10 - October
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/3maj74rd
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/bdhdrr75
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25oct1451
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.
Abstract :
Background:
Sedentary behaviour has emerged as a growing public health concern among young adults, particularly university
students, due to its association with multiple adverse health outcomes, including obesity, cardiovascular disease, and mental
health challenges. Despite increasing awareness globally, misconceptions and inadequate knowledge about sedentary
behaviour persist among students in higher education settings.
Aim:
To assess the knowledge and perception of the health outcomes of sedentary behaviour among students at the University
of Salford, Manchester.
Methodology:
A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted using a quantitative research design. Data were collected through an
online self-administered questionnaire distributed via the JISC platform. A total of 104 participants were recruited using
convenience sampling from different schools and levels of study. The survey evaluated participant demographics, sedentary
behaviour knowledge, and related health consequences. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests
to determine associations between variables.
Results:
Findings revealed moderate knowledge of sedentary behaviour among students, with significant misconceptions
regarding its definition and health risks. Fewer respondents were aware that extended sitting is a risk factor for disease in
and of itself, even though the majority acknowledged the negative effects of physical inactivity. Knowledge varied across
academic disciplines, with health-related students demonstrating higher awareness levels.
Discussion:
The results align with global and European studies indicating persistent knowledge gaps about sedentary behaviour
among university populations. Similar findings have been observed in studies from the United Kingdom and continental
Europe, suggesting the need for targeted educational interventions and university-level health promotion strategies to
address misconceptions and encourage behavioural change.
Conclusion:
Although students demonstrate partial awareness of sedentary behaviour and its health effects, substantial gaps remain
in understanding its independent health risks. Universities should prioritise targeted awareness campaigns, integrate
sedentary behaviour education into curricula, and create supportive environments to reduce sitting time.
Keywords :
Cross-Sectional Study, Health Outcomes, Knowledge, Perception, Physical Activity, Public Health, Sedentary Behavior, United Kingdom, University Students, University of Salford.
References :
- Barbosa, B. C. R., Rocha, S. V., Santos, C. A. T., Pinto, M. S., & Oliveira, D. S. (2024). Sedentary behavior is associated with the mental health of university students during the COVID-19 pandemic, and not practicing physical activity accentuates its adverse effects: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 24(1), 1772. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-1772-3
- Castro, O., Bennie, J., Vergeer, I., Bosselut, G., & Biddle, S. J. H. (2020). How sedentary are university students? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prevention Science, 21(3), 332–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-020-01093-8
- Dunstan, D. W., Dogra, S., Carter, S. E., & Owen, N. (2021). Sit less and move more for cardiovascular health: Emerging insights and opportunities. Nature Reviews Cardiology, 18(10), 637–648. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-021-00564-9
- Edwardson, C. L., Rowlands, A. V., Gorely, T., Davies, M. J., Khunti, K., & Yates, T. (2018). Accuracy of posture allocation algorithms for thigh-worn accelerometers. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 50(7), 1425–1430. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001564
- Edelmann, D., Brand, R., Kohl, M., & Bös, K. (2022). Physical activity and sedentary behavior in university students: The role of gender, age, field of study, targeted degree, and study semester. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 819565. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.819565
- Ekelund, U., Tarp, J., Steene-Johannessen, J., Hansen, B. H., Jefferis, B., Fagerland, M. W., et al. (2019). Dose-response associations between accelerometry-measured physical activity and sedentary time and all-cause mortality: Systematic review and harmonised meta-analysis. BMJ, 366, l4570. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4570
- Owen, N., Healy, G. N., Matthews, C. E., & Dunstan, D. W. (2020). Too much sitting: The population health science of sedentary behavior. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 48(2), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1249/JES.0000000000000221
- Roberts, C. J., Ryan, D. J., Campbell, J., & Hardwicke, J. (2024). Self-reported physical activity and sedentary behaviour amongst UK university students: A cross-sectional case study. Critical Public Health. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2024.2338182
- Rosenberger, M. E., Fulton, J. E., Buman, M. P., Troiano, R. P., Grandner, M. A., & Buchner, D. M. (2020). The 24-hour activity cycle: A new paradigm for physical activity. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 52(12), 2561–2570. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000002381
- Tremblay, M. S., Aubert, S., Barnes, J. D., Saunders, T. J., Carson, V., Latimer-Cheung, A. E., et al. (2017). Sedentary Behaviour Research Network (SBRN)—Terminology Consensus Project process and outcome. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 14(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0525-8
- Wood, H. C., Prabhakar, S., Upsher, R., Duncan, M., Dommett, E. J., & Gardner, B. (2024). Understanding university students’ experiences of sitting while studying at home: A qualitative study. PLOS ONE, 19(12), e0314768. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314768
- World Health Organization. (2020). WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Geneva: World Health Organization.
- Babaeer, L., Stylianou, M., Leveritt, M., & Gomersall, S. (2022). Physical activity, sedentary behaviour and educational outcomes in university students: A systematic review. Journal of American College Health, 70(7), 2184–2209. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2020.1842420
- Brown, C. E. B., Kelly, P., Niven, A., & Matthews, C. E. (2024). Key influences on university students' physical activity and sedentary behaviour: A systematic mapping and synthesis. BMC Public Health, 24, 1452. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-1452-1
- Castro, O., Bennie, J., Vergeer, I., Bosselut, G., & Biddle, S. J. H. (2020). How sedentary are university students? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prevention Science, 21(3), 332–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-020-01093-8
- Chaput, J.-P., Carson, V., Bull, F. C., Bauman, A., & Tremblay, M. S. (2020). WHO 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour: Summary and implications. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 17(1), 141. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-020-01037-3
- Carpenter, C., Badrov, M. B., Gurd, B. J., & Ditor, D. S. (2021). A comparison of sedentary behaviour as measured by self-report and accelerometry in university students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(8), 3914. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18083914
- Daniels, B. T., Legrand, S., Galland, B. C., & Olds, T. S. (2024). Changes in physical activity and sleep following the COVID-19 pandemic: Device-based comparisons. Sleep & Digital Health Reports, 3, 100053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.slah.2024.100053
- Dunstan, D. W., Dogra, S., Carter, S. E., & Owen, N. (2021). Sit less and move more for cardiovascular health: Emerging insights and opportunities. Nature Reviews Cardiology, 18(10), 637–648. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-021-00564-9
- Edelmann, D., Brand, R., Kohl, M., & Bös, K. (2022). Physical activity and sedentary behavior in university students: The role of gender, age, field of study, targeted degree, and study semester. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 821703. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.821703
- Ekelund, U., Tarp, J., Steene-Johannessen, J., Hansen, B. H., Jefferis, B., Fagerland, M. W., et al. (2019). Dose-response associations between accelerometry-measured physical activity and sedentary time and all-cause mortality: Harmonised meta-analysis. BMJ, 366, l4570. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4570
- Edwardson, C. L., Rowlands, A. V., Gorely, T., Davies, M. J., Khunti, K., & Yates, T. (2018). Accuracy of posture allocation algorithms for thigh-worn accelerometers. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 50(7), 1425–1430. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001564
- Hermassi, S., Hayes, L. D., Schwesig, R., & Bouhafs, E. (2021). Physical activity, sedentary behavior, and satisfaction with life in university students during COVID-19 lockdown. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 639251. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.639251
- Heller, S., Hoffmann, S. W., Burchartz, A., & Woll, A. (2023). Sedentary time of university students before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(3), 2301. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032301
- Hoffmann, S. W., Heller, S., & Woll, A. (2025). Prevalence and correlates of self-reported and accelerometer-determined sedentary behavior and physical activity among German university students. International Journal of Public Health, 70, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2025.003
- Kellner, M., Ewald, A., & Schmidt, M. (2023). A randomized controlled trial of a 6-week messenger-based intervention to reduce sedentary behavior in university students. International Journal of Public Health Research, 13, 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijphres13010034
- MacDonald, E. E., Sinclair, R. R., & Swanson, N. G. (2023). Sit-to-stand desk converters decrease self-reported sedentary time: Evidence from student and office worker trials. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 65(7), e413–e420. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002715
- Park, J. H., Moon, J. H., Kim, H. J., Kong, M. H., & Oh, Y. H. (2020). Sedentary lifestyle: Overview of updated evidence for health consequences and public health recommendations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), 8480. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218480
- Runacres, A., Mackintosh, K. A., Knight, R. L., Sheeran, L., Thatcher, R., & Shelley, J. (2021). The impact and perceptions of increased sedentary time during COVID-19: Associations with mental health. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 1202. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11284-3
- Roberts, C. J., Ryan, D. J., Campbell, J., & Hardwicke, J. (2024). Self-reported physical activity and sedentary behaviour amongst UK university students: A cross-sectional case study. Critical Public Health. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2024.2338182
- Rosenberger, M. E., Fulton, J. E., Buman, M. P., Troiano, R. P., Grandner, M. A., & Buchner, D. M. (2020). The 24-hour activity cycle: A new paradigm for physical activity research. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 52(12), 2561–2570. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000002381
- Savage, M. J., Drake, R. J., & James, D. V. B. (2024). Determinants of physical activity and sedentary behaviour in university students: Longitudinal evidence. BMC Public Health, 24, 563. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-0563-9
- Subirón-Valera, A. B., García-Ruiz, M. E., & Herrero, J. A. (2023). Linking sedentary behavior and mental distress in higher education students. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1204893. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1204893
- Visier-Alfonso, M. E., Roldán, M., & López-Bueno, R. (2025). The impact and perceptions of standing desk interventions in university settings: A scoping review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 22(1), 555. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22010555
- Wood, H. C., Prabhakar, S., Upsher, R., Duncan, M., Dommett, E. J., & Gardner, B. (2024). Understanding university students’ experiences of sitting while studying at home: A qualitative study. PLoS ONE, 19(12), e0314768. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314768
- World Health Organization. (2020). WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Geneva: World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240015128
Background:
Sedentary behaviour has emerged as a growing public health concern among young adults, particularly university
students, due to its association with multiple adverse health outcomes, including obesity, cardiovascular disease, and mental
health challenges. Despite increasing awareness globally, misconceptions and inadequate knowledge about sedentary
behaviour persist among students in higher education settings.
Aim:
To assess the knowledge and perception of the health outcomes of sedentary behaviour among students at the University
of Salford, Manchester.
Methodology:
A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted using a quantitative research design. Data were collected through an
online self-administered questionnaire distributed via the JISC platform. A total of 104 participants were recruited using
convenience sampling from different schools and levels of study. The survey evaluated participant demographics, sedentary
behaviour knowledge, and related health consequences. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests
to determine associations between variables.
Results:
Findings revealed moderate knowledge of sedentary behaviour among students, with significant misconceptions
regarding its definition and health risks. Fewer respondents were aware that extended sitting is a risk factor for disease in
and of itself, even though the majority acknowledged the negative effects of physical inactivity. Knowledge varied across
academic disciplines, with health-related students demonstrating higher awareness levels.
Discussion:
The results align with global and European studies indicating persistent knowledge gaps about sedentary behaviour
among university populations. Similar findings have been observed in studies from the United Kingdom and continental
Europe, suggesting the need for targeted educational interventions and university-level health promotion strategies to
address misconceptions and encourage behavioural change.
Conclusion:
Although students demonstrate partial awareness of sedentary behaviour and its health effects, substantial gaps remain
in understanding its independent health risks. Universities should prioritise targeted awareness campaigns, integrate
sedentary behaviour education into curricula, and create supportive environments to reduce sitting time.
Keywords :
Cross-Sectional Study, Health Outcomes, Knowledge, Perception, Physical Activity, Public Health, Sedentary Behavior, United Kingdom, University Students, University of Salford.