Authors : Cherylyn A. Jumag; Remigilda Gallardo

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 6 - June

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/2cf75b3w

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/zpseysu2

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUN527

Abstract : This qualitative research employs a phenomenological approach to unravel the experiences of Grade 1 teachers as they navigate the challenges, coping mechanisms, and insights associated with teaching literacy in the digital age. Utilizing in-depth interviews, the study captures the lived experiences of Grade 1 teachers. The phenomenological lens allows for an in-depth exploration of the challenges encountered, coping strategies employed, and the rich insights drawn from their day-to-day experiences in literacy instruction. The findings reveal a multifaceted landscape of challenges, including diverse learning styles, technology integration issues, and difficulties in assessing and evaluating young learners' literacy skills. Coping mechanisms range from personalized remedial sessions to embracing modern teaching technologies, showcasing the teachers' resilience and adaptability. The study uncovers profound insights, emphasizing the importance of setting clear objectives, fostering a love for literacy, encouraging varied activities, providing adequate intervention for learners with difficulties, and adapting to digital trends for effective teaching. Implications extend to education stakeholders. For officials and school heads, the study informs policy decisions and professional development initiatives. Teachers benefit from practical strategies and a reflective approach to teaching, while students experience a more engaging and supportive learning environment. Future researchers find a foundation for further investigations into teaching literacy in the digital age.

Keywords : Literacy Instruction, Grade 1 Teachers, Digital Age, Challenges, Coping Mechanisms, Educational Experiences.

References :

1. Armstrong, T., & Rayner, S. G. (2019). Young learners: The role of cognitive and developmental factors in their learning styles. Early Childhood Education Journal, 47(6), 773-780.
2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
3. Casilao, M. E., & Eclarino, M. A. (2018). The integration of technology in basic education in the Philippines. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 6(1), 19-25.
4. Cheng, Y., Liu, M., & Huang, R. (2021). The integration of digital technology in teaching young learners. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 24(1), 48-60.
5. Christensen, G., [et al.]. (2016). Impact of a digital literacy program on the reading and writing skills of young learners in kindergarten and first grade. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(4), 313-329. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2013.10782601
6. Christakis, D. A., Zimmerman, F. J., & Garrison, M. M. (2014). Effect of block play on language acquisition and attention in toddlers: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 168(10), 950-956.
7. Coiro, J., & Dobler, E. (2017). Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the internet. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(4), 469-486.
8. Coiro, J., & Dobler, E. (2017). Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the internet. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(4), 469-486.
9. Cook-Sather, A. (2016). Sound, presence, and power: “Student voice” in educational research and reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(4), 359-390.
10. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
11. Cummins, J. (2017). Teaching in multilingual classrooms: Challenges and opportunities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 37, 28-45.
12. Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2015). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. John Wiley & Sons.
13. Darling-Hammond, L., & Rothman, R. (2019). Teacher and leader learning in complex systems: Improving professional practice. Teachers College Press.
14. Dede, C. (2018). Theoretical perspectives influencing the use of information technology in teaching and learning. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 43-62). Springer.
15. Ellis, E. M., & Worthington, K. (2019). Parental involvement and child literacy development: A review. Early Child Development and Care, 189(3), 368-383. doi: 10.1080/03004430.2017.1376936
16. Epstein, J. L. (2021). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools. Westview Press.
17. Fisser, P., Voogt, J., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2018). Integration of information and communication technology in primary education: The value of teachers' knowledge and skills. Educational Media International, 55(3), 237-255.
18. Fullan, M. (2017). The new meaning of educational change. Teachers College Press.
19. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books.
20. Gopnik, A. (2016). The gardener and the carpenter: What the new science of child development tells us about the relationship between parents and children. Macmillan.
21. Guskey, T. R. (2022). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381-391.
22. Harasim, L. (2017). Learning theory and online technologies. Routledge.
23. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2022). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.
24. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2017). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
25. Hood, M., & Conlon, T. (2019). Enhancing the Literacy Skills of Young Children Using Technology: A Review of the Literature. Early Childhood Education Journal, 47(4), 433-444. doi: 10.1007/s10643-018-0934-4
26. Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., & Sandler, H. M. (2015). Final performance report for OERI grant #R305T010673, National Science Foundation. Vanderbilt University.
27. Justice, L. M., Logan, J. A., Kaderavek, J. N., Schmitt, M. B., Tompkins, V., & Bartlett, C. W. (2017). Emergent Literacy in Early Childhood Education. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 17(3), 281-292. doi: 10.1177/1468798416655210
28. Knezek, G., Christensen, R., Tyler-Wood, T., & Periathiruvadi, S. (2013). Impact of ICT-Powered Classroom on the Young Learner Literacy Development. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(4), 313-329. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2013.10782601
29. Krashen, S. (2014). The power of reading: Insights from the research. Libraries Unlimited.
30. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
31. Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., Castek, J., & Henry, L. A. (2023). New literacies: A dual-level theory of the changing nature of literacy, instruction, and assessment. In the Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 15-48). Routledge.
32. Liu, L., Liu, C., Lee, S., & Magjuka, R. J. (2010). Cultural differences in online learning: International student perceptions. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 177-188.
33. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2020). A theory of goal setting & task performance. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
34. Lucido, P. I. (2018). Technology integration in Philippine education: Current policies and practices. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 38(2), 129-139.
35. McKinney, P. (2017). Learning in the digital age: Put students at the center. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(4), 68-79.
36. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
37. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage publications.
38. Muijs, D., Harris, A., Chapman, C., & Stoll, L. (2019). Improving schools: Using what we know. Routledge.
39. Prensky, M. (2021). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
40. Sénéchal, M., & LeFevre, J. A. (2022). Parental involvement in the development of children's reading skill: A five‐year longitudinal study. Child Development, 73(2), 445-460.
41. Tomlinson, C. A. (2011). How to Differentiate Instruction in Mixed-Ability Classrooms. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
42. Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2019). Digital skills and social media use: How they affect our lives. Routledge.
43. van Manen, M. (2016). Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing. Routledge.
44. Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2020). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179-225. doi: 10.3102/0091732X09349791
45. Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2018). Understanding by design. ASCD.
46. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47. Zeichner, K., & Liston, D. (2017). Teaching student teachers to reflect. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 23-48.
48. Zhu, Z., Fan, Y., & Chen, Y. (2021). Creating a positive learning environment for primary school students: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 34, 100430.