⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



Why Policies Fail: The Independent Effects of Industrial Policy and Trade Openness on Structural Transformation in Nigeria, 1986–2023


Authors : Oluwafisayo Richard Ayanbiyi; Akintoye Victor Adejumo; Felix Ayola Ojo

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 7 - July

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/5n8py5yv

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/y2f6wmjm

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jul1449

Semantic Scholar

ResearchGate

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : Purpose: This study aims to examine the independent effects of industrial policy and trade openness on structural transformation in Nigeria for the period 1986-2023, and to offer empirical evidence on how each policy variable drives or constrains structural transformation in an emerging African economy.  Methodology: The annual time series data for the period 1986-2023 were used. The ratio of manufacturing to agricultural value added was used for measuring ST. Government spending on manufacturing subsidies (GSM) was used to proxy industrial policy (IPol), and trade openness (TO) was measured as the ratio of trade to GDP. Some control variables included were agricultural productivity and inflation. The autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) bounds testing approach of Pesaran, Shin and Smith (2001) was employed and two distinct model specifications were used to allow the independent contribution of each policy variable. Phillips-Perron (PP) and Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) unit root tests were performed to ensure stationarity properties and diagnostic tests such as Breusch-Godfrey LM test, heteroskedasticity tests and CUSUM stability tests were used to verify the estimated model properties.  Findings: There is a strong negative long-run association between industrial policy and structural transformation (β = -38.49; p < 0.01), indicating that economic policy implementation is not only about coordination but also about basic implementation failure. The long-run effect of trade openness on structural transformation is negligible (β = -0.30, p value 0.05), meaning that in 39 years of trade liberalisation, there has been no effect. In both model specifications, agricultural productivity has a significant long-run negative effect on structural transformation, suggesting strong and persistent labour mobility restrictions. These lagged effects are positive for industrial policy and modest positive effects are seen with trade openness, with a time lag of two to three years, but neither are able to overcome the structural inertia in the long-run. Both models of error correction mechanisms show quick convergence to equilibrium, the industrial policy model convergence rate is 97.1% per annum, and the trade openness model is 144.4% per annum.  Originality: This study provides the first dual-model ARDL analysis isolating the independent effects of industrial policy and trade openness on structural transformation in Nigeria over the full SAP-to-AfCFTA policy cycle (1986–2023). It contributes to the literature by demonstrating that policy ineffectiveness in Nigeria is systemic rather than sector-specific, and that agricultural productivity rigidity, not trade exposure, is the dominant structural constraint on manufacturing-led transformation.

Keywords : Industrial Policy, Trade Openness, Structural Transformation, ARDL, Nigeria.

References :

  1. Abiola, A. G., Ogunleye, E. O., & Adebayo, A. A. (2019). Industrial policy instability and manufacturing output in Nigeria. Journal of African Economic Studies, 12(1), 44–62.
  2. Adegoke, A. J., Omotayo, A., & Olaniyan, O. (2020). Trade openness, manufacturing output and structural transformation in Nigeria, 1986–2015. Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies, 62(2), 115–138.
  3. Akinlo, A. E., Yinusa, D. O., & Adejumo, A. V. (2021). Industrial policy, sectoral linkages and structural transformation in Nigeria. African Development Review, 33(4), 671–684. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8268.12552
  4. Andreoni, A. (2016). Transient comparative advantages and structural transformation. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 40(5), 1343–1373. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bev040
  5. Andreoni, A., Chang, H.-J., & Estevez, I. (2021). Industrial policy and structural transformation in Africa. UNIDO Industrial Development Report, Vienna.
  6. Atoyebi, K. O., Oseni, I. O., Ogede, J. S., & Adegboyega, O. (2023). Trade openness and industrial productivity in Nigeria: Revisiting the evidence. Journal of Economics and Allied Research, 8(1), 1–18.
  7. Bakre, O., & Ojugbele, H. (2020). From import substitution to liberalisation: Industrial policy transitions and structural change in Nigeria. Journal of Development Studies, 56(11), 2034–2050.
  8. Brown, R. L., Durbin, J., & Evans, J. M. (1975). Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relationships over time. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series B), 37(2), 149–163.
  9. Chabi, B., & Saygılı, H. (2024). Trade openness and structural transformation in West Africa: A panel data analysis. African Journal of Economic Policy, 31(1), 1–22.
  10. Chen, Z., & Xie, G. (2019). Industrial policy and economic transformation: Lessons from East Asia and implications for Sub-Saharan Africa. World Development, 121, 175–186.
  11. Emako, E., Nuru, S., & Menza, M. (2022). Trade openness and structural transformation in Sub-Saharan Africa. African Development Review, 34(2), 251–264.
  12. Gandjon-Fankem, G., & Feyom, C. (2024). Trade liberalisation and deindustrialisation in Sub-Saharan Africa. Economic Modelling, 131, 106605.
  13. Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1994). Endogenous innovation in the theory of growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 23–44.
  14. Hirschman, A. O. (1958). The strategy of economic development. Yale University Press.
  15. Kaba, B., Lin, J. Y., & Renard, M.-F. (2022). Structural transformation, industrial policy and economic growth in Africa. African Economic Research Consortium Working Paper No. 358, Nairobi.
  16. Krugman, P. (1986). Strategic trade policy and the new international economics. MIT Press.
  17. Krueger, A. O. (2020). Industrial policy redux: Lessons from East Asia for sub-Saharan Africa. World Development, 127, 104840.
  18. Larner, W. (2000). Neo-liberalism: Policy, ideology, governmentality. Studies in Political Economy, 63(1), 5–25.
  19. Lewis, W. A. (1954). Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. The Manchester School, 22(2), 139–191.
  20. Lin, J. Y. (2011). New structural economics: A framework for rethinking development and policy. The World Bank Research Observer, 26(2), 193–221.
  21. Madichie, N. O., Osagu, G., & Eze, J. (2018). Industrial diversification and manufacturing employment in Nigeria. Journal of African Business, 19(3), 363–381.
  22. Mamba, S., Ndhlovu, P., & Dlamini, B. (2020). Structural constraints and industrial policy: Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. Development Policy Review, 38(4), 451–468.
  23. Markaki, M., & Papadakis, E. N. (2023). Structural transformation in emerging economies: An empirical assessment. Economic Change and Restructuring, 56(2), 899–923.
  24. McMillan, M., Rodrik, D., & Verduzco-Gallo, I. (2013). Globalization, structural change and productivity growth, with an update on Africa. World Development, 63, 11–32.
  25. National Bureau of Statistics. (2024). Nigerian GDP report (Various issues). NBS Publications, Abuja.
  26. Ogunleye, E. K. (2017). Local content policy and industrial growth in Nigeria's oil sector. OPEC Energy Review, 41(2), 108–130.
  27. Omoke, P. C., & Opuala-Charles, S. (2021). Institutional quality, trade openness and industrial productivity in Nigeria, 1980–2018. Economies, 9(3), 117.
  28. Omotayo, A., & Odeleke, O. (2022). Industrial policy failures and manufacturing decline in Nigeria, 1980–2020. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 13(2), 218–234.
  29. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326.
  30. Rodrik, D. (2014). Green industrial policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 30(3), 469–491.
  31. Rosenstein-Rodan, P. N. (1943). Problems of industrialisation of Eastern and South-Eastern Europe. Economic Journal, 53(210/211), 202–211.
  32. Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65–94.
  33. Timmer, C. P., & Akkus, S. (2008). The structural transformation as a pathway out of poverty: Analytics, empirics and politics (CGD Working Paper No. 150). Washington, D.C.: Centre for Global Development.
  34. Umoru, D., & Eborieme, M. (2013). Trade liberalisation and industrial growth in Nigeria, 1980–2010. Current Research Journal of Economic Theory, 5(2), 43–51.
  35. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2021). Trade and Development Report 2021: From recovery to resilience — The development dimension. Geneva: United Nations.
  36. United Nations Industrial Development Organisation (UNIDO). (2021). Industrial Development Report 2022: The future of industrialization in a post-pandemic world. Vienna: UNIDO.
  37. World Bank. (2024). World Development Indicators. Retrieved from https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators

Purpose: This study aims to examine the independent effects of industrial policy and trade openness on structural transformation in Nigeria for the period 1986-2023, and to offer empirical evidence on how each policy variable drives or constrains structural transformation in an emerging African economy.  Methodology: The annual time series data for the period 1986-2023 were used. The ratio of manufacturing to agricultural value added was used for measuring ST. Government spending on manufacturing subsidies (GSM) was used to proxy industrial policy (IPol), and trade openness (TO) was measured as the ratio of trade to GDP. Some control variables included were agricultural productivity and inflation. The autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) bounds testing approach of Pesaran, Shin and Smith (2001) was employed and two distinct model specifications were used to allow the independent contribution of each policy variable. Phillips-Perron (PP) and Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) unit root tests were performed to ensure stationarity properties and diagnostic tests such as Breusch-Godfrey LM test, heteroskedasticity tests and CUSUM stability tests were used to verify the estimated model properties.  Findings: There is a strong negative long-run association between industrial policy and structural transformation (β = -38.49; p < 0.01), indicating that economic policy implementation is not only about coordination but also about basic implementation failure. The long-run effect of trade openness on structural transformation is negligible (β = -0.30, p value 0.05), meaning that in 39 years of trade liberalisation, there has been no effect. In both model specifications, agricultural productivity has a significant long-run negative effect on structural transformation, suggesting strong and persistent labour mobility restrictions. These lagged effects are positive for industrial policy and modest positive effects are seen with trade openness, with a time lag of two to three years, but neither are able to overcome the structural inertia in the long-run. Both models of error correction mechanisms show quick convergence to equilibrium, the industrial policy model convergence rate is 97.1% per annum, and the trade openness model is 144.4% per annum.  Originality: This study provides the first dual-model ARDL analysis isolating the independent effects of industrial policy and trade openness on structural transformation in Nigeria over the full SAP-to-AfCFTA policy cycle (1986–2023). It contributes to the literature by demonstrating that policy ineffectiveness in Nigeria is systemic rather than sector-specific, and that agricultural productivity rigidity, not trade exposure, is the dominant structural constraint on manufacturing-led transformation.

Keywords : Industrial Policy, Trade Openness, Structural Transformation, ARDL, Nigeria.

Paper Submission Last Date
31 - August - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe