Authors :
Dr. Sadashiv Daokar; Dr. Shubhankar Nandkhedkar; Dr. Kalpana Pawar; Dr. Aishwarya Ranjalkar; Dr. Komal Potfode; Dr. Rutuja Pawar; Dr Vaishali Nandkhedkar
Volume/Issue :
Volume 8 - 2023, Issue 7 - July
Google Scholar :
https://bit.ly/3TmGbDi
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/4pzrtkvs
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8216686
Abstract :
Background:
Vertical root fracture and crown root fracture are a
major clinical issues that may occur due to excessive
widening of canals, use of irrigants, and medicaments. It
is one of the most frequent cause for the extraction of
root-filled teeth. Therefore, in addition to complete
sealing of the cavity, an intraorifice barrier could be
placed to strengthen the remaining tooth structure.
Aim:
The aim of the study is to assess the impact of two
alternative intra-orifice barrier materials on the
resistance of fracture of endodontically treated teeth.
Materials and Methodology:
45 extracted single-rooted human mandibular
premolars, decoronated to equal dimension, prepared to
be obturated with gutta-percha. The placement of
different intraorifice barrier materials, was done by
removing coronal 3-mm of gutta percha, except for the
control group. Based on the intraorifice barrier material
used, the specimens were divided into three groups (n =
15).
Group I: Control
Group II: Resin modified GIC
Group III: Composite
Universal testing machine was used to record the
fracture resistance of the specimens.
Results:
Better resistance to fracture was seen with flowable
nanohybrid composite and control group presented the
least values.
Conclusion:
An intraorifice barrier can be used for
reinforcement of the teeth that have undergone
endodontic therapy, making it a successful therapeutic
approach.
Background:
Vertical root fracture and crown root fracture are a
major clinical issues that may occur due to excessive
widening of canals, use of irrigants, and medicaments. It
is one of the most frequent cause for the extraction of
root-filled teeth. Therefore, in addition to complete
sealing of the cavity, an intraorifice barrier could be
placed to strengthen the remaining tooth structure.
Aim:
The aim of the study is to assess the impact of two
alternative intra-orifice barrier materials on the
resistance of fracture of endodontically treated teeth.
Materials and Methodology:
45 extracted single-rooted human mandibular
premolars, decoronated to equal dimension, prepared to
be obturated with gutta-percha. The placement of
different intraorifice barrier materials, was done by
removing coronal 3-mm of gutta percha, except for the
control group. Based on the intraorifice barrier material
used, the specimens were divided into three groups (n =
15).
Group I: Control
Group II: Resin modified GIC
Group III: Composite
Universal testing machine was used to record the
fracture resistance of the specimens.
Results:
Better resistance to fracture was seen with flowable
nanohybrid composite and control group presented the
least values.
Conclusion:
An intraorifice barrier can be used for
reinforcement of the teeth that have undergone
endodontic therapy, making it a successful therapeutic
approach.