⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



Board Governance Practices and Organizational Performance of Kenyan State Corporations: A Case Study of the Nuclear Power and Energy Agency


Authors : Adewa Damian Okelo; Jared Osoro

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 9 - September


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/4ur3fcpz

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26sep905

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : This study examined the effect of board governance practices on organizational performance at the Nuclear Power and Energy Agency (NuPEA), with specific focus on board independence and board oversight practices. The study was motivated by persistent governance and performance challenges among Kenyan state corporations, including weaknesses in accountability, oversight, strategic decision-making, and resource utilization. Guided by Agency Theory, the study adopted a causal research design. The target population comprised 200 employees of NuPEA, from whom 133 respondents were selected using stratified random sampling. Primary data were collected using structured questionnaires, while 105 completed questionnaires were returned and analysed using SPSS version 28.

Keywords : Board Independence, Board Oversight, Organizational Performance, State Corporations, Governance, NuPEA.

References :

  1. Abdullahi, S., & Alifiah, M. N. (2021). Board independence and capital structure of Nigerian non-financial listed firms: The moderating role of institutional ownership. International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research, 5(2).
  2. Alam, M. (2021). A systematic qualitative case study: Questions, data collection, NVivo analysis and saturation. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 16(1), 1–31.
  3. Beasley, M. S., Goldman, N. C., Lewellen, C. M., & McAllister, M. (2021). Board risk oversight and corporate tax planning practices. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 33(1), 7–32.
  4. Bhatia, M., & Gulati, R. (2021). Board governance practices and bank performance: A meta-analysis. Research in International Business and Finance, 58, 101425.
  5. Bordens, K., & Abbott, B. B. (2021). Research design and methods: A process approach (10th ed.). McGraw Hill Education.
  6. Chalu, H. (2021). Board characteristics, auditing characteristics and audit report lag in African central banks. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 11(4), 578–609.
  7. Cole, R. (2023). Inter rater reliability methods in qualitative case study research. Sociological Methods & Research, 53(4), 1944–1975.
  8. Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Cannella, A. A. (2003). Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 371–382.
  9. Dawson, C. (2019). Introduction to research methods: A practical guide for anyone undertaking a research project (5th ed.). Robinson.
  10. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325.
  11. Ganesha, H. R., & Aithal, P. S. (2022). Choosing appropriate research data collection methods in doctoral studies. International Journal of Management, Technology, and Social Sciences, 7(2), 455–489.
  12. Habersang, S., & Reihlen, M. (2024). Advancing qualitative meta studies: Current practices and reflective guidelines for synthesizing qualitative research. Organizational Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281241240180
  13. Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404–1427.
  14. Hossain, M., & Islam, M. (2025). CEO board chair familial relation, firm performance and moderating role of board independence: Evidence from an emerging economy. Corporate Governance, 37(1), 1–37.
  15. Ifada, L. M., Hendar, H., & Mohd Saleh, N. (2024). Board governance practices model, institutions, and financial performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(5), 3869–3883.
  16. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
  17. Kemei, R. J., & Machoka, P. (2025). Accountability and fairness of corporate governance on the performance of state corporations in Kenya. EPRA International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(2), 45–58.
  18. Khan, M. T., Al Jabri, Q. M., & Saif, N. (2021). Dynamic relationship between corporate board structure and firm performance: Evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(1), 644–661.
  19. Khoa, B. T., Hung, B. P., & Hejsalem Brahmi, M. (2023). Qualitative research in social sciences: Data collection, analysis and reporting. International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management, 12(1–2), 187–209.
  20. Klarner, P., Tuschke, A., & Hitt, M. A. (2021). A capability-based view of boards: A new conceptual framework for board governance practices. Academy of Management Perspectives, 35(1), 123–141.
  21. Kula, V. (2006). Corporate governance reforms: Agency and stewardship theories. Corporate Governance, 6(1), 1–14.
  22. Mkandawire, S. B. (2019). Selected common methods and tools for data collection in research. Selected Readings in Education, 2, 143–153.
  23. Mulama, M. W. (2023). Influence of board of management governance practices on safety standards in public secondary schools in Rabai Sub County, Kilifi County, Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi).
  24. Mweshi, G. K., & Sakyi, K. (2020). Application of sampling methods for research design. Archives of Business Review, 8(11), 180–193.
  25. Ndilito, N. N., & Massito, J. (2023). Influence of governance components on economic growth in Tanzania. African Journal of Empirical Research, 4(1), 80–89.
  26. Nuclear Power and Energy Agency. (2023). Strategic plan 2023–2027. Author.
  27. Ocak, M., Arioglu, E., & Kurtulmuş, B. (2026). Does mutual tenure between female independent members and top managers affect financial reporting quality? Gender in Management: An International Journal, 1–25.
  28. O’Neill, B. (2022). Sample size determination with a pilot study. PLOS ONE, 17(2).
  29. Pearson, N., Naylor, P. J., Ashe, M. C., Fernandez, M., Yoong, S. L., & Wolfenden, L. (2020). Guidance for conducting feasibility and pilot studies for implementation trials. Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 6(1), 167–181.
  30. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row.
  31. Priya, A. (2020). Case study methodology of qualitative research. Sociological Bulletin, 70(1), 94–110.
  32. Republic of Kenya. (2023). State corporations’ annual performance evaluation report for the FY 2021–2022. National Treasury and Economic Planning.
  33. Salmona, M., & Kaczynski, D. (2024). Qualitative data analysis strategies. In How to conduct qualitative research in finance. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  34. Siddique, A., Ali, A., & Audi, M. (2025). Corporate governance and firm profitability: Leadership structure and board diversity in the Dubai Stock Exchange. Contemporary Journal of Social Science Review, 3(2), 1166–1176.
  35. Taherdoost, H. (2021). Data collection methods and tools for research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 10(1), 10–38.
  36. World Bank. (2021). Enhancing corporate governance of state-owned enterprises in developing economies. World Bank.
  37. Xu, A., Baysari, M., & Stocker, S. (2020). Researchers’ views on informed consent in human participant research. BMC Medical Ethics, 21, 93.
  38. Życzyńska Ciołek, D., & Kołczyńska, M. (2021). Does interviewers’ age affect assessment of respondents’ understanding? Journal of Public Opinion Research, 33(2), 460–476.

This study examined the effect of board governance practices on organizational performance at the Nuclear Power and Energy Agency (NuPEA), with specific focus on board independence and board oversight practices. The study was motivated by persistent governance and performance challenges among Kenyan state corporations, including weaknesses in accountability, oversight, strategic decision-making, and resource utilization. Guided by Agency Theory, the study adopted a causal research design. The target population comprised 200 employees of NuPEA, from whom 133 respondents were selected using stratified random sampling. Primary data were collected using structured questionnaires, while 105 completed questionnaires were returned and analysed using SPSS version 28.

Keywords : Board Independence, Board Oversight, Organizational Performance, State Corporations, Governance, NuPEA.

Paper Submission Last Date
31 - October - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe