Shorten Time to Market for ISO 26262 ASIL D Certification: The Lion of Functional Safety’s Novel Approach


Authors : Jherrod Thomas

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 3 - March


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/mtah2yra

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25mar1762

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : This research deciphersthe formulation and deployment of an innovative methodological framework by ‘The Lion of Functional Safety’ to accelerate ISO 26262 ASIL D certification within the dynamic automotive industry. As vehicles become more infused with complex electronic and software systems, the imperative of maintaining functional safety is heightened. This study adopts a holistic mixed-methods approach, melding quantitative data with qualitative evaluations, to ascertain the efficacy of incorporating cutting-edge digital tools, model-based testing methodologies, and automated verification mechanisms. The framework introduced significantly shortens the time-to market for critical safety components in automotive applications, evidencing a 40% reduction in the duration of compliance processes while maintaining safety integrity. The principal findings reveal substantial improvements in fault identification, enhanced system verification via automated techniques, and the employment of machine learning algorithmsfor preventive safety evaluations. Such technological advancements simplify the certification trajectory and strengthen the reliability of vehicle safety systems against possible failures. The research suggests that adopting such comprehensive and technologically sophisticated approaches significantly enhances the efficiency of meeting the rigorous demands of ISO 26262 ASIL D standards. Furthermore, it provides a substantial advantage to automotive manufacturers by refining the product development lifecycle and optimizing cost-effectiveness. These insights are critical for manufacturers striving to adhere to evolving safety regulations while expediting product introductions in a fiercely competitive market. Index Terms—ISO 26262, ASIL D, automotive safety, functional safety, model-based testing, automated verification, digital tools, machine learning, predictive safety.

References :

  1. S.-H. Jeon, J.-H. Cho, Y. Jung, S. Park, and T.-M. Han, “Automotive hardware development according to ISO 26262,” in 13th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT2011), Feb. 2011, pp. 588–592, iSSN: 1738-9445. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5745882
  2. I. Pathak and B. Kothari, “ISO 26262 Functional Safety – An Approach for Compliance Readiness,” SAE International, Warrendale, PA, SAE Technical Paper 2024-26-0104, Jan. 2024, iSSN: 0148-7191, 2688-3627. [Online]. Available: https://www.sae.org/publications/technical- papers/content/2024-26-0104/
  3. R. Schweiger, D. Langen, and J. Müller, “Holistic FMEDA-driven safety design and verification for analog, digital, and mixed-signal design,” 2021.
  4. P. Iyenghar, E. Gracic, and G. Pawelke, “A Systematic Approach to Enhancing ISO 26262 With Machine Learning-Specific Life Cycle Phases and Testing Methods,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 179 600– 179 627, 2024, conference Name: IEEE Access. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10767223
  5. C. Lidström, C. Bondesson, M. Nyberg, and J. Westman, “Improved Pattern for ISO 26262 ASIL Decomposition with Dependent Requirements,” in 2019 IEEE 19th International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security Companion (QRS-C), Jul. 2019, pp. 28–35. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8859482
  6. D. D. Ward and I. Ibarra, “Development Phase in Accordance with ISO 26262,” in 8th IET International System Safety Conference incorporating the Cyber Security Conference 2013, Oct. 2013, place: Cardiff, UK. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1049/cp.2013.1718
  7. L. Bressan, A. L. de Oliveira, F. Campos, Y. Papadopoulos, and Parker, “An Integrated Approach to Support the Process-Based Certification of Variant-Intensive Systems,” in Model-Based Safety and Assessment, M. Zeller and K. Höfig, Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 179–193.
  8. B. Gallina, “A Model-Driven Safety Certification Method for Process Compliance,” in 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops, Nov. 2014, pp. 204–209. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6983839
  9. G. Bahig and A. El-Kadi, “Formal Verification of Automotive Design in Compliance With ISO 26262 Design Verification Guidelines,” IEEE Access, vol. 5, pp. 4505–4516, 2017, conference Name: IEEE Access. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/ document/7879875
  10. F. A. da Silva, A. Cagri Bagbaba, S. Hamdioui, and C. Sauer, “An automated formal-based approach for reducing undetected faults in ISO 26262 hardware compliant designs,” in 2021 IEEE International Test Conference (ITC), Oct. 2021, pp. 329–333, iSSN: 2378-2250. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9611308
  11. S. Z. A. Naqvi, “Checking Compliance with ISO 26262 using Conceptual Modeling as a Tool,” Thesis, 2018, accepted: 2018- 06-08T16:25:14Z. [Online]. Available: https://macsphere.mcmaster.ca/ handle/11375/23057
  12. H. J. Holberg and S. Häusler, “From safety requirements to safety mon- itors—automatic synthesis in compliance with ISO 26262,” Embedded World: Nuremberg, Germany, 2012.
  13. Y. Gheraibia, K. Djafri, and H. Krimou, “Ant colony algorithm for automotive safety integrity level allocation,” Applied Intelligence, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 555–569, Mar. 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-017-1000-6
  14. J. Braun and J. Mottok, “Fail-safe and fail-operational systems safeguarded with coded processing,” in Eurocon 2013, Jul. 2013, pp. 1878–1885. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore .ieee.org/abstract/ document/6625234
  15. A. Micron and W. Paper, “DRAM in Safety Critical Automotive Systems,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ DRAM-in-Safety-Critical-Automotive-Systems-Micron-Paper/ 2bac0139eb36a28a93c01ff08c843336 ac96ab05?utm_source=consensus
  16. A. Young and A. Walker, “Qualifying Dependent Failure Analysis Within ISO26262: Applicability to Semiconductors,” in Systems, Soft- ware and Services Process Improvement, X. Larrucea, I. Santamaria, R. V. O’Connor, and R. Messnarz, Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 331–340.
  17. A. Frigerio, B. Vermeulen, and K. Goossens, “A Generic Method for a Bottom-Up ASIL Decomposition,” in Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security, B. Gallina, A. Skavhaug, and F. Bitsch, Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 12–26.
  18. K. Chitnis, M. Mody, P. Swami, R. Sivaraj, C. Ghone, M. G. Biju, B. Narayanan, Y. Dutt, A. Dubey, M. Mody, P. Swami, R. Sivaraj, C. Ghone, M. G. Biju, B. Narayanan, Y. Dutt, and A. Dubey, “Enabling Functional Safety ASIL Compliance for Autonomous Driving Software Systems,” Electronic Imaging, vol. 29, pp. 35–40, Jan. 2017, publisher: Society for Imaging Science and Technology. [Online]. Available: https://library.imaging.org/ei/articles/29/19/art00007
  19. J. Grosse, M. Hampton, S. Marchese, J. Koch, N. Rattray, and A. Zagardan, “ISO 26262 Fault Analysis in Safety Mechanisms Considering the impact of residual and latent         faults in hardware               safety mechanisms,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ISO-26262-Fault-Analysis-in-Safety-Mechanisms-the-Grosse-Hampton/80f86b545a9fe833f972a7b4a1aaca600070e8c7?utm_source=consensus
  20. T. A. Beyene and H. Ruess, “Evidential and Continuous Integration of Software Verification Tools,” in Formal Methods, K. Havelund, J. Pe- leska, B. Roscoe, and E. de Vink, Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 679–685.
  21. B. Klamann and H. Winner, “Comparing Different Levels of Technical Systems for a Modular Safety Approval—Why the State of the Art Does Not Dispense with System Tests Yet,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 22, p. 7516, Jan. 2021, number: 22 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/22/7516
  22. B. Kaiser, M. Soden, R. Diefenbach, and E. Holz, “An agile approach to safety cases for autonomous systems through model-based engineering and simulation,” 2025.
  23. S. Khastgir, G. Dhadyalla, and P. Jennings, “Incorporating ISO 26262 Concepts in an Automated Testing Toolchain Using Simulink Design Verifier™,” SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars - Electronic and Electrical Systems, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 59–65, Apr. 2016, publisher: SAE International. [Online]. Available: https://saemobilus.sae.org/ articles/incorporating-iso-26262-concepts-automated-testing-toolchain- using-simulink-design-verifier-2016-01-0032
  24. L. Pintard, M. Leeman, A. Ymlahi-Ouazzani, J.-C. Fabre, K. Kanoun, and M. Roy, “Using Fault Injection to Verify an AUTOSAR Application According to the ISO 26262,” in SAE 2015 World Congress & Exhibition, ser. Journal Articles from SAE 2015 World Congress & Exhibition. Detroit, United States: SAE International, Apr. 2015. [Online]. Available: https://hal.science/hal-01221422
  25. M. Broy, “A logical approach to systems engineering artifacts: semantic relationships and dependencies beyond traceability—from requirements to functional and architectural views,” Software & Systems Modeling, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 365–393, May 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-017-0619-4
  26. B. Gallina and M. Nyberg, “Pioneering the Creation of ISO 26262- Compliant OSLC-Based Safety Cases,” in 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW), Oct. 2017, pp. 325–330. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/ abstract/document/8109302
  27. M. Staron, R. Rana, and J. Hansson, “Influence of Software Complexity on ISO/IEC 26262 Software Verification Requirements,” 2015.
  28. B. Gallina and M. Nyberg, “Reconciling the ISO 26262-compliant and the agile documentation management in the Swedish context,” in CARS 2015 - Critical Automotive applications: Robustness & Safety, M. Roy, Ed., Paris, France, Sep. 2015. [Online]. Available: https://hal.science/hal-01192981
  29. D. Johansson and P. Karlsson, “Safety mechanisms for random ECU hardware failures in compliance with ISO 26262,” Ph.D. dissertation, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12380/218280
  30. S. Khastgir, H. Sivencrona, G. Dhadyalla, P. Billing, S. Birrell, and P. Jennings, “Introducing ASIL inspired dynamic tactical safety decision framework for automated vehicles,” in 2017 IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Oct. 2017, pp. 1–6, iSSN: 2153-0017. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8317868
  31. T. H. P. D. M. L. C. W. Georg, J.-M., “Development of a human driver model during highly automated driving for the ASIL controllability clas- sification,” in 8. Tagung Fahrerassistenz. Lehrstuhl für Fahrzeugtechnik mit TÜV SÜD Akademie, 2017.
  32. M. Suerken and T. Peikenkamp, “Model-based Application of ISO 26262: The Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment,” SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars - Electronic and Electrical Systems, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 114–125, Apr. 2013, number: 2013-01-0184. [Online]. Available: https://www.sae.org/publications/technical-papers/ content/2013-01-0184/
  33. V. Rupanov, C. Buckl, L. Fiege, M. Armbruster, A. Knoll, and G. Spiegelberg, “Early safety evaluation of design decisions in E/E architecture according to ISO 26262,” in Proceedings of the 3rd international ACM SIGSOFT symposium on Architecting Critical Systems, ser. ISARCS ’12. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, Jun. 2012, pp. 1–10. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/2304656.2304658
  34. K.-L. Leu, H. Huang, Y.-Y. Chen, L.-R. Huang, and K.-M. Ji, “An intelligent brake-by-wire system design and analysis in accordance with ISO-26262 functional safety standard,” in 2015 International Conference on Connected Vehicles and Expo (ICCVE), Oct. 2015, pp. 150–156, iSSN: 2378-1297. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7447585
  35. K.-L. Lu and Y.-Y. Chen, “ISO 26262 ASIL-Oriented Hardware Design Framework for Safety-Critical Automotive Systems,” in 2019 IEEE International Conference on Connected Vehicles and Expo (ICCVE), Nov. 2019, pp. 1–6, iSSN: 2378-1297. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8965235
  36. A. Adhikari, A. Saban, S. Bohora, and V. Shastri, “Functional Safety for Automatic Emergency Braking based on ISO 26262: Paper No.: 2023-GI-04,” ARAI Journal of Mobility Technology, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 666–685, Aug. 2023, number: 3. [Online]. Available: http://araijournal.com/index.php/arai/article/view/246
  37. S. Kuhn and E. E. A. GmbH, “Combined application of agile practices and functional safety in automotive software development How Scrum and other agile practices can support ISO 26262 compliance,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ Combined-application-of-agile-practices-and-safety-Kuhn-GmbH/b907416fe3bf0a3ea44e9cebfdb6dc503b7e6c56?utm_source=consensus
  38. T. Myklebust and T. Stålhane, The Agile Safety Case, 1st ed. Springer Cham, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70265-0
  39. , , , , and S. Wendling, “ISO26262 MBSE Process ,” , pp. 345–350, May 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.dbpia.co.kr/Journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE07123880
  40. C. Singam and J. Carter, “Model-based systems engineering (MBSE),” The Guide to the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBoK), vol. 2, 2022, publisher: The Trustees of the Stevens Institute of Tech- nology.
  41. G. Macher, H. Sporer, E. Armengaud, E. Brenner, and C. Kreiner, “Using Model-based Development for ISO26262 aligned HSI Definition,” in CARS 2015 - Critical Automotive applications: Robustness & Safety, Paris, France, Sep. 2015. [Online]. Available: https://hal.science/hal-01193034
  42. M. I. Hafiz, “Model Based Development Methodology in Compliance with ISO 26262 for Safe Automotive ECU,” in 2023 International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Energy Technologies (ICECET), Nov. 2023, pp. 1–6. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10389360
  43. D. Vereno, K. Polanec, and C. Neureiter, “Compliance by Design for Cyber-Physical Energy Systems: The Role of Model- Based Systems Engineering in Complying with the EU AI Act:,” in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Model-Based Software and Systems Engineering. Rome, Italy: SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, 2024, pp. 365–370. [Online]. Available: https://www.scitepress.org/DigitalLibrary/ Link.aspx?doi=10.5220/0012623000003645
  44. H. M. Maqsood, E. M. Guerra, X. Wang, and A. Bondavalli, “Patterns for Development of Safety-Critical Systems with Agile: Trace Safety Requirements and Perform Automated Testing,” in Proceedings of the European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs 2020, ser. EuroPLoP ’20. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, Dec. 2020, pp. 1–6. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3424771.3424800
  45. D. Amalfitano, M. De Luca, and A. Rita Fasolino, “Documenting Software Architecture Design in Compliance with the ISO 26262: a Practical Experience in Industry,” in 2023 IEEE 20th International Conference on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C), Mar. 2023, pp. i–xi, iSSN: 2768-4288. [Online]. Available: https:// ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10092726
  46. B. Dion, “A Cost-Effective Model-Based Approach for Developing ISO 26262 Compliant Automotive Safety Related Applications,” SAE International, Warrendale, PA, SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-0138, Apr. 2016, iSSN: 0148-7191, 2688-3627. [Online]. Available: https://www.sae.org/publications/technical-papers/content/2016-01-0138/
  47. T. Chowdhury, C.-W. Lin, B. Kim, M. Lawford, S. Shiraishi, and Wassyng, “Principles for Systematic Development of an Assurance Case Template from ISO 26262,” in 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW), Oct. 2017, pp. 69–72. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/ abstract/document/8109254
  48. L. Erdal, A. Gubartalla, P. V. Lopes, H. Cao, G. Shao, P. Lonnehed, H. Putto, A. Ahmed, S. Ekered, and B. Johansson, “Integrating Dynamic Digital Twins: Enabling Real-Time Connectivity for IoT and Virtual Reality,” in 2024 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), Dec. 2024, pp. 2987–2998, iSSN: 1558-4305. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10838921
  49. G. Lugaresi, S. Gangemi, G. Gazzoni, and A. Matta, “Online Validation of Simulation-Based Digital Twins Exploiting Time Series Analysis,” in 2022 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), Dec. 2022, pp. 2912–2923, iSSN: 1558-4305. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/ document/10015346
  50. G. Caiza and R. Sanz, “Immersive Digital Twin under ISO 23247 Applied to Flexible Manufacturing Processes,” Applied Sciences, vol. 14, no. 10, p. 4204, Jan. 2024, number: 10 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/10/4204
  51. H. Pikner, M. Malayjerdi, M. Bellone, B. C. Baykara, and R. Sell, “Autonomous Driving Validation and Verification Using Digital Twins.” VEHITS, pp. 204–211, 2024.
  52. R. Almeida, V. Silva, and J. Cabral, “Virtualized Fault Injection Framework for ISO 26262-Compliant Digital Component Hardware Faults,” Electronics, vol. 13, no. 14, p. 2787, Jan. 2024, number: 14 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/13/14/2787
  53. B. Sari and H. Reuss, “Model-based Development of Safety-critical Functions and ISO 26262 Work Products using modified EAST-ADL,” Adv. Sci. Technol. Eng. Syst. J, vol. 2, pp. 1252–1259, 2017.
  54. G. R. Kothinti, “Advancing Functional Safety in Automated Driving: A Methodological Approach to Legacy System Integration under ISO 26262,” International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 964–970, Sep. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.ijraset.com/best-journal/advancing- functional-safety-in-automated-driving-a-methodological-approach-to- legacy-system-integration-under-iso-26262
  55. G. Xie, Y. Chen, Y. Liu, R. Li, and K. Li, “Minimizing Development Cost With Reliability Goal for Automotive Functional Safety During Design Phase,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 196–211, Mar. 2018, conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Reliability. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/ document/8207607
  56. Y. Zhou, S. Samii, P. Eles, and Z. Peng, “ASIL-Decomposition Based Routing and Scheduling in Safety-Critical Time-Sensitive Networking,” in 2021 IEEE 27th Real-Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium (RTAS), May 2021, pp. 184–195, iSSN: 2642- 7346. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/ 9470440
  57. K. Matsubara, H. Lieske, M. Kimura, A. Nakamura, M. Koike, S. Morikawa, Y. Hotta, T. Irita, S. Mochizuki, H. Hamasaki, and T. Kamei, “A 12-nm Autonomous Driving Processor With 60.4 TOPS, 13.8 TOPS/W CNN Executed by Task-Separated ASIL D Control,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 115–126, Jan. 2022, conference Name: IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits. [Online]. Available: https:/ /ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9600004

This research deciphersthe formulation and deployment of an innovative methodological framework by ‘The Lion of Functional Safety’ to accelerate ISO 26262 ASIL D certification within the dynamic automotive industry. As vehicles become more infused with complex electronic and software systems, the imperative of maintaining functional safety is heightened. This study adopts a holistic mixed-methods approach, melding quantitative data with qualitative evaluations, to ascertain the efficacy of incorporating cutting-edge digital tools, model-based testing methodologies, and automated verification mechanisms. The framework introduced significantly shortens the time-to market for critical safety components in automotive applications, evidencing a 40% reduction in the duration of compliance processes while maintaining safety integrity. The principal findings reveal substantial improvements in fault identification, enhanced system verification via automated techniques, and the employment of machine learning algorithmsfor preventive safety evaluations. Such technological advancements simplify the certification trajectory and strengthen the reliability of vehicle safety systems against possible failures. The research suggests that adopting such comprehensive and technologically sophisticated approaches significantly enhances the efficiency of meeting the rigorous demands of ISO 26262 ASIL D standards. Furthermore, it provides a substantial advantage to automotive manufacturers by refining the product development lifecycle and optimizing cost-effectiveness. These insights are critical for manufacturers striving to adhere to evolving safety regulations while expediting product introductions in a fiercely competitive market. Index Terms—ISO 26262, ASIL D, automotive safety, functional safety, model-based testing, automated verification, digital tools, machine learning, predictive safety.

CALL FOR PAPERS


Paper Submission Last Date
30 - June - 2025

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe