Authors :
Dr. Sharath Kumar Shetty; Dr. Shravya N.; Dr. Mahesh Kumar Y.
Volume/Issue :
Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 4 - April
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/yxfsebmd
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/4xrukpsy
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24APR1175
Abstract :
Aim :
The study aimed to assess the impact of ethyl
alcohol wet bonding on the shear bond strength (SBS) of
orthodontic brackets compared to conventional wet
bonding methods.
Materials and Methods :
12 premolar teeth were utilized and divided into
two groups: conventional wet bonding and ethanol wet
bonding. Each group followed its respective bonding
protocol.After bonding, the teeth were immersed in
water for complete polymerization.Shear bond strength
was assessed using a Universal Testing Machine
(UTM).Statistical analysis was performed to compare
the shear bond strength between the two groups.
Results :
The mean shear bond strength observed in the ethyl
alcohol wet bonding group was higher compared to the
conventional wet bonding group.Statistical analysis
revealed a significant difference between the shear bond
strengths of the two groups, with ethyl alcohol wet
bonding demonstrating superior results.
Conclusion :
The mean shear bond strength achieved with ethyl
alcohol wet bonding (6.5 MPa) falls within the optimal
range as indicated by Reynolds et al. (1976).Ethanol
could serve as a cost-effective alternative to MIP
(presumably a bonding agent or adhesive used in
conventional wet bonding).
This study suggests that ethyl alcohol wet bonding
may offer advantages in terms of shear bond strength
compared to conventional wet bonding methods,
potentially providing a viable alternative for orthodontic
bracket bonding
Keywords :
Ethyl Alcohol, Shear Bond Strength, Orthodontic Brackets.
Aim :
The study aimed to assess the impact of ethyl
alcohol wet bonding on the shear bond strength (SBS) of
orthodontic brackets compared to conventional wet
bonding methods.
Materials and Methods :
12 premolar teeth were utilized and divided into
two groups: conventional wet bonding and ethanol wet
bonding. Each group followed its respective bonding
protocol.After bonding, the teeth were immersed in
water for complete polymerization.Shear bond strength
was assessed using a Universal Testing Machine
(UTM).Statistical analysis was performed to compare
the shear bond strength between the two groups.
Results :
The mean shear bond strength observed in the ethyl
alcohol wet bonding group was higher compared to the
conventional wet bonding group.Statistical analysis
revealed a significant difference between the shear bond
strengths of the two groups, with ethyl alcohol wet
bonding demonstrating superior results.
Conclusion :
The mean shear bond strength achieved with ethyl
alcohol wet bonding (6.5 MPa) falls within the optimal
range as indicated by Reynolds et al. (1976).Ethanol
could serve as a cost-effective alternative to MIP
(presumably a bonding agent or adhesive used in
conventional wet bonding).
This study suggests that ethyl alcohol wet bonding
may offer advantages in terms of shear bond strength
compared to conventional wet bonding methods,
potentially providing a viable alternative for orthodontic
bracket bonding
Keywords :
Ethyl Alcohol, Shear Bond Strength, Orthodontic Brackets.