Authors :
Arnab Sen
Volume/Issue :
Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 11 - November
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/582w69uh
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/mr495sb3
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25nov578
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.
Abstract :
Background
The advancement of Natural Language Processing (NLP) is constrained by a fundamental dilemma: the immense resource
requirements of Large Language Models (LLMs) versus the demand for efficient, high-performance deployment in resource-
limited settings, such as edge computing.1 This work establishes a necessary comparison between efficient deep learning
alternatives and classical statistical methods.1
Materials and Methods
A structural and performance analysis is conducted, comparing two distinct model classes: traditional statistical N-gram
models and modern Transformer-based Compact Language Models (CLMs).1 The methodology critically evaluates core
architectural differences, efficiency metrics, and the transformative impact of tokenization strategies. Key quantitative metrics,
including Perplexity (PPL), and qualitative measures, such as semantic coherence and visual embedding consistency (via t-SNE),
are employed.1
Results
CLMs, achieved through rigorous optimization techniques like pruning and quantization, exhibit superior representational
capacity and drastically faster development cycles compared to resource-intensive LLMs.1 N-gram models are fundamentally
hindered by the exponential challenge of data sparsity and the inability to capture context beyond a fixed, narrow window.1
Crucially, the CLM's implementation of subword tokenization (specifically Byte Pair Encoding, BPE) structurally solves the
Out-of-Vocabulary (OOV) problem, preserving semantic information that N-gram models invariably destroy by collapsing
unseen words into a generic $\langle \text{unk} \rangle$ token.1
Conclusion
The architectural stability, efficiency, and deep contextual fidelity afforded by optimized Compact Language Models
position them as the definitive, operationally feasible choice for high-accuracy, specialized NLP tasks at the network edge.1
While N-gram models may serve as simple baselines for modeling localized statistical distributions, their severe architectural
limitations make them unsuitable for modern applications requiring complex semantic understanding.1
Keywords :
Compact Language Models (CLMs); Subword Encoding; Byte Pair Encoding (BPE); Edge Computing; Perplexity; Transformer.
References :
- D. Jurafsky and J. H. Martin, Speech and Language Processing, 3rd ed. Prentice Hall, 2023. \cite{26}
- J. Jokah, "Small Language Models (SLMs): The Rise of Efficient AI," Hugging Face Blog, 2024. \cite{26}
- J. Lin and D. Klein, "Efficiently storing and querying n-gram language models," in Proc.
- 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 2011, pp. 56–65. \cite{26}
- J. Lin and D. Klein, "Efficiently storing and querying n-gram language models," in Proc.
- 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 2011, pp. 56–65. \cite{26}
- R. Dey, "Understanding Language Modeling: From N-grams to Transformer-Based Neural Models," Medium, 2023. \cite{26}
- S. Behera, "A Comparative Analysis of Different LLM Evaluation Metrics," Medium, 2023. \cite{26}
- F. Dernoncourt, "At what N do N-grams become counterproductive?" Stack Exchange, 2016. \cite{26}
- R. Bansal, "Perplexity Metric for LLM Evaluation," Analytics Vidhya, 2025. \cite{26}
- A. Srivastava and R. Prasad, "A New Look at N-gram Interpolation for Language Modeling," ACL, 2016. \cite{26}
- S. Soman, "Testing & Evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs): Key Metrics and Best Practices (Part 2)," Medium, 2023. \cite{26}
- T. Reddy, "A Taxonomy of LLM Evaluation Metrics," Arya.ai Blog, 2024. \cite{26}
- J. Zhang, "Exploring the Inductive Biases of Transformers for Language Modeling," EMNLP 2024, 2024. \cite{26}
- X. Jing and Y. Zhang, "Leveraging Small Language Models for Enhanced Training, Fine-Tuning, and Adaptation of Large Language Models," IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2025. \cite{26}
- V. Nguyen, "Large and Small Language Models: A Side-by-Side Comparison," Rabiloo Blog, 2024. \cite{26}
- Unknown, "Small Language Models: A Business Guide," Delivering Data Analytics, 2024. \cite{26}
- Unknown, "SLM vs LLM: Which is Right for Your Business?" Weka.IO, 2024. \cite{26}
- Unknown, "Small Language Models: The Future of Efficient AI," Aisera, 2024. \cite{26}
- H. Wang and K. Singh, "The impact of tokenization in genomic language models," bioRxiv, 2024. \cite{26}
- F. Chiusano, "Two Minutes NLP: A Taxonomy of Tokenization Methods," Medium, 2022. \cite{26}
- H. Huggingface, "Tokenizer Summary," Hugging Face Documentation, 2024. \cite{26}
- S. Som, "Byte Pair Encoding vs Unigram Tokenization: A Deep Dive into Subword Models," Medium, 2022. \cite{26}
- J. Lin, "Simple Template of IEEEtran.cls for IEEE Journals by Jinwei Lin," IEEE Journals, 2023. \cite{26}
- J. Lin, "Simple Template of IEEEtran.cls for IEEE Journals by Jinwei Lin," IEEE Journals, 2023. \cite{26}
- W.J. Book, "Modelling design and control of flexible manipulator arms: A tutorial review," in Proc. 29th IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, San Francisco, CA, 1990, 500-506. \cite{26}
- D.S. Chan, "Theory and implementation of multidimensional discrete systems for signal processing," doctoral diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 1978. \cite{26}
- Plagiarism Free Writing Techniques: Avoiding Common Pitfalls in Research Writing - San Francisco Edit, accessed on November 7, 2025, https://www.sfedit.net/plagiarism-free-writing-techniques-avoiding-common-pitfalls-in-research-writing/
- How to Write a Plagiarism-Free Research Paper or Thesis - Papergen AI, accessed on November 7, 2025, https://www.papergen.ai/blog/how-to-write-a-plagiarism-free-research-paper-or-thesis
- How to Avoid Plagiarism | Harvard Guide to Using Sources, accessed on November 7, 2025, https://usingsources.fas.harvard.edu/how-avoid-plagiarism-0
- Best Practices to Avoid Plagiarism - Purdue OWL, accessed on November 7, 2025, https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/avoiding_plagiarism/best_practices.html
- IOSR Manuscript Preparation Guidelines | PDF - Scribd, accessed on November 7, 2025, ((https://www.scribd.com/document/768600584/IOSR-Manuscript-Preparation-Guidelines))
- Paper preparation guidelines for IOSR Journal of Engineering, accessed on November 7, 2025, https://ternaengg.ac.in/equinox2018/PaperFormat.pdf
- Manuscript Preparation Guidelines (2 Page) | PDF | Abstract (Summary) | Paragraph - Scribd, accessed on November 7, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/98842041/Manuscript-Preparation-Guidelines-2-Page
- IOSR Journal of Computer Engineering (IOSR-JCE) Template - International Organization of Scientific Research - SciSpace, accessed on November 7, 2025, https://scispace.com/formats/international-organization-of-scientific-research/iosr-journal-of-computer-engineering-iosr-jce/489e0da8074e4cfc8b861a6709e6969f
- Paper Template - IOSR Journal, accessed on November 7, 2025, ((https://www.iosrjournals.org/doc/Paper%20Template.doc))
- N-gram Language Models - Stanford University, accessed on November 7, 2025, https://web.stanford.edu/~jurafsky/slp3/3.pdf
- Word n-gram language model - Wikipedia, accessed on November 7, 2025, ((https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Word_n-gram_language_model))
- Transformer (deep learning architecture) - Wikipedia, accessed on November 7, 2025, ((https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformer_(deep_learning_architecture)
- Small Language Models (SLM): A Comprehensive Overview - Hugging Face, accessed on November 7, 2025, https://huggingface.co/blog/jjokah/small-language-model
- SLM vs LLM: The Key Differences - WEKA, accessed on November 7, 2025, https://www.weka.io/learn/ai-ml/slm-vs-llm/
- What Are Small Language Models (SLMs)? A Practical Guide - Aisera, accessed on November 7, 2025, https://aisera.com/blog/small-language-models/
- Large and small language models: A side-by-side comparison - Rabiloo, accessed on November 7, 2025, https://rabiloo.com/blog/large-and-small-language-models-a-side-by-side-comparison
- Understanding Language Modeling: From N-grams to Transformer-based Neural Models | by Roshmita Dey |
Medium, accessed on November 7, 2025, https://medium.com/@roshmitadey/understanding-language-modeling-from-n-grams-to-transformer-based-neural-models-d2bdf1532c6d
- LLM Transformer Model Visually Explained - Polo Club of Data Science, accessed on November 7, 2025, https://poloclub.github.io/transformer-explainer/
- Comparing the Effect of Smoothing and N-gram Order - Scholarship Repository @ Florida Tech, accessed on November 7, 2025, https://repository.fit.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1712&context=etd
- Faster and Smaller N-Gram Language Models - ACL Anthology, accessed on November 7, 2025, https://aclanthology.org/P11-1027.pdf
- Faster and Smaller N-Gram Language Models - The Berkeley NLP Group, accessed on November 7, 2025, http://nlp.cs.berkeley.edu/pubs/Pauls-Klein_2011_LM_paper.pdf
- Summary of the tokenizers - Hugging Face, accessed on November 7, 2025, https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/en/tokenizer_summary
- Predictive Incremental Parsing Helps Language Modeling - ACL Anthology, accessed on November 7, 2025, https://aclanthology.org/C16-1026.pdf
- Byte Pair Encoding vs. Unigram Tokenization: A Deep Dive into Subword Models - Medium, accessed on November 7, 2025, https://medium.com/@hexiangnan/byte-pair-encoding-vs-unigram-tokenization-a-deep-dive-into-subword-models-4963246e9a34
- Two minutes NLP — A Taxonomy of Tokenization Methods |
by Fabio Chiusano - Medium, accessed on November 7, 2025, https://medium.com/nlplanet/two-minutes-nlp-a-taxonomy-of-tokenization-methods-60e330aacad3
- Arnab Sen Paper.docx
- Can Transformers Learn n-gram Language Models? - ACL Anthology, accessed on November 7, 2025, https://aclanthology.org/2024.emnlp-main.550.pdf
- A Comparison of Tokenization Impact in Attention Based and State Space Genomic Language Models |
bioRxiv, accessed on November 7, 2025, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.09.09.612081v2.full-text
- A Comparative analysis of different LLM Evaluation Metrics |
by Satyadeep Behera - Medium, accessed on November 7, 2025, https://medium.com/@satyadeepbehera/a-comparative-analysis-of-different-llm-evaluation-metrics-98395c3d8e79
- Perplexity Metric for LLM Evaluation - Analytics Vidhya, accessed on November 7, 2025, https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/blog/2025/04/perplexity-metric-for-Ilm-evaluation/
- How to evaluate a text generation model: strengths and limitations of popular evaluation metrics - The Analytics Lab, accessed on November 7, 2025, https://theanalyticslab.nl/how-to-evaluate-a-text-generation-model-strengths-and-limitations-of-popular-evaluation-metrics/
- LLM Evaluation: 15 Metrics You Need to Know, accessed on November 7, 2025, https://arya.ai/blog/llm-evaluation-metrics
- Testing & Evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs): Key Metrics and Best Practices Part-2, accessed on November 7, 2025, https://medium.com/@sumit.somanchd/testing-evaluating-large-language-models-llms-key-metrics-and-best-practices-part-2-0ac7092c9776
- Small Language Models: A Business Leader's Guide to Affordable, Task-Tuned Al, accessed on November 7, 2025, https://deliveringdataanalytics.com/small-language-models-business-guide/
- The Rise of Small Language Models - IEEE Computer Society, accessed on November 7, 2025, ((https://www.computer.org/csdl/magazine/ex/2025/01/10897262/24uGPS4TUQO))
- Arnab Paper 2 (1).docx
- The State of Large Language Models for African Languages: Progress and
Challenges, accessed on November 10, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2506.02280v3
- Transformer (deep learning architecture) - Wikipedia, accessed on November 10,
2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformer_(deep_learning_architecture
- Visualizing Embeddings With t-SNE - Kaggle, accessed on November 10, 2025, https://www.kaggle.com/code/colinmorris/visualizing-embeddings-with-t-sne
- Understanding Transformer Models in ML - Medium, accessed on November 10,
2025, https://medium.com/@pacosun/the-architecture-that-changed-ai-5b588a4e2cb9
- Boundless Byte Pair Encoding: Breaking the Pre-tokenization Barrier - arXiv, accessed on November 10, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2504.00178v1
- Perplexity of fixed-length models - Hugging Face, accessed on November 10, 2025, https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/perplexity
- t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding - Wikipedia, accessed on November 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-distributed_stochastic_neighbor_embedding
- Perplexity-Based Data Pruning With Small Reference Models - OpenReview, accessed on November 10, 2025, https://openreview.net/forum?id=1GTARJhxtq
- Paper Writing Best Practices - ICML 2025, accessed on November 10, 2025, https://icml.cc/Conferences/2022/BestPractices
- Architectural Evaluation of Subword Tokenization and Compact Language Models (CLMs) for Resource-Constrained NLP Deployment.docx
Background
The advancement of Natural Language Processing (NLP) is constrained by a fundamental dilemma: the immense resource
requirements of Large Language Models (LLMs) versus the demand for efficient, high-performance deployment in resource-
limited settings, such as edge computing.1 This work establishes a necessary comparison between efficient deep learning
alternatives and classical statistical methods.1
Materials and Methods
A structural and performance analysis is conducted, comparing two distinct model classes: traditional statistical N-gram
models and modern Transformer-based Compact Language Models (CLMs).1 The methodology critically evaluates core
architectural differences, efficiency metrics, and the transformative impact of tokenization strategies. Key quantitative metrics,
including Perplexity (PPL), and qualitative measures, such as semantic coherence and visual embedding consistency (via t-SNE),
are employed.1
Results
CLMs, achieved through rigorous optimization techniques like pruning and quantization, exhibit superior representational
capacity and drastically faster development cycles compared to resource-intensive LLMs.1 N-gram models are fundamentally
hindered by the exponential challenge of data sparsity and the inability to capture context beyond a fixed, narrow window.1
Crucially, the CLM's implementation of subword tokenization (specifically Byte Pair Encoding, BPE) structurally solves the
Out-of-Vocabulary (OOV) problem, preserving semantic information that N-gram models invariably destroy by collapsing
unseen words into a generic $\langle \text{unk} \rangle$ token.1
Conclusion
The architectural stability, efficiency, and deep contextual fidelity afforded by optimized Compact Language Models
position them as the definitive, operationally feasible choice for high-accuracy, specialized NLP tasks at the network edge.1
While N-gram models may serve as simple baselines for modeling localized statistical distributions, their severe architectural
limitations make them unsuitable for modern applications requiring complex semantic understanding.1
Keywords :
Compact Language Models (CLMs); Subword Encoding; Byte Pair Encoding (BPE); Edge Computing; Perplexity; Transformer.