Authors :
Dr. Keith Nester A. Lavin; Ernesto Jastia Jr.; Valerie De Guia; Dr. Emerson G. Aliswag; Dr. Mark Jheran Alvarez; Dr. Noel P. Ligaya; Dr. Irfan Hussain Khan; Dr. Dovie B. Ponciano
Volume/Issue :
Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 3 - March
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/bddu6xnh
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/4c2ejbjh
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25mar1012
Google Scholar
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Note : Google Scholar may take 15 to 20 days to display the article.
Abstract :
Using a qualitative meta-analysis approach, this study determined and establish evidence of face shield use as a
safety protocol. A systematic review of different research studies was done. The review aims to describe the current guidelines
of Inter Agency Task Force (IATF) on the use of face shield as a COVID – 19 safety protocol and to gather and examine
current research on the effectiveness of the use of face shield, compliance of the public and factors that affect the public’s
compliance on the effectiveness of the use of face shield and the negative effects on the use of face shield. Results shows that
based on several research studies and simulation. Face shield has lesser effectivity compared to other safety protocol measures
such as wearing of KN95 mask. This will also lead to accumulation of COVID – 19 aerosols that might be inhaled by the
person if improper mask was used. Another study also proved that face shield hampers communication. Therefore, wearing of
face shield should be voluntary. Hence, the government should focus on more important programs and policies such as
strengthening of the country’s response to the pandemic particularly in providing insurance to the majority and prioritizing
the health of the citizens in the government programs that will be implemented.
Keywords :
COVID 19, Face Shield, IATF, Meta – Analysis, Safety Protocol.
References :
- Akagi, F., Haraga, I., Inage, S. I., & Akiyoshi, K. (2020). Effect of sneezing on the flow around a face shield. Physics of Fluids, 32(12), 127105.
- Bandaru, S. V., Augustine, A. M., Lepcha, A., Sebastian, S., Gowri, M., Philip, A., & Mammen, M. D. (2020). The effects of N95 mask and face shield on speech perception among healthcare workers in the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic scenario. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology, 134(10), 895-898
- Chu, D. K., Akl, E. A., Duda, S., Solo, K., Yaacoub, S., Schünemann, H. J., ... & Reinap, M. (2020). Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The lancet, 395(10242), 1973-1987.
- Fortier-Bensen, T. (2020, July 1). CDC does not recommend wearing face shields to protect against COVID-19. WCIV. https://abcnews4.com/news/local/cdc-does-not-recommend-wearing-face-shields-to-combat-covid-19?fbclid=IwAR0-RTa76X4QkzsTrVUjorfF7zi8iSJQqBxbygafr3vZQ4H7u3-5DJNxOKg
- Interaksyon. (2020, December 18). Face shields mandated in Philippines: Do they really protect vs SARS-CoV-2? Interaksyon. https://interaksyon.philstar.com/trends-spotlights/2020/12/18/182231/face-shields-studies-science-philippines-coronavirus/
- J Cocal, C. (2021). Effectiveness of the Philippine Government’s Responses to COVID-19 Pandemic.
- Li, L., Niu, M., & Zhu, Y. (2020). Assessing the effectiveness of using various face coverings to mitigate the transport of airborne particles produced by coughing indoors. Aerosol Science and Technology, 55(3), 332-339.
- Muzzi, E., Chermaz, C., Castro, V., Zaninoni, M., Saksida, A., & Orzan, E. (2021). Short report on the effects of SARS-CoV-2 face protective equipment on verbal communication. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 1-6.
- Pan, J., Harb, C., Leng, W., & Marr, L. C. (2021). Inward and outward effectiveness of cloth masks, a surgical mask, and a face shield. Aerosol Science and Technology, 55(6), 718-733.
- Republic of the Philippines Inter – Agency Task Force for the management of emerging infectious diseases resolution no. 88 Series of 2020
- Republic of the Philippines Inter – Agency Task Force for the management of emerging infectious diseases resolution no. 149 Series of 2021
- Review sought for mandatory wearing of face shields in PH. (2021, June 9). RAPPLER. https://www.rappler.com/nation/review-sought-mandatory-wearing-face-shields-philippines/
- Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) situation report—4. Accessed December 18, 2020. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200423-sitrep-94-covid-19.pdf
- Coronavirus (COVID-19) events as they happen. Accessed December 18, 2020. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/events-as-they-happen
- Advice for the public. Accessed December 18, 2020. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/advice-for-public/
- World Health Organization (WHO) (2020) Rational Use of Personal Protective Equipment for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Interim Guidance, 6 April 2020, vol 2019. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/331695/WHO-2019-nCov-IPC_PPE_use-2020.3-eng.pdf
- Prata JC, Silva ALP, Walker TR, Duarte AC, Rocha-Santos T (2020) COVID-19 pandemic repercussions on the use and management of plastics. Environ Sci Technol 54(13):7760–7765. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02178
- COVID-19 has worsened the ocean plastic pollution problem—scientific american. Accessed December 18, 2020. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/covid-19-has-worsened-the-ocean-plastic-pollution-problem/
- Where did 5,500 tonnes of discarded face masks end up? Greenpeace International. Accessed December 18, 2020. https://www.greenpeace.org/international/story/44629/where-did-5500-tonnes-of-discarded-face-masks-end-up/
- Opération Mer Propre. https://www.operation-mer-propre.com/?fbclid=IwAR1PxiR7kQBXs-HeNdOJIyW4iQUIKM39_vxv_MK82a91JO9pphl39g5w3cg
- No shortage of masks at the beach—OCEANS ASIA. Accessed December 18, 2020. https://oceansasia.org/beach-mask-coronavirus/
- Shortage of personal protective equipment endangering health workers worldwide. Accessed December 18, 2020. https://www.who.int/news/item/03-03-2020-shortage-of-personal-protective-equipment-endangering-health-workers-worldwide
- COVID-19 Decontamination and Reuse of Filtering Facepiece Respirators|CDC. Accessed February 25, 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/ppe-strategy/decontamination-reuse-respirators.html
- Hart OE, Halden RU (2020) Computational analysis of SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 surveillance by wastewater-based epidemiology locally and globally: Feasibility, economy, opportunities and challenges. Sci Total Environ 730:138875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138875
- NIOSH guide to the selection and use of particulate respirators certified under 42 CFR 84 1996. https://doi.org/10.26616/NIOSHPUB96101
- Zhao M, Liao L, Xiao W et al (2020) Household materials selection for homemade cloth face coverings and their filtration efficiency enhancement with triboelectric charging. Nano Lett 20(7):5544–5552. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c02211
- Garrigou A, Laurent C, Berthet A et al (2020) Critical review of the role of PPE in the prevention of risks related to agricultural pesticide use. Saf Sci 123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104527
- Salimnia, H., Meyer, M. P., Mitchell, R., Fairfax, M. R., Gundel, A., Guru, N., & Chopra, T. (2021). A laboratory model demonstrating the protective effects of surgical masks, face shields, and a combination of both in a speaking simulation. American Journal of Infection Control, 49(4), 409-415.
- Singh, P., Pal, K., Chakravraty, A., & Ikram, S. (2021). Execution and viable applications of Face shield “a safeguard” against viral infections of cross-protection studies: A comprehensive review. Journal of Molecular Structure, 130443.
- Wendling, J. M., Fabacher, T., Pébaÿ, P. P., Cosperec, I., & Rochoy, M. (2021). Experimental efficacy of the face shield and the mask against emitted and potentially received particles. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 1942.
Using a qualitative meta-analysis approach, this study determined and establish evidence of face shield use as a
safety protocol. A systematic review of different research studies was done. The review aims to describe the current guidelines
of Inter Agency Task Force (IATF) on the use of face shield as a COVID – 19 safety protocol and to gather and examine
current research on the effectiveness of the use of face shield, compliance of the public and factors that affect the public’s
compliance on the effectiveness of the use of face shield and the negative effects on the use of face shield. Results shows that
based on several research studies and simulation. Face shield has lesser effectivity compared to other safety protocol measures
such as wearing of KN95 mask. This will also lead to accumulation of COVID – 19 aerosols that might be inhaled by the
person if improper mask was used. Another study also proved that face shield hampers communication. Therefore, wearing of
face shield should be voluntary. Hence, the government should focus on more important programs and policies such as
strengthening of the country’s response to the pandemic particularly in providing insurance to the majority and prioritizing
the health of the citizens in the government programs that will be implemented.
Keywords :
COVID 19, Face Shield, IATF, Meta – Analysis, Safety Protocol.