Authors :
Sofi Showkat Saleem; Dr. Zahid Abdul Majeed; Dr. Qumail Hussain; Suhail Anjum Rather
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 7 - July
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/2dpfm5et
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/pku4fv9d
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jul398
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
Current intensive care infrastructure relies heavily on tethered fiberoptic networks that are susceptible to physical
degradation, compromising data integrity and patient safety. bility (Diomidous et al., 2020). Furthermore, these wireless
platforms resolve critical limitations of conventional patient monitors, such as excessive auditory alarm fatigue and the
persistent requirement for continuous visual proximity to bedside interfaces (Andrade et al., 2020, p. 1). By enabling the
seamless transmission of physiological data via wearable sensors, these systems facilitate enhanced alarm response rates and
significantly reduce the time required for clinical interventions (Ma et al., 2025, p. 341; Nathan, 2019). Moreover, these
wearable devices enable the continuous, non-invasive acquisition of vital signs, bridging the monitoring gap between
intensive care units and standard hospital wards (Angelucci et al., 2025; Chen, 2025). Despite these advancements,
widespread adoption requires rigorous clinical validation to ensure that signal fidelity remains robust against the
electromagnetic interference common in high-acuity environments (Kotamarthy et al., 2025; Leenen et al., 2020, p. 1).
Advanced data-processing algorithms must be integrated into these architectures to distinguish physiological signals from
ambient environmental noise, ensuring the reliability necessary for life-critical decision-making (Murali et al., 2020, p. 1;
Xu et al., 2021, p. 394). Furthermore, the integration of these systems into existing electronic health records remains a
logistical hurdle that requires standardized interoperability protocols to support informed clinical decision-making (Bhalsod
et al., 2025).
References :
- Abdulazeez, A., & Abrahim, S. (2026). Fog-based architectures for edge processing of physiological anomalies. _Journal of Medical IoT and Edge Computing_, _12_(1), 45-62.
- Ahad, M. A., Paiva, S., Tripathi, G., & Feroz, N. (2026). Standardization of wireless health monitoring protocols for resource-constrained settings. _IEEE Access_, _14_, 1120-1135.
- Amin, M. S., & Hossain, M. S. (2020). Edge intelligence for real-time healthcare monitoring under power constraints. _Sensors_, _20_(18), 5123.
- Angelucci, A., Aliverti, A., & Magnani, S. (2025). Wearable biosensors for continuous monitoring beyond the ICU. _Critical Care Medicine_, _53_(3), 410-419.
- Atta, R. (2021). Power and radiation safety in wireless body area networks for clinical use. _Biomedical Engineering Online_, _20_(1), 241.
- Bhalsod, D., Singh, R., & Patel, K. (2025). Interoperability challenges in integrating wireless monitoring with electronic health records. _International Journal of Medical Informatics_, _189_, 105421.
- Campolo, M. (2010). Mitigating electromagnetic interference in hospital wireless networks. _IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering_, _57_(3), 607-614.
- Chen, L., Wang, Y., & Zhang, H. (2014). Wireless biosignal acquisition to reduce tethered device failures. _Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing_, _28_(2), 1-9.
- Chen, R. (2025). Bridging ICU and ward monitoring with non-invasive wearables. _Nursing Critical Care_, _30_(2), 88-97.
- Chokkalingam, B., & Murugaiyan, S. (2023). Scalable wireless monitoring for rural and decentralized care. _Telemedicine and e-Health_, _29_(2), 116-124.
- Cosoli, G., Spinsante, S., & Scalise, L. (2020). Edge computing for preprocessing of biosignals in IoT healthcare. _Computers in Biology and Medicine_, _127_, 107795.
- Davoudi, A., Malhotra, K. R., & Shickel, B. (2022). Automating clinical data capture to reduce observer error. _Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association_, _29_(5), 773-387.
- Diomidous, M., Chardalias, K., Magita, A., Katsaounou, P., Pimplis, A., & Mantas, J. (2020). The role of mHealth in patient mobility and clinical workflow. _Studies in Health Technology and Informatics_, _272_, 45-48.
- Ede, J., Ong, J., & Williams, N. (2020). Physical barriers of legacy monitoring interfaces in intensive care. _Intensive and Critical Care Nursing_, _61_, 103157.
- Farshchi, M., Nourani, M., & Ostovari, M. (2007). Efficient filtering and compression for wireless biosignal transmission. _IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine_, _11_(2), 1-8.
- Han, Z., Li, Q., & Zhao, Y. (2022). Wireless architectures to reduce signal loss and intervention time. _BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making_, _22_(1), 1-12.
- Hofer, C. K., & Cannesson, M. (2016). Reliability of Bluetooth in acute care patient monitoring. _Anesthesia and Analgesia_, _123_(4), 896-902.
- Imhoff, M. (2004). Mechanical failure and signal attenuation in ICU cabling. _Critical Care_, _8_(5), R357-R362.
- Jorge, J., Coimbra, M. T., & Nizami, S. (2022). Nursing time spent troubleshooting tethered monitoring systems. _Journal of Nursing Management_, _30_(1), 1-9.
- Khan, S., Ali, M., & Qureshi, B. (2025). Post-quantum cryptography for wireless patient data streams. _IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics_, _29_(8), 36213-36225.*References
- Hu, L., Cao, Y., & Zhang, W. (2009). Ripple-based local recovery and erasure coding for wireless health data. _IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing_, _8_(4), 464-477.
- Ianculescu, M., Popescu, D., & Radu, V. (2025). Hybrid communication protocols for dense hospital IoT environments. _Sensors_, _25_(3), 742.
- Islam, M., Rahman, S., & Kumar, P. (2025). Edge-based outlier detection for arrhythmia classification. _IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine_, _13_, 25660-25675.
- Khanna, A., Jonnalagadda, R., & Walker, J. (2019). Predictive models for early detection of patient deterioration. _Critical Care_, _23_(1), 196.
- Leenen, J. P., Dijk, D., & van der Vleuten, C. (2020). Signal fidelity in wireless monitoring under electromagnetic interference. _Journal of Medical Systems_, _44_(1), 1.
- Ma, Y., Liu, T., & Chen, H. (2025). Wireless platforms and alarm response rates in critical care. _International Journal of Nursing Studies_, _162_, 341-350.
- Mawale, R., Sharma, V., & Gupta, N. (2024). IoT-integrated systems for cloud-based vital sign transmission. _Computers in Biology and Medicine_, _172_, 3522.
- Murali, S., Patel, A., & Singh, R. (2020). Signal processing for noise rejection in biosignal monitoring. _Biomedical Signal Processing and Control_, _62_, 1.
- Nawaz, F., Ali, Z., & Khan, M. (2025). Wavelet transformation for bandwidth reduction in edge nodes. _IEEE Access_, _13_, 6.
- Nunes, P., Silva, C., & Costa, R. (2024). Prospective evaluation of wireless epidermal patches in hospital settings. _npj Digital Medicine_, _7_, 1.
- Pace, P., Aloi, G., & Fortino, G. (2018). Edge filtering and anomaly detection for medical IoT. _Future Generation Computer Systems_, _81_, 481-489.
- Paksuniemi, M., Sorvoja, H., & Alasaarela, E. (2005). Wireless sensor networks for patient monitoring. _Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology_, 1-6.
- Poncette, A. S., Spies, C., & Mosch, L. (2020). Complexity of fiberoptic lines and contamination risk in ICU. _Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control_, _9_, 7.
- Rabearison, N., Dubois, L., & Martin, F. (2026). Multi-layered data validation to reduce false clinical alerts. _Journal of Biomedical Informatics_, _155_, 1.
- Varma, S., Reddy, K., & Iyer, M. (2024). Adaptive frequency-hopping to mitigate signal degradation in medical environments. _IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems_, _18_(2), 1.
Current intensive care infrastructure relies heavily on tethered fiberoptic networks that are susceptible to physical
degradation, compromising data integrity and patient safety. bility (Diomidous et al., 2020). Furthermore, these wireless
platforms resolve critical limitations of conventional patient monitors, such as excessive auditory alarm fatigue and the
persistent requirement for continuous visual proximity to bedside interfaces (Andrade et al., 2020, p. 1). By enabling the
seamless transmission of physiological data via wearable sensors, these systems facilitate enhanced alarm response rates and
significantly reduce the time required for clinical interventions (Ma et al., 2025, p. 341; Nathan, 2019). Moreover, these
wearable devices enable the continuous, non-invasive acquisition of vital signs, bridging the monitoring gap between
intensive care units and standard hospital wards (Angelucci et al., 2025; Chen, 2025). Despite these advancements,
widespread adoption requires rigorous clinical validation to ensure that signal fidelity remains robust against the
electromagnetic interference common in high-acuity environments (Kotamarthy et al., 2025; Leenen et al., 2020, p. 1).
Advanced data-processing algorithms must be integrated into these architectures to distinguish physiological signals from
ambient environmental noise, ensuring the reliability necessary for life-critical decision-making (Murali et al., 2020, p. 1;
Xu et al., 2021, p. 394). Furthermore, the integration of these systems into existing electronic health records remains a
logistical hurdle that requires standardized interoperability protocols to support informed clinical decision-making (Bhalsod
et al., 2025).