White Cord Syndrome after Cervical Decompression: A Narrative Review and Proposed Management Algorithm


Authors : Rathikinda Srinivasulu; Sreevardhan Reddy A

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 9 - September


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3kukmb8e

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/3a79wm3m

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25sep1453

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.


Abstract : Background: White Cord Syndrome (WCS) is a rare but devastating complication of cervical decompression, defined by acute postoperative neurological deterioration with intramedullary T2 hyperintensity on MRI, in the absence of compressive pathology. It is increasingly recognized as a manifestation of ischemia–reperfusion injury of the chronically compressed spinal cord.  Methods: A targeted review of the literature (2010–2025) was performed, including case reports, series, and systematic reviews. Data on clinical presentation, pathophysiology, management, and outcomes were synthesized.  Results: Most patients improved with high-dose steroids and hemodynamic augmentation. Approximately 25–30% underwent additional posterior decompression (laminectomy/laminoplasty). Early surgical rescue was associated with better outcomes than delayed intervention. Controversies remain regarding steroid efficacy, optimal mean arterial pressure (MAP) targets and duration, and timing of surgical escalation.  Conclusions: Medical therapy remains the cornerstone, but urgent posterior decompression may be warranted in refractory cases, especially in multilevel stenosis or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). We present an updated synthesis of evidence, highlight controversies, and propose a pragmatic management algorithm.

References :

  1. Chin KR, Seale J, Cumming V. “White cord syndrome” of acute tetraplegia after anterior cervical decompression and fusion for chronic spinal cord compression: a case report. Case Rep Orthop. 2013;2013:697918.
  2. Kurokawa R, Kim P, et al. Mechanisms of ischemia–reperfusion injury in cervical spinal cord: animal and human evidence. Spine J. 2019;19:765–773.
  3. So JS, Song JS, Choi JY. White cord syndrome: a reperfusion injury following spinal decompression — case and review. Front Neurol. 2022;13:902346.
  4. Busack CD, Eagleton BE. White cord syndrome causing transient tetraplegia after cervical decompression: case report. Ochsner J. 2020;20(3):334–338.
  5. Bagherzadeh S, Balsorano P, et al. “White cord syndrome” as clinical manifestation of spinal cord reperfusion: a systematic review of risk factors, treatments, and outcomes. World Neurosurg. 2024;178:e450–e462.
  6. Buciuc M, et al. White cord syndrome: a rare complication of cervical surgery. Neurology. 2025;104(12):e1154–e1160.
  7. Epstein NE, Agulnick MA. Updated review of cervical white cord syndrome/reperfusion injury: a diagnosis of inclusion requiring MR confirmation. Surg Neurol Int. 2025;16:112–118.
  8. Jun DS, et al. Edaravone as adjunct therapy in white cord syndrome: case experience. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023;24:1123.
  9. Dahapute AA, Pawar SJ, et al. White cord syndrome following posterior decompression: case series and review. Surg Neurol Int. 2022;13:501.
  10. Lei CZ, et al. Late-onset white cord syndrome after ACDF: a case report and review. Exp Ther Med. 2022;24:525.

Background: White Cord Syndrome (WCS) is a rare but devastating complication of cervical decompression, defined by acute postoperative neurological deterioration with intramedullary T2 hyperintensity on MRI, in the absence of compressive pathology. It is increasingly recognized as a manifestation of ischemia–reperfusion injury of the chronically compressed spinal cord.  Methods: A targeted review of the literature (2010–2025) was performed, including case reports, series, and systematic reviews. Data on clinical presentation, pathophysiology, management, and outcomes were synthesized.  Results: Most patients improved with high-dose steroids and hemodynamic augmentation. Approximately 25–30% underwent additional posterior decompression (laminectomy/laminoplasty). Early surgical rescue was associated with better outcomes than delayed intervention. Controversies remain regarding steroid efficacy, optimal mean arterial pressure (MAP) targets and duration, and timing of surgical escalation.  Conclusions: Medical therapy remains the cornerstone, but urgent posterior decompression may be warranted in refractory cases, especially in multilevel stenosis or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). We present an updated synthesis of evidence, highlight controversies, and propose a pragmatic management algorithm.

CALL FOR PAPERS


Paper Submission Last Date
31 - December - 2025

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe