Authors : Annapurna A.; Nandinee Rao; Angelina Prateeka V.; Shiva Lakshmi J.

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 2 - February

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3mrtzk7c

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/bdyhuccw

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26feb1052

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : This study evaluates plant-based milks as sustainable alternatives to dairy, focusing on their sources, health benefits and sensory attributes. The functional characteristics of selected plant-based milks, including viscosity and bulk density were assessed to determine their suitability for food applications. Emerging alternatives such as potato milk and pea milk were highlighted for their nutritional potential, allergen-free nature and environmental sustainability. Potato milk produced by blending cooked potatoes with water requires fewer natural resources. And it is free from lactose, gluten, soy and nuts. Pea milk derived from cooked split peas is rich in plant-based protein, low in sugar when unsweetened and supports satiety, muscle repair and digestive tolerance. Overall, the favourable sensory and environmental attributes of plant-based milks indicate strong consumer acceptability and potential for wider incorporation into sustainable food systems.

Keywords : Plant-Based Milk, Dairy Alternatives, Potato Milk, Pea Milk.

References :

1. Casey, C. E., & Hambidge, K. M. (2007). Nutritional aspects of plant-based milk alternatives. Advances in Nutrition Research, 18, 235–256.
2. Chalupa-Krebsbach, S. (2018). Plant-based milk alternatives: Market trends and nutritional considerations. Food Technology Magazine, 72(5), 34–41.
3. Jeske, E. K., Zannini, E., & Arendt, E. K. (2017). Nutritional, physicochemical, and sensory evaluation of commercial plant-based milk substitutes. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 56, 26–33.
4. Mäkinen, O. E., Wanhalinna, V., Zannini, E., & Arendt, E. K. (2016). Foods for special dietary needs: Non-dairy plant-based milk substitutes and fermented dairy-type products. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 56(3), 339–349.
5. Pula, A. A. (2020). Plant-based milk alternatives: Composition, processing, and consumer acceptance. Journal of Food Science and Nutrition.
6. Sethi, S., Tyagi, S. K., & Anurag, R. K. (2016). Plant-based milk alternatives: An emerging segment of functional beverages. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 56(3), 339–349.
7. Tingyu, M., Muller, J., Bolten, C. J., & Wittmann, C. (2019). Fermentation of plant-based milk alternatives for improved flavour and nutritional quality. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 86, 492–500.
8. G. Zobel, R. Rodriguez-Sanchez, S.Y. Hea, A. Weatherall, R. Sargent, 2020 Validation of Brix refractometers and a hydrometer for measuring the quality of caprine colostrum, Journal of Dairy Science, Volume 103, Issue 10,  9277-9289, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-18165
9. Ostwald, W., & The Chairman. (1913). Colloids and their viscosity. A general discussion. Transactions of the Faraday Society, 9, 34-46.
10. Mesmer, R.E., Holmes, H.F. (1992). pH, Definition and measurement at high temperatures. Journal of  Solution Chem 21, 725–744
11. Setser, C. S. (1993). Sensory evaluation. In B. S. Kamel & C. E. Stauffer (Eds.), Advances in Baking Technology (pp. 254–291). Springer, Boston, M