Authors :
Sultana Begam; Mariyam Khan; Suchitra Sapakal; Shakeel Ansari
Volume/Issue :
Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 11 - November
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/yvkjmrxr
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/ynz2jjm6
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25nov1350
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
Subsurface fluid flow and solute transport through porous geological formations form the foundation of
hydrogeology, environmental engineering, and energy resource management. This manuscript presents a mathematical
exposition of the governing equations, analytical formulations, and computational models describing fluid and contaminant
migration in groundwater systems. In addition to characterizing natural flow behavior, special emphasis is placed on the
mechanisms responsible for groundwater contamination, including the movement of pollutants from industrial discharge,
agricultural leachates, and subsurface waste repositories. We explore the interplay between pore-scale heterogeneity,
continuum-scale flow laws, and transport mechanisms such as advection, dispersion, diffusion, and reactive interactions that
govern contaminant fate. Furthermore, the discussion extends to the mathematical modeling of remediation strategies—
such as pump-and-treat, in-situ bioremediation, and permeable reactive barriers—and their effectiveness under varying
hydrogeological conditions. The synthesis connects classical Darcy theory with modern multi-scale, stochastic, and data-
driven frameworks, offering insights into contamination prediction, risk assessment, remediation optimization, and
sustainable groundwater utilization.
Keywords :
Porous Media, Subsurface Flow, Darcy’s Law, Advection-Dispersion, Solute Migration
References :
- Famiglietti, J. S. (2014). The global groundwater crisis. Nature Climate Change, 4(11), 945-948.
- Fogg, G. E., & LaBolle, E. M. (2006). Motivation of synthesis, with an example on groundwater quality sustainability. Water Resources Research, 42(3).
- Darcy, H. (1856). Les Fontaines Publiques de la Ville de Dijon. Dalmont.
- Bear, J. (1972). Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media. Elsevier.
- Freeze, R. A., & Cherry, J. A. (1979). Groundwater. Prentice-Hall.
- Gelhar, L. W. (1986). Stochastic subsurface hydrology from theory to applications. Water Resources Research, 22(9S), 135S-145S.
- Berkowitz, B., Cortis, A., Dagan, G., & Scher, H. (2006). Modeling non-Fickian transport in geological formations as a continuous time random walk. Reviews of Geophysics, 44(2).
- Dagan, G. (1989). Flow and Transport in Porous Formations. Springer-Verlag.
- Rubin, Y. (2003). Applied Stochastic Hydrogeology. Oxford University Press.
- Tartakovsky, A. M., Marrero, C. O., Perdikaris, P., Tartakovsky, G. D., & Barajas-Solano, D. (2020). Physics-Informed Deep Neural Networks for Learning Parameters and Constitutive Relationships in Subsurface Flow Problems. Water Resources Research, 56(5).
- Laloy, E., Hérault, R., Jacques, D., & Linde, N. (2021). Training-image based geostatistical inversion using a deep generative adversarial network. Water Resources Research, 57(2).
- Hermans, T., & Paasche, H. (2021). 4D hydrogeophysical data assimilation using state-space models and ensemble Kalman filtering. Surveys in Geophysics, 42(5), 1081-1104.
- Shi, M., Zhang, F., & Lin, Y. (2020). Multi-scale modeling of groundwater vulnerability. Advances in Water Resources, 145, 103734.
- Guan, X., Zhang, Y., & Li, M. (2023). Bayesian source identification of groundwater contamination using a reactive transport model. Journal of Hydrology, 617, 128989.
- Lichtner, P. C. (1996). Continuum formulation of multicomponent-multiphase reactive transport. Reviews in Mineralogy, 34, 1-81.
- Prommer, H., Barry, D. A., & Zheng, C. (2003). MODFLOW/MT3DMS-based reactive multicomponent transport modeling. Ground Water, 41(2), 247-257.
- Brusseau, M. L. (2019). The influence of molecular structure on the adsorption of PFAS to soil and non-aqueous phase liquids. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, 21(11), 1831-1839.
- Li, D., Johnson, R. L., & Trigatti, M. (2022). Integrating functional gene biomarkers into reactive transport models for predicting in situ bioremediation efficacy. Environmental Science & Technology, 56(12), 7893-7903.
- Ogata, A., & Banks, R. B. (1961). A Solution of the Differential Equation of Longitudinal Dispersion in Porous Media. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 411-A. U.S. Government Printing Office.
Subsurface fluid flow and solute transport through porous geological formations form the foundation of
hydrogeology, environmental engineering, and energy resource management. This manuscript presents a mathematical
exposition of the governing equations, analytical formulations, and computational models describing fluid and contaminant
migration in groundwater systems. In addition to characterizing natural flow behavior, special emphasis is placed on the
mechanisms responsible for groundwater contamination, including the movement of pollutants from industrial discharge,
agricultural leachates, and subsurface waste repositories. We explore the interplay between pore-scale heterogeneity,
continuum-scale flow laws, and transport mechanisms such as advection, dispersion, diffusion, and reactive interactions that
govern contaminant fate. Furthermore, the discussion extends to the mathematical modeling of remediation strategies—
such as pump-and-treat, in-situ bioremediation, and permeable reactive barriers—and their effectiveness under varying
hydrogeological conditions. The synthesis connects classical Darcy theory with modern multi-scale, stochastic, and data-
driven frameworks, offering insights into contamination prediction, risk assessment, remediation optimization, and
sustainable groundwater utilization.
Keywords :
Porous Media, Subsurface Flow, Darcy’s Law, Advection-Dispersion, Solute Migration