Authors : Abd. Hafid; M. Dalyan; Citra Andini; Hasria Riski; Sunnuraini; Muhammad Nur Iman

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 9 - September

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/52ebe7u7

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26sep655

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : English expressions have become increasingly common in Indonesian digital communication, including in contexts involving emotions, relationships, self-care, and personal experiences. This study examines why Indonesian digital users choose English expressions when Indonesian equivalents are available and investigates the pragmatic functions performed by such choices. Employing a qualitative descriptive approach, the study analyzes publicly accessible digital communication containing English expressions related to emotional and interpersonal experiences. The data are analyzed by comparing English expressions with their Indonesian equivalents and interpreting their contextual functions through Mey’s Pragmatic Act Theory. The analysis shows that expressions such as healing, toxic, overthinking, burnout, and I need space function beyond simple lexical substitution or code-mixing. They are used to express emotional states, evaluate interpersonal relationships, establish personal boundaries, and manage emotional distance. The findings suggest that English provides Indonesian digital users with a particular linguistic resource for framing and communicating emotionally sensitive experiences. The study therefore argues that Indonesian-English multilingual practices in digital communication should be examined not only in terms of linguistic form but also in terms of the pragmatic consequences of language choice. By shifting attention from the presence of English to the communicative work performed through English, this study contributes to the understanding of multilingualism, digital communication, and pragmatic language use in contemporary Indonesian society.

Keywords : English Expressions; Emotional Communication; Pragmatic Acts; Language Choice; Digital Communication; Indonesian-English Multilingualism.

References :

1. Andini, C., Youngsun, K., Sunnuraini, S., & Warouw, D. S. (2026). Developing a Chunk-Based Learning Model to Improve Korean Speaking Skills for Beginner Learners. International Journal of L2CT, 1(2), 156-172.
2. Aswad, M., Rahman, F., Said, I. M., Hamuddin, B., & Nurchalis, N. F. (2019). A software to increase English learning outcomes: An acceleration model of English as the second language. The Asian EFL Journal, 26(6.2), 157.
3. Harianja, S. I., et al. (2025). Indonesian-English code-switching in TikTok and Instagram: Language choice, identity, and digital communication.
4. Lestari, & Prakoso. (2026). Digital multilingualism and language choice in social media communication.
5. Manuhutu, M. A., Rahmadani, & Suardana. (2024). Indonesian-English code-switching and language contact in social media communication.
6. Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics: An introduction (2nd ed.). Blackwell.
7. Nabila, N., & Idayani, R. (2022). An analysis of Indonesian-English code mixing used in social media (Twitter). J-SHMIC: Journal of English for Academic, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.25299/jshmic.2022.vol9(1).9036
8. Pérez-Sabater, C. (2021). Moments of sharing, language style and resources for solidarity on social media: A comparative analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 180, 266–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.034
9. Pratiwi, N. I., Sosrohadi, S., Rahman, F., Dalyan, M., & Andini, C. (2026). The use of code-mixing by edu-influencers in social media: A communication strategy in sociolinguistic perspective. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science, 11(1), 1034-1042.
10. Putri, et al. (2025). English-Indonesian code-switching and emotional expression in TikTok captions.
11. Ren, W., & Tahir, I. (2026). Pragmatic translanguaging among Indonesian multilingual youth on social media. Journal of Pragmatics, 260, 64–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2026.04.003
12. Rosmaria. (2024). Changes in Indonesian students' linguistic identity in the use of code-mixing in Instagram captions: A digital sociolinguistic study.
13. Sabrina, R. (2021). Internet slang containing code-mixing of English and Indonesian used by millennials on Twitter. Kandai.
14. Said, M. M., Rita, F., Weda, S., & Rahman, F. (2021). English language performance development through extracurricular activities at Faculty of Teacher Training and Education Tadulako University Palu. PalArch's Journal of Archaelogy of Egypt/Egyptology.
15. Shoolihah, N. (2024). Peristiwa campur kode berdasarkan kemampuan bilingualisme dalam sosial media: Instagram dan Twitter: Kajian sosiolinguistik. Jurnal Pena Indonesia.
16. Sultan, & Fitriana. (2024). Code-switching as a communicative strategy among Indonesian university students on social media. Jurnal Tahuri, 21(2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.30598/tahurivol21issue2page155-172
17. Verkerk, et al. (2023). Multilingualism and emotional expression: Language choice and emotional experience.
18. Weda, S., Rahman, F., Atmowardoyo, H., Samad, I. A., Fitriani, S. S., Said, M. M., & Sakti, A. E. F. (2022). Intercultural communicative competence of students from different cultures in EFL classroom interaction in higher institution. International Journal of Research on English Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 1-23.
19. Wibowo, & Hamidah. (2023). Linguistic interplay on social media: Unraveling Indonesian-English code mixing on Twitter. Tamaddun, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.33096/tamaddun.v22i2.547
20. Widiana, Suardana, & Juliarta. (2025). Digital code-switching and Indonesian multilingualism in social media.