Authors : Dr. Gulab Dass Vaishnava

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 7 - July

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/35zadrkz

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/yc5eu28

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25jul679

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.

Abstract : This study examines the role of workplace engagement as a mediator between leadership style and talent retention in firms within Jodhpur District, Rajasthan. A quantitative methodology was used to collect data from 250 workers across several industries using structured questionnaires. The research examines three unique leadership styles— transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire—and evaluates their impact on employee engagement and retention results. The “Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ)” was used to evaluate leadership styles, the “Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES)” assessed employee engagement, and a tailored scale rated talent retention. Statistical techniques such as Cronbach’s Alpha for reliability, along with T-tests and ANOVA for hypothesis testing, were applied. Results indicate that transformational leadership markedly boosts workplace engagement, which subsequently has a strong positive impact on retaining talent. Transactional leadership demonstrates a moderate positive influence, whereas laissez-faire leadership shows a detrimental effect on both engagement and retention. Furthermore, the analysis reveals that workplace engagement fully mediates the link between transformational leadership & talent retention, partially mediates in the case of transactional leadership, and does not serve as a mediator for laissez-faire leadership. The study underscores the importance of cultivating employee engagement through effective leadership practices to improve retention rates. These insights enrich the existing body of knowledge on organizational behavior and offer actionable guidance for managers seeking to reduce employee turnover and strengthen commitment. However, the study’s focus on a specific geographic region and its reliance on self-reported data are noted limitations, indicating the need for future research in varied contexts and using longitudinal methods.

Keywords : Leadership Style, Workplace Engagement, Talent Retention.

References :

1. Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2004). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire: Manual and sampler set (3rd ed.). Mind Garden.
2. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
3. Berson, Y., Shamir, B., Avolio, B. J., & Popper, M. (2001). The relationship between vision strength, leadership style, and context. The Leadership Quarterly, 12(1), 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1048-9843(01)00064-9
4. Bear, J. B., Cushenbery, L., London, M., & Sherman, G. D. (2017). Performance feedback, power retention, and the gender gap in leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(6), 721–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.02.003
5. Chen, J.-C., & Silverthorne, C. (2005). Leadership effectiveness, leadership style and employee readiness. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 26(4), 280–288. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730510600652
6. Connelly, S., & Ruark, G. (2010). Leadership style and activating potential moderators of the relationships among leader emotional displays and outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(5), 745–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.07.005
7. Druskat, V. U. (1994). Gender and leadership style: Transformational and transactional leadership in the Roman Catholic Church. The Leadership Quarterly, 5(2), 99–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(94)90023-x
8. Festing, M., & Schäfer, L. (2014). Generational challenges to talent management: A framework for talent retention based on the psychological-contract perspective. Journal of World Business, 49(2), 262–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2013.11.010
9. Holten, A.-L., & Brenner, S. O. (2015). Leadership style and the process of organizational change. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 36(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-11-2012-0155
10. Lyons, J. B., & Schneider, T. R. (2009). The effects of leadership style on stress outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(5), 737–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.06.010
11. McColl-Kennedy, J. R., & Anderson, R. D. (2002). Impact of leadership style and emotions on subordinate performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(5), 545–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1048-9843(02)00143-1
12. Mosadegh Rad, A. M., & Yarmohammadian, M. H. (2006). A study of relationship between managers' leadership style and employees' job satisfaction. Leadership in Health Services, 19(2), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/13660750610665008
13. Moss, S. A., & Ritossa, D. A. (2007). The impact of goal orientation on the association between leadership style and follower performance, creativity and work attitudes. Leadership, 3(4), 433–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715007082966
14. Ohunakin, F., Adeniji, A. A., Oludayo, O. A., Osibanjo, A. O., & Oduyoye, O. O. (2019). Employees’ retention in Nigeria’s hospitality industry: The role of transformational leadership style and job satisfaction. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 18(4), 441–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332845.2019.1626795
15. Pandita, D., & Ray, S. (2018). Talent management and employee engagement – a meta-analysis of their impact on talent retention. Industrial and Commercial Training, 50(4), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1108/ict-09-2017-0073
16. Saleem, A., Aslam, S., Rafiq, J., & Rao, C. (2019). Principal leadership style and teacher job performance: Evidence from Pakistan. Advance. https://doi.org/10.31124/advance.7927259.v3
17. Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248
18. Solansky, S. T. (2008). Leadership style and team processes in self-managed teams. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 14(4), 332–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051808315549
19. Sosik, J. J., & Dinger, S. L. (2007). Relationships between leadership style and vision content: The moderating role of need for social approval, self-monitoring, and need for social power. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(2), 134–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.01.004
20. Tariq, M. U. (2024). AI and the future of talent management. In Advances in Human Resources Management and Organizational Development (pp. 1–16). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-1938-3.ch001
21. Yu, H.-C., & Miller, P. (2005). Leadership style. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 26(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730510575570
22. Zhang, J., Ahammad, M. F., Tarba, S., Cooper, C. L., Glaister, K. W., & Wang, J. (2014). The effect of leadership style on talent retention during merger and acquisition integration: Evidence from China. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(7), 1021–1050. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2014.908316