Authors : Ashutosh Rajpoot; Dr. Pawan Kumar Singh

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 11 - November

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/34ebhzsc

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/2kwdsjw9

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25nov127

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.

Abstract : Water is vital not just for survival but also for upholding dignity, supporting livelihoods, and fostering social inclusion. Despite this, academic research on the global bottled water market—now worth $348 billion and rapidly expanding in India—seldom explores its potential role in promoting social justice. This study fills that gap by investigating the Kineer Water Industry, a social enterprise in India that combines bottled water distribution with inclusive employment opportunities for transgender individuals and other marginalized communities. Using secondary sources and comparative case analysis, the paper positions Kineer alongside global efforts like Jibu, JanaJal, WaterAid, and Global Grassroots, emphasizing its distinctive innovation: turning access to water into a pathway to dignity. Transgender people in India, who face significantly lower literacy and employment rates than the national average, are frequently pushed into informal and stigmatized jobs. Kineer challenges this exclusion by providing roles in bottling, logistics, and sales, redefining employment as a means of recognition, skill development, and social value. The findings highlight three key contributions: (1) using employment to promote dignity, (2) reducing stigma to drive community change, and (3) offering a scalable model for dignity-centered enterprises. Grounded in the Capability Approach and dignity-at-work theories, the study contributes to conversations on inclusive growth and the Sustainable Development Goals.

Keywords : Water; Dignity; Transgender Employment; Social Enterprise; Inclusive Development; Capability Approach.

References :

1. Badgett, M. V. L., Waaldijk, K., & Rodgers, Y. van der M. (2019). LGBTQ inclusion and economic development: An analysis of emerging economies. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1374-4
2. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
3. Carroll, A. B. (2016). Carroll’s pyramid of CSR: Taking another look. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 1(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-016-0004-6
4. Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2017). Fundamentals for an international typology of social enterprise models. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(6), 2469–2497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-017-9884-7
5. Hodson, R. (2001). Dignity at work. Cambridge University Press.
6. Jain, D. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and transgender employment in India. Journal of Business Ethics, 162(3), 533–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3990-1
7. McGranahan, G., Njiru, C., Albu, M., Smith, M., & Mitlin, D. (2016). Universalising water and sanitation coverage in urban areas: From global frameworks to local solutions. Global Policy, 7(2), 242–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12262
8. Meier, B. M., Kayser, G. L., Amjad, U. Q., & Bartram, J. (2014). Implementing an evolving human right through water and sanitation policy. Water Policy, 16(1), 120–140. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2013.021
9. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2019). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
10. Patel, S. (2016). Sanitation and social change: Sulabh International in India. Environment and Urbanization, 28(1), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247815618008
11. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1–2), 62–77.
12. Reddy, V. R., & Batchelor, C. (2012). Can water, sanitation and hygiene services support poverty reduction? Water Policy, 14(3), 453–469. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2011.174
13. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
14. Silver, H. (2015). The contexts of social inclusion. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
15. Sultana, F., & Loftus, A. (2020). Water politics: Governance, justice and the right to water. Routledge.
16. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations.
17. United Nations General Assembly. (2010). Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 28 July 2010: The human right to water and sanitation (A/RES/64/292). United Nations.
18. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

• Bibliography (Additional Sources Consulted)

19. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford University Press.
20. Chambers, R. (1997). Whose reality counts? Putting the first last. Intermediate Technology Publications.
21. Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Harvard University Press.
22. Sachs, J. D. (2015). The age of sustainable development. Columbia University Press.

• Webliography (Non-Academic Sources)

23. Financial Times. (2021). WaterAid’s solar-powered taps in Malawi: Dignity through time saved. https://ft.com
24. Global Grassroots. (2022). Women-led water ventures in Rwanda. https://globalgrassroots.org
25. Impact Entrepreneur. (2023). Jibu: Social franchising for water and dignity in East Africa. https://impactentrepreneur.com
26. Impact Startup Academy. (2022). JanaJal: Empowering India with Water ATMs. https://impactstartupacademy.com
27. Kineer India. (2023). Kineer: Restoring dignity through water and employment. https://kineer.in
28. The Guardian. (2020). Reviving indigenous wetland systems in Ecuador. https://theguardian.com
29. Wikipedia. (2024). Paani Project; Jibu; Isingiro Water Project. https://en.wikipedia.org