Authors : Pankaja Kumari Joshi

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 10 - October

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3hbdfy5s

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/5ymjtrpb

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24OCT506

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : The core claim of the capability approach is that assessments of the well-being or quality of life of a person, and judgements about justice, or the level of development of a country, on the basis of effective opportunities that people have to lead the lives they have reason to value. Entrepreneurship Development Model for Poverty Alleviation is focused program on pro-poor marginalized community of Nepal. This paper focused on finding of research conducted on different nine indicator of achieved functioning as an impact assessment tool. Capabilities Approach (CA) argued wellbeing is enhanced by expanding the range of things a person could be or do. Secondary data are used from the office of Dhangadhi Sub-metropolitan City and primary data are collected through structured ordinal questionnaire survey to the sample group of 123 persons representing the population of 409. Descriptive assessment is used to analyse the impact of program on peoples’ wellbeing. Individuals reported improved levels of wellbeing. High impact is shown in subjective wellbeing which is measured by overall life satisfaction, moderate impact on health, ability to be oneself, income sufficiency, friendship and decreasing feeling of loneliness and least impact on decreasing discrimination, trust on people and spending for own. The research findings show program has a positive impact on wellbeing, and it is suggested that the capabilities of beneficiaries expanded after joining the MEDEP/MEDPA program.

Keywords : Entrepreneurship Development, Well-being, Capability Approach, Functioning,

References :

1. Alkire, S. (2002). Valuing Freedoms: Sen’s Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction. New York: Oxford University Press. pg.  286
2. Alkire, S. (2005). Subjective quantitative studies of human agency. Social Indicators Research,.
3. Alkire, S. (2008). Concepts and measures of agency. OHPI Working Papers. https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/qehophiwp/ophiwp009.htm
4. Alkire, S. (2015). The capability approach and well-being measurement for public policy. OPHI Working Papers (94).
5. Alkire, S., (2001) Using the Capability Approach: Prospective and Evaluative Analysis
6. Anand, P., Jones, S., Donoghue, M., & Teitler, J. (2021). Non-monetary poverty and deprivation: A capability approach. Journal of European Social Policy, 31(1), 78-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928720938334
7. Bhusal, D. (2021), Capability Approach: A Real Challenge for Senior Citizens in Nepal. International Journal of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics,  SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3804285
8. Central Bureau of Statistics. (n.d.) Population and Housing Senses Report, 2021 https://www.cbs.gov.np
9. Chuma-Mkandawire, S. (2002) SME Financing: International Best Practices
10. Cooper, D.R. & Schindler, P.S. (2008) Bussiness Research Method. McGraw-Hill Irwin
11. Dhangadhi Submetropolitan City (n.d.). https://www.dhangadhimun.gov.np
12. Duff, S. (2022). Social enterprise and wellbeing - Insights from the capability approach. Lincon University
13. Gries, T., Naude, W. (2011), Entrepreneurship and human development: A capability approach, Journal of Public Economics, 95(3–4),  216-224
14. Hogg, R.V. & Tanis, E.A., (2005), Probability and Statistical Inference (7^th ed.) Prentice Hall College
15. Kantor, P. (2002). Gender, Microenterprise Success and Cultural Context: The Case of South Asia. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(4), 131-143. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225870202600408
16. Kim, S. M. (2012). Evaluations of Women-Centered U.S. Microenterprise Development Programs. Affilia, 27(1), 71-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109912437491
17. Kothari, C.R. (2004), New Age International Private Limited Research Methodology (2^nd ed.). New Age International Publications, New Delli
18. Malhotra, A., (2002) Measuring Women’s Empowerment as a Variable in International Development
19. Ministry of Health (n.d.) National Demographic and Health Survey, 2021. https://www.moh.gov.np
20. Ministry of Industry, Commerce and Supply (n.d.), MEDEP Reports and MEDPA Reports
21. National Planning Commision of Nepal (n.d.), Nepal Human Development Report Beyond Graduation: Productive Transformation and Prosperity, (2020). https://www.npc.gov.np
22. Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge University Press.
23. Nussbaum, M. (2003). Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Feminist Economics, 9, 33–59.
24. Nussbaum, M. (2009). Creating capabilities: The human development approach and its implementation. Hypatia, 24(3), 211-215. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527- 2001.2009.01053.x
25. Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating Capabilities. Harvard University Press.
26. Robeyns, I. (2006). The capability approach in practice. Journal of political philosophy, 14(3).
27. Robeyns, I., & Byskov, M. (2020). The Capability Approach Standford University.
28. Sen, A. (1980). Equality of What? In S. McMurrin (ed.) Tanner Lectures on Human Values. Cambridge University Press.
29. Sen, A. (1985). Well-being, agency and freedom: The Dewey lectures 1984. The journal of philosophy, 82(4), 169-221. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2026184
30. Sen, A. (1990). Justice: means versus freedoms. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 111-121.
31. Sen, A. (1992). Inequality re-examined. Clarendon Press.
32. Sen, A. (1993). Capability and well-being. In A. Sen & M. Nussbaum (Eds.), The quality of life (Vol. 30, pp. 9-30). Oxford University Press.
33. Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press.
34. Sen, A. (2004). Capabilities, lists, and public reason: continuing the conversation. Feminist economics, 10(3), 77-80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1354570042000315163
35. Sen, A. (2006). Human rights and capabilities. Journal of human development, 6(2), 151-166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14649880500120491
36. Sen, A. (2017). Collective choice and social welfare. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674974616
37. Sen, A. K. (2009). The idea of justice. Harvard University Press.
38. Shane S. & Venkataraman S. (2000). The promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research. The Academy of Management Review 25(1), 217-226. https://doi.org/10.2307/259271
39. Sodhganga. (n.d.). Thesis and Desertations. https://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/
40. Thapa, A. (2013). Microenterprise development as a poverty-reduction strategy in nepal : A multidimensional analysis of the factors determining microenterprise performance. http://repository.nida.ac.th/handle/662723737/3030.
41. UNDP (n.d.) Reports 2010, 2020, 2022. https://www.undp.org
42. World Bank (n.d.). https://www.wb.org