Advances in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery: Revolutionizing Women’s Health


Authors : Dr. Manjula S Patil; Dr. Pranavi Nagendla; Dr. Harini P Shetty; Dr. Kavitha Lakshmi Easwaran; Dr. Amulya B; Dr. Shwetha Yadav; Dr. Swetha Vinjamuri

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 12 - December

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/muz3xhr4

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/bdh8s7ze

DOI : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14557344

Abstract : Minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS) has transformed the management of gynecological conditions, offering patients the advantage of less pain, quicker recovery and improved outcomes compared to traditional open surgeries. This article explores the key advancements in MIGS techniques including laparoscopy, robotic-assisted surgery, and hysteroscopy. It also highlights the latest innovations such as single-port laparoscopy, advanced energy devices and image-guided technologies. The impact of these techniques on women’s health, including reduced morbidity, improved fertility outcomes, and enhanced quality of life, is critically examined. The article concludes by discussing future directions for MIGS and its role in global healthcare.

Keywords : Minimally Invasive Surgery, Gynecology, Laparoscopy, Robotic Surgery, Hysteroscopy, Women’s Health.

References :

  1. Nezhat, C., et al. (2018). Laparoscopic hysterectomy: An overview and update. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 25(4), 547-558.
  2. Sarlos, D., et al. (2020). Robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy: A prospective randomized trial of outcomes in gynecologic oncology. Gynecologic Oncology, 156(3), 588-594.
  3. Gupta, J. K., et al. (2019). Hysteroscopic management of submucosal fibroids: A review of fertility outcomes. Fertility and Sterility, 112(3), 415-423.
  4. Escobar, P. F., et al. (2021). Single-port laparoscopy: Current status and future directions. Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, 25(4), e2021.00098.
  5. Brubaker, L., et al. (2018). Use of advanced energy devices in gynecologic surgery: Improving outcomes and reducing complications. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 218(2), 213-221.
  6. Riva, G., et al. (2022). Augmented reality and fluorescence imaging in gynecologic surgery: Future perspectives. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 16(2), 123-130.
  7. Cohen, S. L., et al. (2020). Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy: A multicenter prospective study. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 135(5), 1039-1045.
  8. Mekaru, K., et al. (2019). Laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 26(6), 952-960.
  9. Jacoby, V. L., et al. (2019). Patient satisfaction and body image after minimally invasive versus open gynecologic surgery. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 221(6), 609-619.
  10. Murphy, A. A., et al. (2022). The future of robotic surgery in gynecology: Challenges and opportunities. Gynecologic Surgery, 19(1), 10-15.
  11. Kim, J. H., et al. (2021). Artificial intelligence in robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery: Current status and future applications. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 28(5), 866-872.
  12. Adelusi, B., et al. (2021). Expanding access to minimally invasive gynecologic surgery in low-resource settings: A global perspective. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 155(1), 73-79.
  13. Van der Meij, K., et al. (2019). Single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy: A systematic review of outcomes and complications. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 238, 111-117.
  14. Duncan, A. J., et al. (2021). The impact of robotic-assisted surgery on gynecologic oncology outcomes. Gynecologic Oncology, 160(3), 487-494.
  15. Wang, Y., et al. (2021). Minimally invasive surgery in deep infiltrating endometriosis: Current status and future perspectives. Reproductive Sciences, 28(4), 1227-1236.
  16. Rabinowitz, M., et al. (2021). The role of fluorescence-guided surgery in gynecologic oncology: A review of current applications. Journal of Surgical Oncology, 124(5), 950-957.
  17. Taylor, A., et al. (2020). The integration of artificial intelligence into robotic surgery: Improving outcomes in gynecologic cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 38(15), 1751-1758.
  18. Delpy, R., et al. (2019). Hysteroscopic treatment of intrauterine adhesions: A review of techniques and outcomes. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 26(2), 193-201.
  19. Sarlos, D., et al. (2019). Clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgery in deep infiltrating endometriosis: A comparative analysis. Journal of Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Disorders, 11(3), 143-149.
  20. Chiu, S. T., et al. (2021). The use of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery: Current and emerging applications. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 28(4), 712-718.

Minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS) has transformed the management of gynecological conditions, offering patients the advantage of less pain, quicker recovery and improved outcomes compared to traditional open surgeries. This article explores the key advancements in MIGS techniques including laparoscopy, robotic-assisted surgery, and hysteroscopy. It also highlights the latest innovations such as single-port laparoscopy, advanced energy devices and image-guided technologies. The impact of these techniques on women’s health, including reduced morbidity, improved fertility outcomes, and enhanced quality of life, is critically examined. The article concludes by discussing future directions for MIGS and its role in global healthcare.

Keywords : Minimally Invasive Surgery, Gynecology, Laparoscopy, Robotic Surgery, Hysteroscopy, Women’s Health.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe