Authors :
Unnatii Duggal
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 4 - April
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/2rfcrwrb
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/ynzp4nvy
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26apr1940
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
With the rapid integration of artificial intelligence into higher education, understanding its psychological
implications for students has become increasingly urgent. This study examined the influence of locus of control and ChatGPT
usage on emotional apathy among 170 individuals (aged 18 and above) using a correlational research design. Data were
collected using Rotter's Locus of Control Scale, the Apathy Evaluation Scale, and a ChatGPT Usage in Education Scale, and
analysed via Pearson correlation, independent samples t-test, and multiple linear regression. Results revealed a significant
negative correlation between ChatGPT usage and emotional apathy (r = −.315, p < .01), with ChatGPT usage emerging as a
significant predictor of lower apathy (β = −.318, p < .001). Contrary to expectation, locus of control did not significantly
predict emotional apathy. These findings challenge prevailing assumptions about AI-driven academic disengagement and
suggest that purposeful ChatGPT use may promote emotional engagement in educational contexts. Implications for
educators, institutions, and AI policy in higher education are discussed.
References :
- Abubakar, S., Jeilani, A., & Yusuf, M. (2025). The role of over-reliance on AI in the negative consequences of student learning: The moderating effects of ethical concerns and institutional policies. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2591503.
- Ang, Y.-S., Lockwood, P. L., Kienast, A., Plant, O., Drew, D., Slavkova, E., Tamm, M., & Husain, M. (2018). Differential impact of behavioral, social, and emotional apathy on Parkinson’s disease. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology.
- Biswas, M., & Murray, J. (2024). “Incomplete without tech”: Emotional responses and the psychology of AI reliance. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems (pp. 119–131). Springer Nature Switzerland.
- Cassidy, S., & Eachus, P. (2000). Learning style, academic belief systems, self-report student proficiency and academic achievement in higher education. Educational Psychology, 20(3), 307–322.
- Clarke, D. E., Van Reekum, R., Patel, J., Simard, M., Gomez, E., & Streiner, D. L. (2007). An appraisal of the psychometric properties of the Clinician version of the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES-C). International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 16(2), 97–110.
- Faruk, L. I. D., Rohan, R., Ninrutsirikun, U., & Pal, D. (2023). University students’ acceptance and usage of generative AI (ChatGPT) from a psycho-technical perspective. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Advances in Information Technology (IAIT ’23) (Article 15, pp. 1–8). Association for Computing Machinery.
- Firaina, R., & Sulisworo, D. (2023). Exploring the usage of ChatGPT in higher education: Frequency and impact on productivity. Buletin Edukasi Indonesia, 2(01), 39–46.
- Gaczek, P., Leszczyński, G., Kot, M., & Pozharliev, R. (2025). How locus of causality shapes human–AI decision-making. Management Decision, 63(13), 522–544.
- Gillies, A. (2025). Moderating role of locus of control on the relationship between self-efficacy and trust in AI (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University).
- Gonzalez-Garcia, A., Bermejo-Martinez, D., Lopez-Alonso, A. I., Trevisson-Redondo, B., Martín-Vázquez, C., & Perez-Gonzalez, S. (2025). Impact of ChatGPT usage on nursing students’ education: A cross-sectional study. Heliyon, 11(1).
- Guerrera, C. S., Platania, G. A., Varrasi, S., Sarti, P., Boccaccio, F. M., Torre, V., & Castellano, S. (2025). Investigating the multidimensional structure of apathy in cognitive decline: An exploratory network analysis of the Apathy Evaluation Scale. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry.
- Harlev, D., Ravona-Springer, R., Koren, O., Zorani, S., Plotnik, M., & Wolpe, N. (2025). Measuring apathy through computational lenses: Behavioral and physiological signatures of engagement in virtual reality. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry.
- Jain, M., & Singh, S. (2015). Locus of control and its relationship with mental health and adjustment among adolescent females. Journal of Mental Health and Human Behaviour, 20(1), 16–21.
- Jo, H. (2024). From concerns to benefits: A comprehensive study of ChatGPT usage in education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 35.
- Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274.
- Klarin, J., Hoff, E., Larsson, A., & Daukantaitė, D. (2024). Adolescents’ use and perceived usefulness of generative AI for schoolwork: Exploring their relationships with executive functioning and academic achievement. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7, 1415782.
- Lafond-Brina, G., & Bonnefond, A. (2025). Multidimensional apathy: A simple and inclusive clinical marker of youth mental health—A longitudinal study. medRxiv.
- Le Heron, C., Holroyd, C. B., Salamone, J., & Husain, M. (2019). Brain mechanisms underlying apathy. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 90(3), 302–312.
- Lockwood, P. L., Ang, Y.-S., Husain, M., & Crockett, M. J. (2017). Individual differences in empathy are associated with apathy-motivation. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 17293.
- Lowes, S., & Lin, P. (2015). Learning to learn online: Using locus of control to help students become successful online learners. Journal of Online Learning Research, 1(1), 17–48.
- Playfoot, D., Quigley, M., & Thomas, A. G. (2024). Hey ChatGPT, give me a title for a paper about degree apathy and student use of AI for assignment writing. The Internet and Higher Education, 62, 100950.
- Serin, N. B., Serin, O., & Şahin, F. S. (2010). Factors affecting the locus of control of the university students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 449–452.
- Taktak, M., & Bafralı, G. (2025). ChatGPT usage scale in education: Validity and reliability study. International Journal of Technology in Education, 8(1).
- Vargas-Murillo, A. R., De la Asuncion, I. N. M., & De Jesús Guevara-Soto, F. (2023). Challenges and opportunities of AI-assisted learning: A systematic literature review on the impact of ChatGPT usage in higher education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(7), 122–135.
- Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education—Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39.
With the rapid integration of artificial intelligence into higher education, understanding its psychological
implications for students has become increasingly urgent. This study examined the influence of locus of control and ChatGPT
usage on emotional apathy among 170 individuals (aged 18 and above) using a correlational research design. Data were
collected using Rotter's Locus of Control Scale, the Apathy Evaluation Scale, and a ChatGPT Usage in Education Scale, and
analysed via Pearson correlation, independent samples t-test, and multiple linear regression. Results revealed a significant
negative correlation between ChatGPT usage and emotional apathy (r = −.315, p < .01), with ChatGPT usage emerging as a
significant predictor of lower apathy (β = −.318, p < .001). Contrary to expectation, locus of control did not significantly
predict emotional apathy. These findings challenge prevailing assumptions about AI-driven academic disengagement and
suggest that purposeful ChatGPT use may promote emotional engagement in educational contexts. Implications for
educators, institutions, and AI policy in higher education are discussed.