Authors : Achmad Budi Agung Romond; Anwar Dolu; Fatmawati Amir

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 6 - June

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/2kye75ej

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/nmw3hbeu

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jun1133

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : The infrastructure damage caused by the 7,5Mw earthquake in Palu on September 28, 2018, underscores the critical importance of evaluating the seismic resilience of public facility buildings, including the Tadulako University Hospital. To assess the feasibility and seismic vulnerability level of the structure, an evaluation was conducted based on prevailing standards, specifically ASCE/SEI 41-17. This study discusses the evaluation of the existing hospital building, focusing on the performance of its structural components under seismic loading. Referring to ASCE/SEI 41-17, two levels of seismic hazard were utilized: BSE-1E (225-year return period) and BSE-2E (975-year return period), with their respective target performance levels set as Immediate Occupancy (IO) and Life Safety (LS). The evaluation procedure employed the Linear Dynamic Procedure (LDP) via modal response spectrum (MRS) analysis. The research findings identified failures in several column and beam elements to satisfy the acceptance criteria, indicating potential deficiencies in structural performance. Consequently, the existing building is declared non-compliant with both the IO (BSE-1E) and LS (BSE-2E) target performance levels.

Keywords : Hospital Building; Seismic Hazard; Performance Levels; Linear Dynamic Procedure.

References :

1. Mason, H. B., et al. (2019). Geotechnical Extreme Events Reconnaissance: The 28 September 2018 M7.5 Palu-Donggala, Indonesia Earthquake (Version 1.0, 3 April 2019). GEER Association Report No. GEER-061.
2. Montgomery, Jack., et al. (2021). Field Reconnaissance Data from GEER Investigation of the 2018 Mw 7.5 Palu-Donggala Earthquake. Data in Brief, 34, 106742. 10.1016/j.dib.2021.106742.
3. Nugroho, Wivia., Sagara, Altho., & Imran, Iswandi. (2022). The evolution of Indonesian seismic and concrete building codes: From the past to the present. Structures, 41, 1092-1108. 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.05.032.
4. Shao, Benshun., Mahin, Stephen A., & Zayas, Victor. (2017). Member capacity factors for seismic isolators to limit collapse risks of seismically isolated structure to ASCE 7 stipulated limits.
5. Imran, Iswandi., Siringoringo, Dionysius., & Rainayana, Salma. (2024). Seismic evaluation and retrofit of a typical reinforced concrete hospital building in Indonesia with DCFP isolation system. Structures, 64, 106593. 10.1016/j.istruc.2024.106593.
6. American Society of Civil Engineers. (2017). Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings (ASCE/SEI 41-17). Reston, VA: ASCE.
7. Badan Standarisasi Nasional. (2019). Tata cara perencanaan ketahanan gempa untuk struktur bangunan gedung dan nongedung (SNI 1726:2019). Jakarta: BSN.
8. Badan Standarisasi Nasional. (2020). Beban desain minimum dan kriteria terkait untuk bangunan gedung dan struktur lain (SNI 1727:2020). Jakarta: BSN.
9. Badan Standarisasi Nasional. (2017). Baja tulangan beton (SNI 2052:2017). Jakarta: BSN.
10. European Committee for Standardization. (2005). Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance - Part 2: Bridges (EN 1998-2). Brussels: CEN Management Centre 36, Rue de Stassart B-1050.
11. Jan, Song. (2018). Performance-based seismic assessment of a large concrete framed structure supporting multi-units of heavy compressors. Journal of Vibroengineering, 20. 10.21595/jve.2017.19325.
12. Speicher, Matthew S., & Harris, John L. (2015). Assessment of first generation performance-based seismic design methods for new steel buildings, volume 2: Special concentrically braced frames. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST Technical Note 1863-2. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.TN.1863-2.
13. Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat, Direktorat Jenderal Cipta Karya, Desain Spektra Indonesia 2021, 12-28 Maret 2021, http://rsa.ciptakarya.pu.go.id.
14. Partono, Windu., Irsyam, Masyhur., Nazir, Ramli., Asrurifak, M., Kistiani, Frida., & Sari, Undayani. (2021). Development of Peak Ground Acceleration Map of Semarang Based on Indonesian Seismic Code 2019. Media Komunikasi Teknik Sipil, 27, 203-212. 10.14710/mkts.v27i2.40714.
15. Fiqhunissa, Ananda Elnish., Satyarno, Iman., Setiawan, Angga Fajar., Ab Kadir, Mariyana Aida., & Darmawan, Muhamad Fauzi. (2024). Seismic performance evaluation of irregular auditorium building based on ASCE 41-23. Journal of the Civil Engineering Forum 2024, 299-314. 10.22146/jcef.13306.
16. Sulthan, Faiz., Sabaruliman, Angga Arief Gumilang., Rusli, Muhammad., & Seki, Matsutaro. (2023). Seismic evaluation of existing building structure using United States (ASCE 41-17) and Japanese (JBDPA) standard: Case study office building in Indonesia. E3S Web of Conferences, 429. 10.1051/e3sconf/202342905001.