Authors :
Maria Gerle B. Lastimosa; Maedel Joy Ventura-Escote
Volume/Issue :
Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 7 - July
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/2p9pbbuk
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/2edx4rfw
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUL1338
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
This study aimed to investigate the impact and
effectiveness one-on-one tutoring and technology
integration in kindergarten educational settings through
a Quasi experimental research design; utilizing a pretest
and post-test for both control and experimental groups to
assess the effectivity of the treatment and two different
learning plans intended for experimental and control
group together with the Table of Specification (TOS) that
served as the research instrument for this study. The
subjects of the study were the Kindergarten Students
Section-Parrot of Mangga Elementary School. This class
has morning and afternoon shifts: the morning shift
served as the control group (A) and the afternoon served
as the experimental (B). There were 41 students in all,
with in the control group and in the experimental group.
Furthermore, the level of performance of the students
after the study of the two groups revealed that the
competency level of experimental group has the Very
Satisfactory level with 84% class proficiency while the
control group has 59% class proficiency: did not meet
expectation. The study's findings indicate that the
experimental group (Group B), which received
technology integration and one-on-one tutoring, showed
significantly higher improvement in class proficiency
compared to the control group (Group A), which followed
traditional learning methods. The study recommends that
schools should consider integrating technology
interventions and one-on-one tutoring into their
curriculum. The significant improvement observed in the
experimental group suggests that these methods
effectively enhance student learning outcomes.
Keywords :
Technology Integration, One-on-One Tutoring, Quasi-Experimental Research Design, Kindergarten Students, Experimental Group, Control Group.
References :
- Cole, R. A., Buchenroth-Martin, C., Weston, T. J., Devine, L., Myatt, J., Helding, B., Pradhan, S. S., McKeown, M. G., Messier, S., Borum, J., & Ward, W. H. (2018). One-on-one and small group conversations with an intelligent virtual science tutor. Computer Speech & Language, 50, 157–174.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2018.01.002
- Dixon, J., & Shen, L. (2019). Technology-Integrated curriculum and students’ academic performance. In Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series (pp. 96–131). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5519-3.ch005
- Fitzpatrick, C. (2017). Ready for Kindergarten: Are Intelligence Skills Enough?. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 7(1), 512.
- Magno, C. (2022). Planning for the learning recovery: The Philippine experience. CLAD Asia Bulletin, 4.
This study aimed to investigate the impact and
effectiveness one-on-one tutoring and technology
integration in kindergarten educational settings through
a Quasi experimental research design; utilizing a pretest
and post-test for both control and experimental groups to
assess the effectivity of the treatment and two different
learning plans intended for experimental and control
group together with the Table of Specification (TOS) that
served as the research instrument for this study. The
subjects of the study were the Kindergarten Students
Section-Parrot of Mangga Elementary School. This class
has morning and afternoon shifts: the morning shift
served as the control group (A) and the afternoon served
as the experimental (B). There were 41 students in all,
with in the control group and in the experimental group.
Furthermore, the level of performance of the students
after the study of the two groups revealed that the
competency level of experimental group has the Very
Satisfactory level with 84% class proficiency while the
control group has 59% class proficiency: did not meet
expectation. The study's findings indicate that the
experimental group (Group B), which received
technology integration and one-on-one tutoring, showed
significantly higher improvement in class proficiency
compared to the control group (Group A), which followed
traditional learning methods. The study recommends that
schools should consider integrating technology
interventions and one-on-one tutoring into their
curriculum. The significant improvement observed in the
experimental group suggests that these methods
effectively enhance student learning outcomes.
Keywords :
Technology Integration, One-on-One Tutoring, Quasi-Experimental Research Design, Kindergarten Students, Experimental Group, Control Group.